| Literature DB >> 31993377 |
Fabiana Nakashima1, Valquíria Sousa Pardo1, Marcos Paulo Miola1,2, Fernando Henrique Antunes Murata3, Natalia Paduan1, Stefani Miqueline Longo1, Cinara Cássia Brandão de Mattos1,3, Vera Lucia Pereira-Chioccola4, Octávio Ricci2, Luiz Carlos de Mattos1,3.
Abstract
Background: Toxoplasma gondii infects millions of individuals worldwide. This protozoan is food and water-borne transmitted but blood transfusion and organ transplantation constitute alternative forms for transmission. However, the influence of IgG anti-T. gondii antibodies in molecular analysis carried out in peripheral blood still remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the serum IgG anti-T. gondii antibody concentrations correlate Nested PCR results in blood donors.Entities:
Keywords: Nested PCR; Toxoplasma gondii; blood donation and transfusion; blood donnors; molecular diagnosis; serology; serology assay; transfusion
Year: 2020 PMID: 31993377 PMCID: PMC6970978 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Serology results and the interpretation of the serological profiles and Nested PCR for blood donors.
| IgM+/IgG− | 5 | 0.6 | Recent infection | 3 | 0.6 | 2 | 0.8 | 0.721 | 0.119–4.349 | 0.662 |
| IgM+/IgG+ | 21 | 2.8 | Recent infection | 19 | 3.7 | 2 | 0.8 | 4.721 | 1.090–20.440 | 0.030 |
| IgM−/IgG+ | 335 | 44.7 | Chronic infection | 233 | 46.0 | 102 | 41.8 | 1.188 | 0.872–1.618 | 0.308 |
| IgM−/IgG− | 389 | 51.9 | Non-immunized | 251 | 49.7 | 138 | 56.6 | 0.756 | 0.556–1.028 | 0.086 |
| Total | 750 | 100.0 | 506 | 244 | ||||||
According to Montoya (2002).
Calculated by exact Fisher's test.
Figure 1Electrophoretic profile of fragments of B1 gene from T. gondii genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood of blood donors, amplified by Nested PCR. In (A), the first amplification is showing a fragment of 288 base pairs; in (B), the second amplification is showing a fragment of 115 base pairs. M, molecular marker; PC, Positive Control; CN, Negative Control.
Mean age, median, range, normal distribution, IgG anti-T. gondii antibodies concentrations according to Nested PCR Positive and Negative in male and female healthy blood donors.
| Mean age ± SD | 37.7 ± 11.2 | 38.7 ± 11.9 | 37.9 ± 10.9 | 35.0 ± 10.5 |
| Median | 38 | 33 | 37 | 34 |
| Range | 19–60 | 23–52 | 18–65 | 18–59 |
| 25th Percentile (range) | 28 (19–37) | 23 (23–32) | 28 (18–36) | 27 (18–33) |
| 75th Percentile (range) | 47 (39–60) | 51 (50–52) | 46 (38–65) | 43 (34–59) |
| Normal distribution | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| IgG+ | ||||
| IgG ± SD (UI/mL) | 196.0 ± 35.2 | 165.6 ± 62.7 | 204.0 ± 33.2 | 196.6 ± 39.5 |
| Median | 205.6 | 186.8 | 208.3 | 205.9 |
| Range | 66.1–232.1 | 36.1–222.8 | 21.4–257.3 | 55.2–244.7 |
| 25th Percentile (range) | 171.9 (66.1–202.1) | 145.1 (36.1–168.9) | 180.1 (21.4–208.2) | 169.6 (55.2–205.8) |
| 75th Percentile (range) | 219.5 (206.0–232.1) | 212.5 (186.9–222.8) | 227.9 (208.4–257.3) | 223.6 (205.9–244.7) |
| Normal distribution | No | Yes | No | No |
OBS: Male-PCR+ vs. Male-PCR–: p = 0.2252 (Mann–Whitney U′ = 3,887.0); Female-PCR+ vs. Female-PCR–: p = 0.0960 (Mann–Whitney U′ = 454.00); Male-PCR+ vs. Female-PCR+: p = 0.1065 (Mann–Whitney U′ = 152.00); Male-PCR– vs. Female-PCR–: p = 0.2486 (Mann–Whitney U′ = 11,241.00).