| Literature DB >> 31996741 |
Emma Rocco1, Olivia Licata2, Isra Mahaboob3, Kasey Hogan3, Sean Tozier3, Vincent Meyers3, Benjamin McEwen3, Steven Novak3, Baishakhi Mazumder2, Michael Reshchikov4, L Douglas Bell5, F Shahedipour-Sandvik6.
Abstract
We report on the enhanced incorporation efficiency of magnesium dopants into facets of hexagonal hillock structures in N-polar GaN, studied by comparative analysis of GaN:Mg films grown by MOCVD on high and low hillock density GaN template layers. Total magnesium concentration in planar regions surrounding a hillock structure is comparable to that within hillock sidewall facets measured at 1.3 × 1019 cm-3 by atom probe tomography, and clustering of Mg atoms is seen in all regions of the film. Within individual hillock structures a decreased Mg cluster density is observed within hillock structures as opposed to the planar regions surrounding a hillock. Additionally, the Mg cluster radius is decreased within the hillock sidewall. The favorable incorporation of Mg is attributed to Mg dopants incorporating substitutionally for Ga during growth of semi-polar facets of the hillock structures. Enhanced p-type conductivity of GaN:Mg films grown on high hillock density template layers is verified by optical and electrical measurement.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31996741 PMCID: PMC6989458 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58275-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Optical micrographs of (a) low hillock and (b) high hillock density N-polar GaN template layers. Scale bar is equivalent.
Figure 2(a) Mg SIMS scan of GaN:Mg layers grown on low (dashed) and high (solid) hillock density template layers, (b) TOF-SIMS image of all ions collected from a single hillock structure shown on a thermal scale without depth profile sputter.
Figure 3APT reconstructions of tips from (S1) planar region surrounding hillock structure, (S2) beginning of hillock sidewall, and (S3) top of hillock sidewall. 3D atom maps include dark volumes encapsulating regions of segregation (clusters). Continuous dislocations were excluded for concentration and cluster number density calculations.
Figure 4Bar plot comparing Mg cluster number density and bulk concentration of Mg for all three sample tips. The standard error for each measurement is shown with error bars.
Figure 5Comparison of the cluster number densities with cluster size in samples (a) S1 (b) S2 and (c) S3. (d) Kernel distribution fits from comparison of cluster size and frequency.
Figure 6(a)Photoluminescence spectra of GaN:Mg films grown on low (blue) and high (red) hillock density template layers utilizing 0.11 W/cm2 excitation power density at 18 K, and (b) power intensity dependent photoluminescence spectra of GaN:Mg film grown on high hillock density template at 18 K with inset showing temperature dependence behavior of “blue band” intensity (red dots) with fit to Eq. (1) (blue solid line).
Figure 7Plots of 1/C2 vs. V, measured by Hg probe C-V, of GaN:Mg layers grown on high and low hillock density GaN template layers.