Literature DB >> 31993892

An effective pressure-flow characterization of respiratory asynchronies in mechanical ventilation.

Alberto Casagrande1, Francesco Quintavalle2, Rafael Fernandez3, Lluis Blanch4,5, Massimo Ferluga2, Enrico Lena2, Francesco Fabris6, Umberto Lucangelo2.   

Abstract

Ineffective effort during expiration (IEE) occurs when there is a mismatch between the demand of a mechanically ventilated patient and the support delivered by a Mechanical ventilator during the expiration. This work presents a pressure-flow characterization for respiratory asynchronies and validates a machine-learning method, based on the presented characterization, to identify IEEs. 1500 breaths produced by 8 mechanically-ventilated patients were considered: 500 of them were included into the training set and the remaining 1000 into the test set. Each of them was evaluated by 3 experts and classified as either normal, artefact, or containing inspiratory, expiratory, or cycling-off asynchronies. A software implementing the proposed method was trained by using the experts' evaluations of the training set and used to identify IEEs in the test set. The outcomes were compared with a consensus of three expert evaluations. The software classified IEEs with sensitivity 0.904, specificity 0.995, accuracy 0.983, positive and negative predictive value 0.963 and 0.986, respectively. The Cohen's kappa is 0.983 (with 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.884, 0.962]). The pressure-flow characterization of respiratory cycles and the monitoring technique proposed in this work automatically identified IEEs in real-time in close agreement with the experts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic monitoring; Machine learning; Mechanical ventilator; Respiratory asynchrony

Year:  2020        PMID: 31993892     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-020-00469-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  2 in total

Review 1.  Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony during assisted invasive mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  G Murias; A Villagra; L Blanch
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Ineffective triggering predicts increased duration of mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Marjolein de Wit; Kristin B Miller; David A Green; Henry E Ostman; Chris Gennings; Scott K Epstein
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 7.598

  2 in total
  4 in total

1.  Pressure-flow breath representation eases asynchrony identification in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Alberto Casagrande; Francesco Quintavalle; Enrico Lena; Francesco Fabris; Umberto Lucangelo
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 1.977

2.  Timing of inspiratory muscle activity detected from airway pressure and flow during pressure support ventilation: the waveform method.

Authors:  Francesco Mojoli; Marco Pozzi; Anita Orlando; Isabella M Bianchi; Eric Arisi; Giorgio A Iotti; Antonio Braschi; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Reconstructing asynchrony for mechanical ventilation using a hysteresis loop virtual patient model.

Authors:  Cong Zhou; J Geoffrey Chase; Qianhui Sun; Jennifer Knopp; Merryn H Tawhai; Thomas Desaive; Knut Möller; Geoffrey M Shaw; Yeong Shiong Chiew; Balazs Benyo
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 4.  What is new in respiratory monitoring?

Authors:  Dan S Karbing; Steffen Leonhardt; Gaetano Perchiazzi; Jason H T Bates
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 1.977

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.