Literature DB >> 31991401

Epigenetic chaperoning of aging.

Stefanie Müthel1,2, Baris Tursun1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; epigenetic; healthspan; histone chaperone; metabolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31991401      PMCID: PMC7053630          DOI: 10.18632/aging.102808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)        ISSN: 1945-4589            Impact factor:   5.682


× No keyword cloud information.
Who wants to live forever? Lifespan extension is a long-standing human desire. And sure enough, a longer lifespan is expected to also extend the time without diseases and frailty. But should we take for granted that lifespan and healthspan are inherently linked? Meaning, does increased lifespan also extend the time without unfavorable health conditions? It is not well understood to which extend lifespan and healthspan are indeed linked. Recent studies provide increasing evidence that epigenetic factors may play a pivotal role in connecting aging and healthspan regulation. Epigenetic factors control gene expression by regulating modifications and structure of chromatin. Loss of specific chromatin regulators can cause defects and diseases such as cancer and neurodegeneration. Also, histone demethylases maintain muscle stem cells and Sirtuins with histone deacetylation activity control organismal aging [1]. Another type of chromatin-regulating proteins are histone chaperones. They are required for nuclear import of histone proteins, their assembly into nucleosomes and genomic localization, as well as for the post-translational modifications of histones. Histone chaperones interact with different chromatin-regulating factors to provide gene regulatory functions with a broad spectrum of physiological functions such as cell fate safeguarding and blocking reprogramming of cell identities [2]. Recently, it was found that the histone chaperone LIN-53 in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans), known as RBBP4 and RBBP7 in humans, is important for lifespan as well as healthspan regulation [3]. Interestingly, a previous study in humans revealed that RBBP4/7 are implicated in aging and age-related memory loss [4,5]. Therefore, it is conceivable that LIN-53 represents and evolutionarily conserved link of lifespan and healthspan regulation. The histone chaperone LIN-53 and its mammalian homologs RBBP4/7 (older names: CAF-1p48, RbAp46/48) are found in different chromatin-regulating complexes including Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2, histone methyltransferase activity), CAF1 histone chaperone complex, Sin3 histone deacetylase complex (HDAC), nucleosome remodeling complex (NuRD), and DRM (Dp/Rb/Muv) complex [6]. Recently, LIN-53 and the RBBP4/7-containing CAF1 complex have been identified as reprogramming barriers in the nematode C. elegans and in mouse fibroblasts, respectively. Additionally, LIN-53 and its homologs play important roles during cell cycle regulation in C. elegans, Drosophila, and mammals [7] pointing to an evolutionarily conserved repertoire of different physiological functions. LIN-53 links lifespan and healthspan. Loss of LIN-53 in C. elegans leads to a severe decrease in muscle function and a shortened lifespan [3]. Motility defects due to deteriorated muscle structure of lin-53 mutant animals are apparent in developing and aging animals. Genetic and biochemical analysis revealed that LIN-53’s role in maintaining muscle health functions through the chromatin-remodeling complex NuRD. Interestingly, loss of other NuRD component cause muscle defects without affecting lifespan, indicating that LIN-53 depletion causes two separable phenotypes: a short lifespan and a short healthspan. Indeed, LIN-53’s role in regulating aging could be attributed to its function through the HDAC complex Sin3, which causes a shortened lifespan also in Drosophila when depleted [3]. Analogously to the NuRD conundrum, depletion of Sin3 decreases lifespan but animals do not show obvious muscle health defects during aging [3]. Multi-layered omics analysis revealed that loss of either LIN-53 or Sin3 leads to changes in the expression of genes regulating metabolic pathways, and that LIN-53 binds directly to these genes [3]. Metabolomics of lin-53 and sin-3 mutants pointed to a marked decrease of trehalose levels - a disaccharide required for normal lifespan in worms [8]. Reduced trehalose levels are caused by impaired expression of genes required for trehalose synthesis. They are directly regulated by DAF-16 - a FOXO transcription factor which regulates aging and acts downstream of the insulin/IGF-pathway [8]. In LIN-53-depleted animals DAF-16 translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus is diminished, thereby causing insufficient gene expression for trehalose synthesis. Notably, increasing trehalose levels of lin-53 mutants by trehalose feeding rescued the short lifespan but not the muscle defects [3], which corroborates the notion that regulation of aging and healthspan can be separated. Overall, LIN-53 epigenetically combines healthspan maintenance through the NuRD complex with aging regulation via the HDAC Sin3. Such epigenetic link may have been conserved in evolution. The human LIN-53 homologs RBBP4 and RBBP7 are implicated in the early childhood aging disease Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS) [4]. HGPS patients carry a mutation in the lamin A/C gene encoding for the nuclear envelope protein lamin. Patient cells show low RBBP4/7 protein levels and loss of RBBP4/7 association with the nuclear lamina causes chromatin mis-regulation. HGPS belongs to laminopathy disorders, which also include Emery–Dreifuss muscular dystrophy (EDMD). EDMD patients suffer from diminished muscle maintenance and it is possible that RBBP4/7 are generally affected in such laminopathies, which would recapitulate the short lifespan and muscle phenotypes in worms (Figure 1). Overall, LIN‐53 and RBBP4/7 may epigenetically connect lifespan and healthspan maintenance in C. elegans as well as humans. This notion is also supported by a recent study revealing that the decline of RBBP4 in humans causes cognitive aging and memory loss [5]. It is therefore conceivable that LIN‐53 and its homologs represent an evolutionarily conserved link of lifespan and healthspan regulation across species.
Figure 1

