| Literature DB >> 31991792 |
Ignasi Azagra-Boronat1,2, Alba Tres2,3, Malén Massot-Cladera1,2, Àngels Franch1,2, Margarida Castell1,2, Francesc Guardiola2,3, Francisco J Pérez-Cano1,2, Maria J Rodríguez-Lagunas1,2.
Abstract
The present study aimed to analyze the Species">rat breast milk profile ofEntities:
Keywords: breast milk; fatty acids; immune system; microbiota; rat
Year: 2020 PMID: 31991792 PMCID: PMC7071194 DOI: 10.3390/nu12020319
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Fatty acids (FA) composition of milk and plasma of dams and pups.
| (%) | Dams’ Plasma | Milk | Pups’ Plasma |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 40.93 ± 0.27 | 63.88 ± 1.69 | 42.50 ± 0.44 |
| 8:0 | - | 2.06 ± 0.17 | - |
| 10:0 | - | 7.90 ± 0.42 | 0.72 ± 0.07 |
| 12:0 | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 9.53 ± 0.37 | 2.19 ± 0.13 |
| 14:0 | 0.59 ± 0.03 | 12.47 ± 0.57 | 3.95 ± 0.16 |
| 15:0 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.01 |
| 16:0 | 21.18 ± 0.47 | 28.22 ± 0.89 | 24.62 ± 0.29 |
| 17:0 | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.01 |
| 18:0 | 17.27 ± 0.24 | 3.23 ± 0.06 | 10.12 ± 0.19 |
| 20:0 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.01 |
| 22:0 | 0.47 ± 0.06 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.01 |
|
| 15.35 ± 0.77 | 16.31 ± 1.21 | 10.73 ± 0.38 |
| 16:1 | 1.37 ± 0.12 | 1.11 ± 0.23 | 0.51 ± 0.02 |
| 18:1 | 1.24 ± 0.09 | 1.02 ± 0.16 | 0.96 ± 0.02 |
| 18:1 | 12.49 ± 0.70 | 13.69 ± 0.85 | 8.90 ± 0.37 |
| 20:1 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.36 ± 0.10 |
|
| 43.73 ± 0.84 | 18.39 ± 0.55 | 41.42 ± 0.41 |
| 18:2 | 21.10 ± 0.76 | 16.09 ± 0.40 | 20.67 ± 021 |
| 18:3 | 0.64 ± 0.06 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.49 ± 0.02 |
| 20:2 | 0.30 ± 0.07 | 0.39 ± 0.07 | 0.30 ± 0.02 |
| 20:3 | - | 0.33 ± 0.03 | 1.09 ± 0.04 |
| 20:4 | 18.34 ± 0.89 | 0.93 ± 0.05 | 19.97 ± 0.43 |
| 22:4 | - | 0.24 ± 0.05 | - |
| 22:5 | - | 0.07 ± 0.01 | - |
|
| 3.35 ± 0.20 | 1.30 ± 0.05 | 3.26 ± 0.11 |
| 18:3 | 0.38 ± 0.06 | 0.90 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.02 |
| 20:3 | 1.34 ± 0.20 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | - |
| 20:5 | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.02 |
| 22:5 | - | 0.10 ± 0.02 | - |
| 22:6 | 1.11 ± 0.10 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 2.78 ± 0.12 |
|
| 12.18 ± 0.58 | 14.14 ± 0.12 | 12.96 ± 0.37 |
|
| 43.73 ± 0.84 | 19.69 ± 0.59 | 45.77 ± 0.47 |
Results are expressed as mean percentage of total FA ± S.E.M. Results derived from n = 6 for dams and n = 24 for pups.
Figure 1Correlation between the FA composition of milk and that of dams’ and pups’ plasma. The Spearman correlation coefficient is represented in the heat map following the color in the legend. Correlations with statistical significance (p < 0.05) are shown in a bold frame. Results derived from n = 6 for milk and dams’ plasma and n = 24 for pups’ plasma.
