Literature DB >> 31992250

Women's knowledge of and attitudes toward cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening in Zanzibar, Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.

Qiao Weng1,2, Jie Jiang3, Fatma Mrisho Haji4, Lamlet Hassan Nondo4, Huaijun Zhou5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among women in Tanzania. Knowledge of and willingness to receive a cervical cancer screening are important determinants of prevention. This study aimed to describe women's awareness of cervical cancer and to explore the attitudes toward, acceptability of and barriers to cervical cancer screening (CCS) in Zanzibar.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to June 2018 involving 1483 women from 10 districts in Zanzibar who responded to questionnaires concerning their general demo-graphic characteristics, screening willingness and awareness of cervical cancer. Chi-square tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and stepwise multiple regression were conducted using STATA 15.1 software.
RESULTS: The average total knowledge score (TKS) was 7.84 ± 5.32 on a 23-point scale. Educational level and family income were positively correlated with the TKS. Previous schistosomiasis history and family genetic disease history were strong predictors of screening willingness. Women were less likely to be screened freely if they had 7 or more deliveries and were unaware of any previous family tumor history. Age and educational level were negatively associated non-free screening willingness, while family income was positively associated; being divorced/widowed or single and being unaware of any previous family tumor history were predictors of screening reluctance, while previous disease history was a strong predictor of non-free screening willingness. Fear of screening and inconvenience were the primary concerns among the Zanzibari interviewees. Compared to the 20-49 age group, more women in the less than 20 and 50 or more age groups thought cervical cancer screening was not necessary. The highest rate of cognitive accuracy in regard to cervical cancer warning signs and risk factors was only 37.76%.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings revealed that knowledge of cervical cancer was poor. Educational level, family income and awareness of previous disease history were significant influencing factors of screening uptake. Specific awareness programs to increase knowledge of cervical cancer and screening willingness should be designed and implemented in the public without delay, especially for younger and elderly women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Knowledge; Screening; Zanzibar

Year:  2020        PMID: 31992250     DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6528-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


  10 in total

1.  Improving intervention design to promote cervical cancer screening among hard-to-reach women: assessing beliefs and predicting individual attendance probabilities in Bogotá, Colombia.

Authors:  David Barrera Ferro; Steffen Bayer; Sally Brailsford; Honora Smith
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Tanzanian women´s knowledge about Cervical Cancer and HPV and their prevalence of positive VIA cervical screening results. Data from a Prevention and Awareness Campaign in Northern Tanzania, 2017 - 2019.

Authors:  Antje Henke; Ulrike Kluge; Theda Borde; Bariki Mchome; Furaha Serventi; Oliver Henke
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.640

3.  Factors associated with cervical cancer screening behaviour of women attending gynaecological clinics in Kazakhstan: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Torgyn Issa; Aisha Babi; Azliyati Azizan; Raushan Alibekova; Saleem A Khan; Alpamys Issanov; Chee Kai Chan; Gulzhanat Aimagambetova
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

4.  Expression analysis of p16 and TOP2A protein biomarkers in cervical cancer lesions and their correlation with clinico-histopathological characteristics in a referral hospital, Tanzania.

Authors:  Zavuga Zuberi; Alex Mremi; Jaffu O Chilongola; George Semango; Elingarami Sauli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of mobile health applications for cervical cancer in the digital marketplace.

Authors:  Jakkapop Kanjak; Naratassapol Likitdee; Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Amornrat Temtanakitpaisan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2022-04-05

6.  Disparities in the increases of cervical cancer incidence rates: observations from a city-wide population-based study.

Authors:  Ke Li; Huan Xu; Suixiang Wang; Pengzhe Qin; Boheng Liang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Understanding no-show behaviour for cervical cancer screening appointments among hard-to-reach women in Bogotá, Colombia: A mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  David Barrera Ferro; Steffen Bayer; Laura Bocanegra; Sally Brailsford; Adriana Díaz; Elena Valentina Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez; Honora Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Women's Preference for Cervical Cancer Screening Methods in Iran: A Contingent Valuation Survey.

Authors:  Anahita Shokri Jamnani Shokri Jamnani; Aziz Rezapour; Najmeh Moradi; Mostafa Langarizadeh
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2022-06-30

9.  Willingness to utilize cervical cancer screening among Ethiopian women aged 30-65 years.

Authors:  Adugna Alemu Desta; Fikadu Tolesa Alemu; Moges Beya Gudeta; Dejene Edosa Dirirsa; Andualem Gezahegn Kebede
Journal:  Front Glob Womens Health       Date:  2022-08-30

Review 10.  Willingness to pay for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anahita Shokri Jamnani; Aziz Rezapour; Najmeh Moradi; Mostafa Langarizadeh
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2021-06-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.