Literature DB >> 25948782

A Randomized Trial of Iron-Biofortified Pearl Millet in School Children in India.

Julia L Finkelstein1, Saurabh Mehta1, Shobha A Udipi2, Padmini S Ghugre2, Sarah V Luna1, Michael J Wenger3, Laura E Murray-Kolb4, Eric M Przybyszewski1, Jere D Haas5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency is the most widespread nutritional deficiency in the world.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this randomized efficacy trial was to determine the effects of iron-biofortified pearl millet (Fe-PM) on iron status compared with control pearl millet (Control-PM).
METHODS: A randomized trial of biofortified pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), bred to enhance iron content, was conducted in 246 children (12-16 y) for 6 mo in Maharashtra, India. Iron status [hemoglobin, serum ferritin (SF), soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), and total body iron (TBI)], inflammation (C-reactive protein and α-1 acid glycoprotein), and anthropometric indices were evaluated at enrollment and after 4 and 6 mo. Hodges-Lehmann-Sen 95% CIs were used to examine the effect of the Fe-PM on iron status compared with commercially available Control-PM. Linear and binomial regression models were used to evaluate the effects of Fe-PM on iron status and incidence of anemia and iron deficiency, compared with Control-PM.
RESULTS: At baseline, 41% of children were iron deficient (SF <15 μg/L) and 28% were anemic (hemoglobin <12.0 g/dL). Fe-PM significantly increased SF concentrations and TBI after 4 mo compared with Control-PM. Among children who were iron deficient at baseline, those who received Fe-PM were 1.64 times more likely to become iron replete by 6 mo than were those receiving Control-PM (RR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.07, 2.49, P = 0.02). The effects of Fe-PM on iron status were greater among children who were iron deficient at baseline than among children who were not iron deficient at baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: Fe-PM significantly improved iron status in children by 4 mo compared with Control-PM. This study demonstrated that feeding Fe-PM is an efficacious approach to improve iron status in school-age children and it should be further evaluated for effectiveness in a broader population context. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02152150.
© 2015 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  India; anemia; biofortification; children; international nutrition; iron

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25948782     DOI: 10.3945/jn.114.208009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  30 in total

1.  Increased Iron Status during a Feeding Trial of Iron-Biofortified Beans Increases Physical Work Efficiency in Rwandan Women.

Authors:  Sarah V Luna; Laura M Pompano; Mercy Lung'aho; Jean Bosco Gahutu; Jere D Haas
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Do Behavioral Interventions Increase the Intake of Biofortified Foods in School Lunch Meals? Evidence from a Field Experiment with Elementary School Children in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Julius J Okello; David R Just; Wellington Jogo; Norman Kwikiriza; Haile Tesfaye
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2022-02-12

3.  Modeling relationships between iron status, behavior, and brain electrophysiology: evidence from a randomized study involving a biofortified grain in Indian adolescents.

Authors:  Michael J Wenger; Laura E Murray Kolb; Samuel P Scott; Erick Boy; Jere D Haas
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.135

4.  Can Improved Legume Varieties Optimize Iron Status in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Linet N Mutwiri; Florence Kyallo; Beatrice Kiage; Bart Van der Schueren; Christophe Matthys
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 5.  Dietary strategies for improving iron status: balancing safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Andrew M Prentice; Yery A Mendoza; Dora Pereira; Carla Cerami; Rita Wegmuller; Anne Constable; Jörg Spieldenner
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.110

Review 6.  The Combined Application of the Caco-2 Cell Bioassay Coupled with In Vivo (Gallus gallus) Feeding Trial Represents an Effective Approach to Predicting Fe Bioavailability in Humans.

Authors:  Elad Tako; Haim Bar; Raymond P Glahn
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  Biofortification in Millets: A Sustainable Approach for Nutritional Security.

Authors:  A Vinoth; R Ravindhran
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 8.  Iron homeostasis in plants - a brief overview.

Authors:  James M Connorton; Janneke Balk; Jorge Rodríguez-Celma
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.526

9.  Iron Bioavailability Studies of the First Generation of Iron-Biofortified Beans Released in Rwanda.

Authors:  Raymond Glahn; Elad Tako; Jonathan Hart; Jere Haas; Mercy Lung'aho; Steve Beebe
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Finger on the Pulse: Pumping Iron into Chickpea.

Authors:  Grace Z H Tan; Sudipta S Das Bhowmik; Thi M L Hoang; Mohammad R Karbaschi; Alexander A T Johnson; Brett Williams; Sagadevan G Mundree
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.