| Literature DB >> 31991906 |
Katharine Valéria Saraiva Hodel1, Larissa Moraes Dos Santos Fonseca1, Isa Moreira da Silva Santos2, Jamile Costa Cerqueira1, Raimundo Evangelista Dos Santos-Júnior2, Silmar Baptista Nunes2, Josiane Dantas Viana Barbosa1, Bruna Aparecida Souza Machado1.
Abstract
Bacterial cellulose (BC) has received considerable attention due to its unique properties, including an ultrafine network structure with high purity, mechanical strength, inherent biodegradability, biocompatibility, high water-holding capacity and high crystallinity. These properties allow BC to be used in biomedical and industrial applications, such as medical product. This research investigated the production of BC by Gluconacetobacter hansenii ATCC 23769 using different carbon sources (glucose, mannitol, sucrose and xylose) at two different concentrations (25 and 50 g∙L-1). The BC produced was used to develop a biocomposite with montmorillonite (MMT), a clay mineral that possesses interesting characteristics for enhancing BC physical-chemical properties, at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3% concentrations. The resulting biocomposites were characterized in terms of their physical and barrier properties, morphologies, water-uptake capacities, and thermal stabilities. Our results show that bacteria presented higher BC yields in media with higher glucose concentrations (50 g∙L-1) after a 14-day incubation period. Additionally, the incorporation of MMT significantly improved the mechanical and thermal properties of the BC membranes. The degradation temperature of the composites was extended, and a decrease in the water holding capacity (WHC) and an improvement in the water release rate (WRR) were noted. Determining a cost-effective medium for the production of BC and the characterization of the produced composites are extremely important for the biomedical applications of BC, such as in wound dressing materials.Entities:
Keywords: Gluconacetobacter hansenii; bacterial cellulose; biocomposites; carbon sources; ex situ production; montmorillonite; wound dressing
Year: 2020 PMID: 31991906 PMCID: PMC7077264 DOI: 10.3390/polym12020267
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Complete methodology used for BC and BC-MMT biocomposite production and characterization.
Media components and concentration.
| Medium Components | Culture Medium (%, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
| Glucose | 25.0 | 50.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mannitol | - | - | 25.0 | 50.0 | - | - | - | - |
| Sucrose | - | - | - | - | 25.0 | 50.0 | - | - |
| Xylose | - | - | - | - | - | - | 25.0 | 50.0 |
| Peptone | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Yeast extract | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| KH2PO4 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Legend Table 1: (-) Not added.
Sample name and montmorillonite (MMT) concentration of biocomposites.
| Sample Name | MMT Concentration (%) |
|---|---|
| BC | 0.0 |
| BC-MMT0.5 | 0.5 |
| BC-MMT1 | 1.0 |
| BC-MMT2 | 2.0 |
Experimental program of pure BC and BC-MMT biocomposite analysis.
| Specimen | MMT Concentration (%) | Test Types | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical/Barriers | Morphological | Thermal | ||
| BC | 0.0 | Water Activity Water Absorption Capacity | Scanning Electron Microscopy | Thermogravimetric Analysis |
| BC-MMT0.5 | 0.5 | |||
| BC-MMT1 | 1.0 | |||
| BC-MMT2 | 2.0 | |||
Figure 2Effect of different carbon sources at 25 g∙L−1 (a) and 50 g∙L−1 (b) concentrations on bacterial growth over time. BC was fermented by static culture for a 14-day period.
Figure 3BC produced by G. hansenii: (a) BC produced in glucose-containing media after a 14-day incubation period; (b) pure BC membrane after purification process.
Comparison of reports of BC production by G. hansenii in various media.
| Microorganism | Carbon Source | Supplementary Materials | Culture Time (Days) | Culture Method | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G. | Fructose | Glacial acetic acid | 7 | Static | [ |
| G. | Glucose | - | 10 | Static | [ |
| G. | Glucose | Galactose | 7 | _ | [ |
| G. | Glucose | Cellulose nanofibril | 9 | Static/Agitated | [ |
| G. | Mannitol | D-(+)-glucose | 7 | Static | [ |
| G. | Glucose | - | 5 | Static | [ |
| G. | Mannitol | - | 14 | Agitated | [ |
| G. | Sucrose | CaCl2 | 5 | Agitated | [ |
| G. | Glucose Acetylated glucose Molasses | Corn steep liquor | 10 | Static | [ |
| G. | Glucose | Hydrolysate of waste beer yeast | 10 | Static | [ |
Physical and barrier properties of flexible formulations of pure BC and BC-MMT composites. No significant difference between values with the same superscript letter (a,b,c) in a column (p > 0.05), according to Tukey’s test with 95% confidence.
| Sample | Water activity | Grammage | Thickness | Water Holding Capacity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | 0.479b ± 0.002 | 0.047c ± 0.005 | 81.250c ± 11.242 | 87.729a ± 4.032 |
| BC-MMT0.5 | 0.529a ± 0.002 | 0.113b ± 0.016 | 133.667b ± 15.462 | 46.023b ± 3.497 |
| BC-MMT1 | 0.519a ± 0.006 | 0.153ab ± 0.045 | 145.667b ± 8.221 | 34.550bc ± 3.930 |
| BC-MMT2 | 0.516a ± 0.002 | 0.209a ± 0.054 | 162.333a ± 2.571 | 29.514c ± 7.165 |
Figure 4Physical and barrier properties: (a) Water activity (aw) content; (b) Water absorption; (c) Water holding capacity (WHC); (d) Water release test (WRR); (e) Grammage; and (f) Thickness of pure BC and BC-MMT biocomposites. No significant difference between values with the same superscript numbers (1, 2, 3) in a bar (p > 0.05), according to Tukey’s test with 95% confidence.
Figure 5Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves for BC and BC–MMT composites. The composites (BC–MMT1, BC–MMT2 and BC–MMT3) were prepared by impregnation of BC sheets in respective concentrations (0.5, 1 and 2%) of MMT suspensions.
Figure 6Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the surface and cross-section morphology of pure BC: (a) 3300×; (b) 5000×.
Figure 7Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the surface and cross section morphology of: (a) ×3000 and (b) ×160 BC-MMT0.5; (c) ×3000 and (d) ×230 BC–MMT2.