Haruki Funao1, Floreana N Kebaish1, Richard L Skolasky1, Khaled M Kebaish2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. editorialservices@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Three-column osteotomies at L5 or the sacrum (LS3COs) are technically challenging, yet they may be needed to treat lumbosacral kyphotic deformities. We investigated radiographic and clinical outcomes after LS3CO. METHODS: We analyzed 25 consecutive patients (mean age 56 years) who underwent LS3CO with minimum 2-year follow-up. Standing radiographs and health-related quality-of-life scores were evaluated. A new radiographic parameter ["lumbosacral angle" (LSA)] was introduced to evaluate sagittal alignment distal to the S1 segment. RESULTS: From preoperatively to the final follow-up, significant improvements occurred in lumbar lordosis (from - 34° to - 49°), LSA (from 0.5° to 22°), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (from 18 to 7.3 cm) (all, p < .01). Mean Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r scores in activity, pain, self-image, and satisfaction (p < .05), and Oswestry Disability Index scores (p < .01) also improved significantly. Patients with SVA ≥ 5 cm at the final follow-up experienced less improvement in SRS-22r satisfaction scores than those with SVA < 5 cm. Patients with LSA < 20° at the final follow-up had significantly lower SRS-22r activity scores than those with LSA ≥ 20° (p = .014). Two patients had transient neurologic deficits, and 11 patients underwent revision for proximal junctional kyphosis (5), pseudarthrosis (3), junctional stenosis (2), or neurologic deficit (1). CONCLUSIONS: LS3CO produced radiographic and clinical improvements. However, patients who remained sagittally imbalanced had less improvement in SRS-22r satisfaction score than those whose sagittal imbalance was corrected, and patients who maintained kyphotic deformity in the lumbosacral spine had lower SRS-22r activity scores than those whose lumbosacral kyphosis was corrected. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
PURPOSE: Three-column osteotomies at L5 or the sacrum (LS3COs) are technically challenging, yet they may be needed to treat lumbosacral kyphotic deformities. We investigated radiographic and clinical outcomes after LS3CO. METHODS: We analyzed 25 consecutive patients (mean age 56 years) who underwent LS3CO with minimum 2-year follow-up. Standing radiographs and health-related quality-of-life scores were evaluated. A new radiographic parameter ["lumbosacral angle" (LSA)] was introduced to evaluate sagittal alignment distal to the S1 segment. RESULTS: From preoperatively to the final follow-up, significant improvements occurred in lumbar lordosis (from - 34° to - 49°), LSA (from 0.5° to 22°), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (from 18 to 7.3 cm) (all, p < .01). Mean Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r scores in activity, pain, self-image, and satisfaction (p < .05), and Oswestry Disability Index scores (p < .01) also improved significantly. Patients with SVA ≥ 5 cm at the final follow-up experienced less improvement in SRS-22r satisfaction scores than those with SVA < 5 cm. Patients with LSA < 20° at the final follow-up had significantly lower SRS-22r activity scores than those with LSA ≥ 20° (p = .014). Two patients had transient neurologic deficits, and 11 patients underwent revision for proximal junctional kyphosis (5), pseudarthrosis (3), junctional stenosis (2), or neurologic deficit (1). CONCLUSIONS:LS3CO produced radiographic and clinical improvements. However, patients who remained sagittally imbalanced had less improvement in SRS-22r satisfaction score than those whose sagittal imbalance was corrected, and patients who maintained kyphotic deformity in the lumbosacral spine had lower SRS-22r activity scores than those whose lumbosacral kyphosis was corrected. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Authors: Samuel K Cho; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Jin-Seok Yi; Joshua M Pahys; Lukas P Zebala; Matthew M Kang; Woojin Cho; Christine R Baldus Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Marcin Czyz; Stephen Forster; James Holton; Babak Shariati; David J Clarkson; Bronek M Boszczyk Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2017-07-07 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: R Chris Glattes; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Yongjung J Kim; Anthony Rinella; Charles Edwards Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Gene Cheh; Christine Baldus Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Hamid Hassanzadeh; Amit Jain; Mostafa H El Dafrawy; Addisu Mesfin; Philip R Neubauer; Richard L Skolasky; Khaled M Kebaish Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Frank J Schwab; Benjamin Blondel; Shay Bess; Richard Hostin; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Douglas C Burton; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Gregory M Mundis; Christopher P Ames; Khaled Kebaish; Robert A Hart; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Caglar Yilgor; Nuray Sogunmez; Louis Boissiere; Yasemin Yavuz; Ibrahim Obeid; Frank Kleinstück; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Emre Acaroglu; Sleiman Haddad; Anne F Mannion; Ferran Pellise; Ahmet Alanay Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Anouar Bourghli; Louis Boissiere; Thomas Chevillotte; Maxime Huneidi; Clement Silvestre; Kariman Abelin-Genevois; Pierre Grobost; Javier Pizones; Pierre Roussouly; Ibrahim Obeid Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2021-09-29 Impact factor: 3.134