Literature DB >> 3199135

Retention of the posterior cruciate in total knee arthroplasty.

T P Andriacchi1, J O Galante.   

Abstract

Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty is discussed in biomechanical and clinical terms and the implications for design, kinematics, function, and prosthesis longevity considered. The specific roles of passive range of motion, femoral rollback, stresses on the implant-bone-prosthesis cement system, and wear are examined. The authors argue that the posterior cruciate ligament improves passive range of motion, the mechanical efficiency of the knee musculature and thus improved stairclimbing efficiency, reduces stress at the cement-bone-implant interfaces, and has little or no impact on the polyethylene wear problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3199135     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(88)80003-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  15 in total

1.  Posterior cruciate ligament function following total knee arthroplasty: the effect of joint line elevation.

Authors:  G J Emodi; J J Callaghan; D R Pedersen; T D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1999

2.  Influence of bi- and tri-compartmental knee arthroplasty on the kinematics of the knee joint.

Authors:  Markus Wünschel; Jiahsuan Lo; Torsten Dilger; Nikolaus Wülker; Otto Müller
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Total knee arthroplasty following failed high tibial osteotomy: mid-term comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized prosthesis.

Authors:  Yukio Akasaki; Shuichi Matsuda; Hiromasa Miura; Ken Okazaki; Taka-aki Moro-oka; Hideki Mizu-uchi; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparison of total knee arthroplasty with highly congruent anterior-stabilized bearings versus a cruciate-retaining design.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Patrick Mulkey; Jill Erickson; Michael B Anderson; Christopher E Pelt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Does cruciate retention primary total knee arthroplasty affect proprioception, strength and clinical outcome?

Authors:  Pieter-Jan T K Vandekerckhove; Roel Parys; Thomas Tampere; Patrick Linden; Luc Van den Daelen; Peter C Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Functional evaluation in cruciate-retaining-type TKA: anatomical relationship between tibial osteotomy level and PCL attachment.

Authors:  Masaya Aoki; Takaaki Shishido; Yasuhito Takahashi; Yoichi Katori; Kosuke Kubo; Taichiro Takamatsu; Kengo Yamamoto
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-01-20

7.  Retained versus resected posterior cruciate ligament in mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a retrospective, clinical and functional assessment.

Authors:  D Enea; V Cigna; C Sgolacchia; L Tozzi; A Verdenelli; A Gigante
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2015-01-09

8.  Preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament is not helpful in highly conforming mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Yoon Whan Roh; Jak Jang; Won Chul Choi; Joon Kyu Lee; Sae Hyung Chun; Sahnghoon Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Long-term Results of Hybrid Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum 10-years Follow-up.

Authors:  Young Joon Choi; Ki Won Lee; Chung Hwan Kim; Hyung Sun Ahn; Jae Kwang Hwang; Jeong Ho Kang; Hee Don Han; Wan Jong Cho; Jun Seok Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2012-05-31

10.  Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Lennard G H van den Boom; Reinoud W Brouwer; Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Jos J A M van Raaij
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.