Physiological functions of the histone chaperone homologs LIN-53 and RBBP4/7 with respect to cellular safeguarding, muscular healthspan, and aging. In C. elegans the histone chaperone LIN-53 functions through the histone deacetylase complex Sin3 to ensure normal lifespan, while its function via the chromatin remodelling complex NuRD is required for muscle maintenance during aging. RBBP4/7 are the human homologs of LIN-53 and act through NuRD to prevent premature aging as seen in patients with the laminopathy disease Progeria. It remains to be determined whether RBBP4/7 are also required for muscle healthspan to prevent muscle decay in laminopathies with known muscle phenotypes. LIN-53 and its homologs safeguard cell fates by acting as reprogramming barriers via the PRC2 complex in C. elegans and CAF1 complex in mouse fibroblasts.

Physiological functions of the histone chaperone homologs LIN-53 and RBBP4/7 with respect to cellular safeguarding, muscular healthspan, and aging. In C. elegans the histone chaperone LIN-53 functions through the histone deacetylase complex Sin3 to ensure normal lifespan, while its function via the chromatin remodelling complex NuRD is required for muscle maintenance during aging. RBBP4/7 are the human homologs of LIN-53 and act through NuRD to prevent premature aging as seen in patients with the laminopathy disease Progeria. It remains to be determined whether RBBP4/7 are also required for muscle healthspan to prevent muscle decay in laminopathies with known muscle phenotypes. LIN-53 and its homologs safeguard cell fates by acting as reprogramming barriers via the PRC2 complex in C. elegans and CAF1 complex in mouse fibroblasts. In the future further studies to elucidate the molecular links of lifespan and healthspan regulation based on epigenetics and metabolism will be required to better understand the relevant aspects of aging. But: Who waits forever anyway?
  8 in total

Review 1.  Cell cycle transcription control: DREAM/MuvB and RB-E2F complexes.

Authors:  Martin Fischer; Gerd A Müller
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 8.250

2.  Increasing Notch signaling antagonizes PRC2-mediated silencing to promote reprograming of germ cells into neurons.

Authors:  Stefanie Seelk; Irene Adrian-Kalchhauser; Balázs Hargitai; Martina Hajduskova; Silvia Gutnik; Baris Tursun; Rafal Ciosk
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Metabolic shift from glycogen to trehalose promotes lifespan and healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Yonghak Seo; Samuel Kingsley; Griffin Walker; Michelle A Mondoux; Heidi A Tissenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Interaction between epigenetic and metabolism in aging stem cells.

Authors:  Anne Brunet; Thomas A Rando
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 8.382

5.  Molecular mechanism for age-related memory loss: the histone-binding protein RbAp48.

Authors:  Elias Pavlopoulos; Sidonie Jones; Stylianos Kosmidis; Maggie Close; Carla Kim; Olga Kovalerchik; Scott A Small; Eric R Kandel
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  The conserved histone chaperone LIN-53 is required for normal lifespan and maintenance of muscle integrity in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Stefanie Müthel; Bora Uyar; Mei He; Anne Krause; Burcu Vitrinel; Selman Bulut; Djordje Vasiljevic; Iris Marchal; Stefan Kempa; Altuna Akalin; Baris Tursun
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 9.304

7.  Ageing-related chromatin defects through loss of the NURD complex.

Authors:  Gianluca Pegoraro; Nard Kubben; Ute Wickert; Heike Göhler; Katrin Hoffmann; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-09-06       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  FACT Sets a Barrier for Cell Fate Reprogramming in Caenorhabditis elegans and Human Cells.

Authors:  Ena Kolundzic; Andreas Ofenbauer; Selman I Bulut; Bora Uyar; Gülkiz Baytek; Anne Sommermeier; Stefanie Seelk; Mei He; Antje Hirsekorn; Dubravka Vucicevic; Altuna Akalin; Sebastian Diecke; Scott A Lacadie; Baris Tursun
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 12.270

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.