| Literature DB >> 31992357 |
Tao Wu1,2, Zhi-Wei Zhang3, Shiwei Li1, Bo Wang1, Zhijun Yang1,2, Peng Li1, Jing Zhang2, Wei-Min Tong3, Chunde Li1,2, Fu Zhao1,2, Yamei Niu4, Pinan Liu5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) is a novel epigenetic mark and may be involved in the mechanisms of tumorigenesis and malignant transformation. However, the role of 5hmC in ependymoma, the third most common brain tumor in children, remains unclear. The aim of this study sought to identify the characterization of 5hmC levels in pediatric posterior fossa ependymoma and to evaluate whether 5hmC levels could be a potential factor to predict clinical outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: 1q gain; 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine; Epigenetics; Ki-67 index; Molecular subgroup; Pediatric ependymoma; Prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31992357 PMCID: PMC6988368 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-020-0809-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Epigenetics ISSN: 1868-7075 Impact factor: 6.551
Clinical characteristics of pediatric posterior fossa ependymoma
| Characteristics | Value (%) |
|---|---|
| Demographics | |
| No. of patients | 45 |
| Age, years, median (range) | 4 (1–17) |
| Gender, (female/male) | 12/33 |
| Tumor size, cm, median (range) | 4.7 (2.3–19.5) |
| Extent of surgery, GTR, | 21 (46.7) |
| Radiotherapy, yes, | 29 (64.4) |
| Chemotherapy, yes, | 12 (26.7) |
| Histology, | |
| WHO II | 10 (22.2) |
| WHO III | 35 (77.8) |
| Ki-67 index, | |
| < 20% | 20 (44.4) |
| ≥ 20% | 25 (55.6) |
| Molecular subgroups, | |
| EPN_PFA | 35 (77.8) |
| EPN_PFB | 10 (22.2) |
| Chromosome 1q | |
| Gain | 16 (35.6) |
| No gain | 29 (64.4) |
| 5hmC/(C + mC) × 100%, median (range) | 0.127 (0.028–0.341) |
| 5mC/(C + mC) × 100%, mean ± SD | 3.664 ± 0.426 |
| Recurrence, | 25 (55.6) |
| Death during follow-up, | 23 (51.1) |
| Follow-up period, months, median (range) | 38 (6–60) |
GTR gross total resection, 5hmC 5- hydroxymethylcytosine, 5mC 5-methylcytosine, C cytosine, EPN_PFA Group A posterior fossa ependymoma, EPN_PFB Group B posterior fossa ependymoma
Fig. 1Comparative evaluation of 5hmC levels and 5mC levels as measured by UHPLC-MS/MS was respectively analyzed between tumors and normal cerebellum (a, b), two molecular subgroups (c, d), two age groups (e, f) and two subtypes of 1q status in (g, h). Bars, standard deviation. *P < 0.05; ****P < 0.0001. 5hmC by Mann–Whitney U test, 5mC by Student’s t test
Fig. 25hmC, 5mC, and Ki-67 index IHC staining in EPN_PF samples and normal cerebellum. a Representative image of 5hmC, 5mC, and Ki-67 staining in EPN_PF and cerebellum. b The Pearson correlation between nuclear positive cells of 5hmC and global 5hmC levels. c The Pearson correlation between Ki-67 index cells and global 5hmC levels. d The Pearson correlation between Ki-67 index and nuclear positive cells of 5hmC. Scale bars represent 100 μm
Fig. 3Kaplan–Meier survival analysis comparing PFS and OS for a, b low 5hmC group vs. high 5hmC group. c, d EPN_PFA vs. EPN_PFB. e, f Low Ki-67 index group vs. high Ki-67 index group. g, h No 1q gain group vs. 1q gain group. P value determined using the log-rank test
Univariate cox analysis for progression-free survival and overall survival for pediatric EPN_PF
| Progression-free survival | Overall survival | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | ||
| Mo. subgroup (EPN_PFA vs. EPN_PFB) | 8.012 | 1.815–35.371 | 10.854 | 1.446–81.465 | ||
| 5hmC subgroup (high vs. low) | 3.438 | 1.367–8.646 | 3.030 | 1.192–7.702 | ||
| Resection (STR vs. GTR) | 1.338 | 0.602–2.972 | 0.475 | 1.445 | 0.634–3.292 | 0.381 |
| Ki-67 index (≥ 20% vs. < 20%) | 3.726 | 1.475–9.427 | 1.787 | 0.921–3.468 | 0.086 | |
| 1q gain (yes vs. no) | 2.666 | 1.086–6.548 | 3.148 | 1.283–7.722 | ||
| Age, years (< 4 vs. 4–18) | 1.567 | 0.678–3.618 | 0.293 | 1.376 | 0.580–3.262 | 0.469 |
| Radiotherapy (yes vs. no) | 0.695 | 0.281–1.717 | 0.430 | 0.477 | 0.197–1.159 | 0.102 |
| Chemotherapy (yes vs. no) | 0.839 | 0.334–2.112 | 0.710 | 0.226 | 0.052–0.985 | 0.053 |
| Histology (WHO III vs. WHO II) | 2.115 | 0.760–5.885 | 0.151 | 2.938 | 0.855–10.104 | 0.087 |
| Gender (male vs. female) | 1.416 | 0.530–3.783 | 0.487 | 1.015 | 0.400–2.577 | 0.975 |
P values in italics are of statistical significance
Abbreviations: Mo. molecular, PF posterior fossa, STR subtotal resection, GTR gross total resection, EPN_PFA Group A posterior fossa ependymoma, EPN_PFB Group B posterior fossa ependymoma
Multivariate cox analysis for progression-free survival and overall survival for pediatric EPN_PF
| Progression-free survival | Overall survival | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | ||
| Mo. subgroup (EPN_PFA vs. EPN_PFB) | 5.253 | 1.052–26.237 | 7.496 | 0.928–60.557 | ||
| 5hmC subgroup (high vs. low) | 3.014 | 1.040–8.738 | 2.788 | 0.974–7.982 | ||
| Resection (STR vs. GTR) | 2.292 | 0.919–5.719 | 0.075 | 2.682 | 1.168–7.664 | |
P values in italics are of statistical significance
Abbreviations: Mo. molecular, STR subtotal resection, GTR gross total resection, EPN_PFAGroup A posterior fossa ependymoma, EPN_PFB Group B posterior fossa ependymoma