Junxiu Liu1, Colin D Rehm2, Renata Micha1, Dariush Mozaffarian1. 1. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Meals from full-service restaurants (FS) and fast-food restaurants (FF) are an integral part of US diets, but current levels and trends in consumption, healthfulness, and related sociodemographic disparities are not well characterized. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess patterns and nutritional quality (using validated American Heart Association [AHA] diet scores) of FS and FF meals consumed by US adults. METHODS: Serial cross-sectional investigation utilizing 24-h dietary recalls in survey-weighted, nationally representative samples of 35,015 adults aged ≥20 y from 7 NHANES cycles, 2003-2016. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2016, American adults consumed ∼21 percent of energyfrom restaurants (FS: 8.5% in 2003-2004, 9.5% in 2015-2016, P-trend = 0.38; FF: 10.5%; 13.4%, P-trend = 0.31). Over this period, more FF meals were eaten for breakfast (from 4.4% to 7.6% of all breakfasts, P-trend <0.001), with no changes for lunch (15.2% to 15.3%) or dinner (14.6% to 14.4%). In 2015-2016, diet quality of both FS and FF were low, with mean AHA diet scores of 31.6 and 27.6 (out of 80). Between 2003 and 2016, diet quality of FF meals improved slightly, (the percentage with poor quality went from 74.6% to 69.8%; and with intermediate quality, from 25.4% to 30.2%; P-trend <0.001 each). Proportions of FS meals of poor (∼50%) and intermediate (∼50%) quality were stable over time, with <0.1% of consumed FS or FF meals meeting ideal quality. Disparities in FS meal quality persisted by race/ethnicity, obesity status, and education and worsened by income; whereas disparities in FF meal quality persisted by age, sex, and obesity status and worsened by race/ethnicity, education, and income. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2003 and 2016, FF and FS meals provided 1 in 5 calories for US adults. Modest improvements occurred in nutritional quality of FF, but not FS, meals consumed, and the average quality for both remained low with persistent or widening disparities. These findings highlight the need for strategies to improve the nutritional quality of US restaurant meals.
BACKGROUND: Meals from full-service restaurants (FS) and fast-food restaurants (FF) are an integral part of US diets, but current levels and trends in consumption, healthfulness, and related sociodemographic disparities are not well characterized. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess patterns and nutritional quality (using validated American Heart Association [AHA] diet scores) of FS and FF meals consumed by US adults. METHODS: Serial cross-sectional investigation utilizing 24-h dietary recalls in survey-weighted, nationally representative samples of 35,015 adults aged ≥20 y from 7 NHANES cycles, 2003-2016. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2016, American adults consumed ∼21 percent of energyfrom restaurants (FS: 8.5% in 2003-2004, 9.5% in 2015-2016, P-trend = 0.38; FF: 10.5%; 13.4%, P-trend = 0.31). Over this period, more FF meals were eaten for breakfast (from 4.4% to 7.6% of all breakfasts, P-trend <0.001), with no changes for lunch (15.2% to 15.3%) or dinner (14.6% to 14.4%). In 2015-2016, diet quality of both FS and FF were low, with mean AHA diet scores of 31.6 and 27.6 (out of 80). Between 2003 and 2016, diet quality of FF meals improved slightly, (the percentage with poor quality went from 74.6% to 69.8%; and with intermediate quality, from 25.4% to 30.2%; P-trend <0.001 each). Proportions of FS meals of poor (∼50%) and intermediate (∼50%) quality were stable over time, with <0.1% of consumed FS or FF meals meeting ideal quality. Disparities in FS meal quality persisted by race/ethnicity, obesity status, and education and worsened by income; whereas disparities in FF meal quality persisted by age, sex, and obesity status and worsened by race/ethnicity, education, and income. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2003 and 2016, FF and FS meals provided 1 in 5 calories for US adults. Modest improvements occurred in nutritional quality of FF, but not FS, meals consumed, and the average quality for both remained low with persistent or widening disparities. These findings highlight the need for strategies to improve the nutritional quality of US restaurant meals.
Authors: Johannah M Frelier; Alyssa J Moran; Kelsey A Vercammen; Marian P Jarlenski; Sara N Bleich Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Vivica Kraak; Sofia Rincón-Gallardo Patiño; Deepthi Renukuntla; Eojina Kim Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Junxiu Liu; Dariush Mozaffarian; Tom Gaziano; Renata Micha; Stephen Sy; Yujin Lee; Parke E Wilde; Shafika Abrahams-Gessel Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2020-06-04
Authors: Sheila E Fleischhacker; Catherine E Woteki; Paul M Coates; Van S Hubbard; Grace E Flaherty; Daniel R Glickman; Thomas R Harkin; David Kessler; William W Li; Joseph Loscalzo; Anand Parekh; Sylvia Rowe; Patrick J Stover; Angie Tagtow; Anthony Joon Yun; Dariush Mozaffarian Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Desiree M Sigala; Marissa G Hall; Aviva A Musicus; Christina A Roberto; Sarah E Solar; Sili Fan; Sarah Sorscher; DeAnna Nara; Jennifer Falbe Journal: Prev Med Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 4.637
Authors: Megan P Mueller; Eleanor T Shonkoff; Sara C Folta; Stephanie Anzman-Frasca; Christina D Economos Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 5.717