Kameron J Moding1, Laura L Bellows2, Kevin J Grimm3, Susan L Johnson4. 1. Department of Human Development & Family Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States. Electronic address: kmoding@purdue.edu. 2. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States. 3. Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States. 4. Department of Pediatrics/Section of Nutrition, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Prompted engagement with a new food's sensory properties (smell, texture) has been associated with young children's acceptance of new foods. However, little is known about the prevalence and stability of children's sensory exploratory behaviors exhibited spontaneously when trying new foods. The aim of this analysis was to examine developmental trajectories of sensory exploratory behaviors (i.e., smelling, licking, spitting) in response to new foods. METHOD: This 3-year longitudinal study included observational data collected from 244 preschoolers. At age 4 years, children were asked to taste four novel foods. An experimenter recorded the child's displays of smelling, licking, spitting, refusals, and acceptance. Assessments were repeated at 4.5, 5.5, and 6.5 years of age. Summary scores were created for each child by totaling the number of foods smelled, licked, spit out, refused, and accepted at each time point. A series of growth models were fit to the summary scores to examine individual sensory behavior trajectories and associations between trajectories of sensory behaviors and acceptance. RESULTS: Linear growth model parameters indicated that spitting and refusals decreased over time (p-values < 0.01), whereas acceptances increased (p < 0.01). Licking and smelling showed non-significant change (p-values > 0.01) Furthermore, decreases in licking, spitting, and refusals were associated with increases in acceptance across the study period (p-values < 0.01). DISCUSSION: The decline in young children's sensory exploratory behaviors in response to new foods was associated with increases in food acceptance. Our findings suggest that sensory exploratory behaviors may promote familiarity and help children learn that new foods are acceptable and safe to consume.
OBJECTIVE: Prompted engagement with a new food's sensory properties (smell, texture) has been associated with young children's acceptance of new foods. However, little is known about the prevalence and stability of children's sensory exploratory behaviors exhibited spontaneously when trying new foods. The aim of this analysis was to examine developmental trajectories of sensory exploratory behaviors (i.e., smelling, licking, spitting) in response to new foods. METHOD: This 3-year longitudinal study included observational data collected from 244 preschoolers. At age 4 years, children were asked to taste four novel foods. An experimenter recorded the child's displays of smelling, licking, spitting, refusals, and acceptance. Assessments were repeated at 4.5, 5.5, and 6.5 years of age. Summary scores were created for each child by totaling the number of foods smelled, licked, spit out, refused, and accepted at each time point. A series of growth models were fit to the summary scores to examine individual sensory behavior trajectories and associations between trajectories of sensory behaviors and acceptance. RESULTS: Linear growth model parameters indicated that spitting and refusals decreased over time (p-values < 0.01), whereas acceptances increased (p < 0.01). Licking and smelling showed non-significant change (p-values > 0.01) Furthermore, decreases in licking, spitting, and refusals were associated with increases in acceptance across the study period (p-values < 0.01). DISCUSSION: The decline in young children's sensory exploratory behaviors in response to new foods was associated with increases in food acceptance. Our findings suggest that sensory exploratory behaviors may promote familiarity and help children learn that new foods are acceptable and safe to consume.
Authors: Shabnam R Momin; Sheryl O Hughes; Cindy Elias; Maria A Papaioannou; Mimi Phan; David Vides; Alexis C Wood Journal: Appetite Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Susan L Johnson; Sarah M Ryan; Miranda Kroehl; Kameron J Moding; Richard E Boles; Laura L Bellows Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Laura L Bellows; Susan L Johnson; Patricia L Davies; Jennifer Anderson; William J Gavin; Richard E Boles Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Kimberley A Baxter; Smita Nambiar; Tsz Hei Jeffrey So; Danielle Gallegos; Rebecca Byrne Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Morgan L McCloskey; Hannah Kesterson; Noereem Z Mena; Jennifer Dellaport; Laura L Bellows Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-19 Impact factor: 3.390