| Literature DB >> 31997717 |
Tsz Ho Kwan1,2, Ngai Sze Wong2, Grace Chung Yan Lui2,3, Kenny Chi Wai Chan4, Owen Tak Yin Tsang5, Wai Shing Leung5, Kai Man Ho5, Man Po Lee6, Wilson Lam6, Sze Nga Chan6, Denise Pui Chung Chan2, Shui Shan Lee2.
Abstract
Molecular surveillance of infections is essential in monitoring their transmission in the population. In this study, newly diagnosed HIV patients' phylogenetic, clinical and behavioural data were integrated, and an information diffusion model was incorporated in analysing transmission dynamics. A genetic network was constructed from HIV sequences, from which transmission cascades were extracted. From the transmission cascades, CRF01_AE had higher values of information diffusion metrics, including scale, speed and range, than that of B, signifying the distinct transmission patterns of two circulating subtypes in Hong Kong. Patients connected in the network, were more likely male, younger, of main circulating subtypes, to have acquired HIV infection locally, and a higher CD4 level at diagnosis. Genetic connections varied among men who have sex with men (MSM) who used different channels of sex networking and varied in their engagement in risk behaviours. MSM using recreational drugs for sex held positions of greater importance within the network. Significant differences in network metrics were observed among MSM as differentiated by their mobile apps usage patterns, evidencing the impact of social network on transmission networks. The applied model in the presence of consistently collected longitudinal data could enhance HIV molecular epidemiologic surveillance for informing future intervention planning.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; Molecular epidemiology; information diffusion; men who have sex with men; network analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31997717 PMCID: PMC7034068 DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1718554
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Microbes Infect ISSN: 2222-1751 Impact factor: 7.163
Figure 1.Analytical framework of the study.
Comparison between connected (n = 185) and unconnected (n = 253) sequences in the transmission network.
| Variable | Category | Total | Connected in the transmission network | Unconnected in the transmission network | Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Female | 17 (4%) | 2 (1%) | 15 (6%) | 1 | – |
| Male | 421 (96%) | 179 (99%) | 242 (94%) | 5.55 (1.25–24.57) | .01 | |
| Year of birth | – | <.001 | ||||
| Mode of transmission | Non-MSM | 54 (12%) | 10 (6%) | 43 (17%) | 1 | – |
| MSM | 384 (88%) | 171 (94%) | 213 (83%) | 3.45 (1.69–7.07) | <.001 | |
| HIV subtype | CRF01_AE | 145 (33%) | 70 (39%) | 75 (29%) | 1 | – |
| B | 145 (33%) | 76 (42%) | 69 (27%) | 1.18 (0.74–1.87) | .48 | |
| CRF07_BC | 61 (14%) | 13 (7%) | 48 (19%) | 0.29 (0.15-–0.58) | <.001 | |
| Others | 87 (20%) | 22 (12%) | 65 (25%) | 0.36 (0.20–0.65) | .001 | |
| Place of infection | Hong Kong | 323 (74%) | 159 (90%) | 164 (65%) | 1 | – |
| Mainland China | 51 (12%) | 7 (4%) | 44 (18%) | 0.16 (0.07–0.38) | <.001 | |
| Other | 64 (15%) | 15 (8%) | 49 (19%) | 0.32 (0.17–0.59) | <.001 | |
| Infection year | – | .26 | ||||
| Diagnosis year | – | .14 | ||||
| CD4 at diagnosis | – | .01 | ||||
| Viral load at diagnosis | – | .19 |
Notes: IQR interquartile range; MSM men who have sex with men.
Figure 2.Genetic network with route of transmission (a) and transmission cascades with subtype (b) of HIV sequences (n = 185).
Comparison between men who have sex with men (MSM) who were connected and unconnected in the transmission network (N = 384).
| Variable | Total | Connected in the transmission network | Unconnected in the transmission network | Odds ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year of birth | .001 | ||||
| Local infection (HIV transmission within Hong Kong) | 302 (79%) | 154 (90%) | 148 (69%) | 3.98 (2.23–7.10) | <.001 |
| Infection year | .30 | ||||
| Favoured sex networking channels before HIV diagnosis ( | |||||
| • Bars | 121 (32%) | 45 (27%) | 76 (36%) | 0.67 (0.43–1.04) | .07 |
| • Saunas | 176 (47%) | 67 (40%) | 109 (51%) | 0.64 (0.42–0.96) | .03 |
| • Public toilets | 41 (11%) | 12 (7%) | 29 (14%) | 0.49 (0.24–0.996) | .045 |
| • Beaches | 25 (7%) | 13 (8%) | 12 (6%) | 1.42 (0.63–3.19) | .40 |
| • Mobile apps | 274 (72%) | 129 (78%) | 145 (68%) | 1.61 (1.01–2.57) | .04 |
| In the year before infection | |||||
| • Used an international gay mobile app for sex networking ( | 226 (67%) | 116 (76%) | 110 (60%) | 2.17 (1.35–3.49) | .001 |
| • Used a mainland Chinese gay mobile app for sex networking ( | 33 (10%) | 6 (4%) | 27 (15%) | 0.24 (0.10–0.59) | .001 |
| • Engaged in chemsex ( | 227 (61%) | 76 (47%) | 68 (33%) | 1.80 (1.18–2.74) | .01 |
| Diagnosis year | 2017 (2016–2017) | 2016 (2017–2017) | 2017 (2017–2017) | .09 | |
| CD4 at diagnosis | 319 (209–437) | 338 (224–448) | 300 (187–410) | .04 | |
| Log viral load at diagnosis | .15 |
Note: IQR interquartile range.