| Literature DB >> 31997596 |
Wei Hua Yin1, Yan Zhang1,2, Xiang Nan Li1, Hong Yue Wang3, Yun Qiang An1, Yang Sun3, Zhi Hui Hou1, Yang Gao1, Bin Lu4, Zhe Zheng5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We sought to distinguish lipid plaques using a CT quantitative pixel density histogram, based on the pathological diagnosis of lipid cores as the gold standard.Entities:
Keywords: Coronary CT angiography; Lipid plaque; Quantitative histogram analysis
Year: 2020 PMID: 31997596 PMCID: PMC6992437 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Radiol ISSN: 1229-6929 Impact factor: 3.500
Fig. 1Example of CT quantitative pixel density histogram analysis of lipid and fibrous plaques.
A, D. Short-axis coronary CT angiography image with manual tracing of noncalcified plaques. B. X-axis of histogram analysis represents scale of CT value. Y-axis represents total number of CT value. There are 4 pixels with CT attenuation ≤ 30 HU, and 4412 is summation of number of pixels within CT low-density plaque. Therefore, percentage of pixels with CT attenuation ≤ 30 HU in histogram analysis is 0.1% (4/4412), which is below threshold of 3.0%. C. Fibrous plaque (arrow) was diagnosed pathologically. E. Percentage of pixel CT attenuation ≤ 30 HU in histogram analysis is 9.8% (175/1785), which is higher than threshold of 3.0%. F. Lipid core (arrow) was diagnosed pathologically.
Baseline Characteristics
| n = 8 | |
|---|---|
| Age (year) | 48.5 ± 11.6 (37–65) |
| Male | 8 (100) |
| Weight (kg) | 72.0 ± 8.4 (48.0–95.0) |
| Hypertension | 4 (50.0) |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 5 (62.5) |
| Smoking | 3 (37.5) |
| Diabetes | 3 (37.5) |
| Angina pectoris | 8 (100) |
| Family history | 2 (25.0) |
| Previous PCI | 4 (50.0) |
| Previous CABG | 1 (12.5) |
All parameters are expressed as mean standard deviation (range) or number (percentage). CABG = coronary artery bypass graft, PCI = percutaneous intervention
Fig. 2Scatter plot of mean CT attenuation (A) and percentage of pixels with attenuation ≤30 HU (B) for plaques identified as fibrous and lipid-core on pathological examination.
Fig. 3Excellent inter-observer reproducibility of measurements of mean CT attenuation (A, B) and percentage of pixel CT attenuation (C, D).
SD = standard deviation
Diagnostic Performance of Five Different Diagnostic Methods
| Parameter | AUROC | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of pixels with attenuation ≤ 20 HU | 0.822 | 76.9 | 81.3 | 87.0 | 68.4 |
| Percentage of pixels with attenuation ≤ 30 HU | 0.898 | 80.8 | 87.5 | 91.3 | 73.7 |
| Percentage of pixels with attenuation ≤ 40 HU | 0.703 | 73.1 | 68.8 | 79.2 | 61.1 |
| Percentage of pixels with attenuation ≤ 50 HU | 0.590 | 71.1 | 43.8 | 70.0 | 58.3 |
| Mean CT attenuation | 0.541 | 69.2 | 56.3 | 72.0 | 52.9 |
AUROC = under the receiver operating characteristic curve, NPV = negative predictive value, PPV = positive predictive value
Fig. 4Comparison of areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) by 5 methods.
AUROC by percentage method with percentage of pixels with attenuation ≤ 30 HU (blue line) was 0.898 (95% confidence interval is 0.765–0.970), which was significantly higher compared with other four methods (all p < 0.05).