Figure 2Correlations between dams’ and pups’ FA plasma content. The Spearman correlation coefficient is represented in the heat map following the color in the legends. Correlations with statistical significance (p < 0.05) are shown in a bold frame. Results derived from n = 6 for milk and dams’ plasma and n = 24 for pups’ plasma.
Analysis of absolute and relative Ig concentration in milk and plasma of dams and pups.
| Dams’ plasma | Milk | Pups’ Plasma | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| µg/mL | % | µg/mL | % | µg/mL | % | |
|
| 191.7 ± 36.5 | 4.8 ± 1.0 | 9.5 ± 2.0 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 18.8 ± 0.6 | 0.5 ± 0.0 |
|
| 4139.7 ± 969.6 | 92.94 ± 1.1 | 589.1 ± 120.4 | 88.5 ± 1.6 | 4207.3 ± 400.7 | 97.9 ± 0.1 |
|
| 93.7 ± 9.7 | 2.37 ± 0.3 | 9.6 ± 1.0 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 125.3 ± 6.2 | 3.1 ± 0.2 |
|
| 576.5 ± 66.3 | 14.89 ± 2.3 | 70.1 ± 7.3 | 12.0 ± 1.8 | 682.3 ± 35.5 | 17.2 ± 1.3 |
|
| 2425.3 ± 779.5 | 50.56 ± 5.6 | 362.6 ± 102.5 | 50.0 ± 6.7 | 2534.4 ± 372.0 | 55.5 ± 3.4 |
|
| 1044.1 ± 199.8 | 25.12 ± 4.4 | 146.8 ± 24.0 | 24.9 ± 5.3 | 865.3 ± 88.3 | 22.1 ± 3.0 |
|
| 5.1 ± 1.0 | 5.06 ± 1.0 | 6.3 ± 1.2 | 6.3 ± 1.2 | 4.2 ± 0.4 | 4.2 ± 0.4 |
|
| 90.1 ± 9.8 | 2.26 ± 0.2 | 57.4 ± 6.6 | 10.0 ± 1.6 | 65.7 ± 2.9 | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
Results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M and relative percentage. a Th1/Th2 ratio refers to the relationship between IgG2b + IgG2c and IgG1 + IgG2a, respectively. Results derived from n = 6 for dams and n = 16 for pups.
Figure 3Correlation between the Ig composition of milk, dams’ plasma, and pups’ plasma. (a) Correlation between milk and dams’ and pups’ plasma and (b) correlation between dams’ and pups’ plasma. The Spearman correlation coefficient is represented in the heat map following the color in the legend. Correlations with statistical significance (p < 0.05) are shown in a bold frame. Results derived from n = 6 for milk and dams’ plasma and n = 16 for pups’ plasma.
Figure 4Assessment of microbiota composition of milk (n = 6) and CC (n = 3). The sequencing of the amplicon targeting the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA was performed following the 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Illumina 15044223 B protocol. The main taxonomic ranks abundances, corresponding to (a) phylum, (b) family, and (c) genera are represented in stacked bars. The qualitative assessment of microbiota was represented (d) in a Venn Diagram at the level of genera. Finally, the natural clustering of samples was assessed (e) by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) at the level of genera. Results derived from n = 5 for milk and n = 3 for both dams’ and pups’ CC. Cecal content (CC).
Figure 5Correlation between the FA composition and Ig present in milk. The Spearman correlation coefficient is represented in the heat map following the color in the legend. Correlations with statistical significance (p < 0.05) are shown in a bold frame. Results derived from n = 6 for both milk and dams’ plasma.
Figure 6Correlation between the milk microbiota composition and the content of FA and Ig present in milk. The Spearman correlation coefficient is represented in the heat map following the color in the legend. Correlations with statistical significance (p < 0.05) are shown in a bold frame. Results derived from n = 5.