| Literature DB >> 32005538 |
Asimenia Angelidou1, Maria-Giulia Conti2, Joann Diray-Arce3, Christine S Benn4, Frank Shann5, Mihai G Netea6, Mark Liu7, Lakshmi Prasad Potluri8, Guzman Sanchez-Schmitz9, Robert Husson10, Al Ozonoff11, Beate Kampmann12, Simon Daniël van Haren13, Ofer Levy14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), the live attenuated tuberculosis vaccine, is manufactured under different conditions across the globe generating formulations that may differ in clinical efficacy. Innate immune recognition of live BCG contributes to immunogenicity suggesting that differences in BCG viability may contribute to divergent activity of licensed formulations.Entities:
Keywords: BCG vaccine formulation; Chemokine; Colony forming units; Cord blood; Cytokine; Viability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32005538 PMCID: PMC7556328 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccine ISSN: 0264-410X Impact factor: 4.169
Licensed BCG vaccine formulations used for this study.
| BCG strain | Mother strain (year of derivation) | Manufacturer | Route of admin | M.Bovis conc, mg/mL (bacillary mass prior reconstitution, mg/ vial) | Predicted CFU/mL | CFU (adult dose) | CFU (neonatal dose) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCG Denmark[ | BCG Pasteur (1931) | Statens Serum Institute, Denmark | intradermal | 0.75 (2) | 2–8 × 106 | 2–8 × 105 (in 0.1 mL) | 1–4 × 105 (in 0.05 mL) |
| BCG Japan[ | Pasteur-1173 P2 strain (1925)->Tokyo-172 strain (1979) | Japan BCG Laboratory | intradermal | 0.5 (1) | 4.4–5.5 × 107 (info from WHO) | 4.4–5.5 × 106 (in 0.1 mL) | 2.2–2.8 × 106 (in 0.05 mL) |
| BCG India (Pune)[ | BCG-Russia seed strain (?) | Serum Institute of India | intradermal | −(0.5) | 2–8 × 106 | 2–8 × 105 (in 0.1 mL) | 1–4 × 105 (in 0.05 mL) |
| BCG Bulgaria[ | BCG Russia seed strain (1950 s) | Bulbio (BB-NCIPD), Bulgaria | intradermal | 0.5 (−) | 1.5–6 × 106 | 1.5–6 × 105 (in 0.1 mL) | 0.75–3 × 105 (in 0.05 mL) |
| BCG USA (Tice) | BCG Pasteur (1934) | Merck, USA | percutaneous | −(50) | 1–8 × 108 (reconst, in 1 mL for adults) 0.5–4 × 108 (reconst, in 2 mL for neonates) | 2.5–16 × 107 (in 0.2 mL) | 1–2.5 × 107 (in 0.2 mL) |
Source: WHO NIBSCs (for all prequalified manufacturers'). Vaccine inserts: Plotkin’a Vaccines. 6th Edition.
WHO prequalified manufacturers used by UNICEF.
This is the amount spread onto the skin. Amount delivered intradermally is unknown but much less than this (Kemp et al. J Inf Dis 1996) (2 × 106 CFU for adults, 1 × 106 CFU for neonates based on assumptions that −10% of the dose enters the skin).
Fig. 1.BCG formulations exhibit differences in mycobacterial cell membrane integrity and RNA content as assessed by flow cytometry. (A) Representative dot-plot and (B) average percentage of live cells as a proportion out of all events captured. N = 5 experiments testing at least 2 different lots of each BCG formulation. (C) Histogram showing an overlay of BCG cytometric analysis using SYTO® RNA SelectTM Green Fluorescent Cell Stain. (D) Bar graph showing the % of RNA + cells per equal number of CFU. Unstained BCG USA was used as control. N = 4. Data are presented as mean +/ SD. Statistical significance denoted by one-way non-repeated measures ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD test. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.01, ****p < 0.001.
Fig. 2.Licensed BCG formulations differ markedly from one another in viability as measured by colony forming units (CFU) in diverse culture media. Six serial 10-fold dilutions of each BCG formulation were plated in (A) solid enriched 7H9 medium (e7H9) and (B) commercial Middlebrook 7H11 medium (M7H11) in triplicate, and colonies counted weekly for 6 weeks. In both media types, BCG-IND and -BUL demonstrated significantly lower viability (CFU) compared to the other BCG formulations. Moreover, BCG-BUL viability (CFU) was >100-fold lower than anticipated per label. (C) Growth of BCG-IND and -BUL was significantly lower (>100-fold) in e7H9 compared to M7H11 medium. Mean CFU per ampule of each candidate was calculated from the average colonies counted in independent experiments (N = 2–6) and also plotted against the anticipated mycobacterial growth based on the vaccine label. Data are presented as mean +/ SD. Statistical comparisons with ANOVA. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.01.
Fig. 3.(A) BCG-induced whole blood cytokine/chemokine pattern at 18 h differs significantly by age. Heat map depicts cytokines/chemokines after 18 h stimulation with equal CFU concentrations of BCG, calculated from the vaccine inserts. Repeated-measures one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc test. N = 4–9 for newborn and 8–13 for adult whole blood. (B) In NB, BCG-IND induced the weakest IFN-c responses compared to the other formulations. Box plots display medians and min-max values. Grey stars indicate comparisons against RPMI control (Kruskal-Wallis test). (C) BCG-induced hematopoietic factors and cytokines at concentrations reflecting human equivalent doses differ significantly by BCG formulation. Radar plots representing the BCG effect as a log-fold change over RPMI control. N = 6–10 for newborn and N = 7–11 for adult whole blood. NB, newborn; AD, adult. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
At concentrations reflecting human equivalent doses, BCG-DEN and BCG-JPN induced significantly higher levels of hematopoietic factors and Thl cytokines compared to BCG-IND and BCG-BUL.
| 6 h | 18 h | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted P value | Adjusted P value | |||||||||
| Mean log difference (CI:95%) | Mean log difference (Cl:95%) | |||||||||
| BCG formulation | ||||||||||
| DEN > JPN | DEN > IND | DEN > BUL | JPN > IND | JPN > BUL | DEN > JPN | DEN > IND | DEN > BUL | JPN > IND | IND > BUL | |
| NEWBORN | ||||||||||
| Cyto-/chemokine | ||||||||||
| G-CSF | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||
| GM-CSF | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||
| PDGF AB/BB | ns | 0.0042 1 (0.25;1.8) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
| VEGF | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| IL-lα | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
| IL-1β | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||
| IL-6 | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| IL-10 | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| TNFα | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| TNFγ | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| ADULT | ||||||||||
| CCL7 | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
| CXCL1 | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
| G-CSF | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||||
| PDGF AB/BB | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| VEGF | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| IL-lα | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||
| IL-lβ | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||
Statistically significant log-differences by BCG formulation calculated by ANOVA with Tukey correction. BCG USA was analyzed separately as its clinical indication and route of administration are different. N = 4–9 for NB; 5–11 for AD.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.
Fig. 4.(A) BCG formulations tested at equal CFU concentrations differ in induction of cytokines/chemokines. Radar plots represent the BCG effect as a log-fold change over RPMI control. (B) BCG-DEN induced significantly higher log-fold changes in CCL7, G-CSF, PDGF AB/BB, IL-1α and IL-1β compared to equal calculated CFU of the other BCG formulations. ANOVA with Tukey correction. N = 6–9 for NB; 10–11 for AD. NB, newborn; AD, adult.
Fig. 5.BCG cytokine-inducing activity significantly correlates with BCG viability. (A) Spearman correlations between CFU–cytokines produced in NB after 18 h BCG stimulation with concentrations reflecting human equivalent doses. (B) CFU-cytokine correlations for all cytokines/chemokines that were significantly changed over RPMI. NB = newborn; AD = adult.