Literature DB >> 31991288

CRISPR/CAS9-based DNA damage response screens reveal gene-drug interactions.

Dan Su1, Xu Feng1, Medina Colic2, Yunfei Wang3, Chunchao Zhang1, Chao Wang1, Mengfan Tang1, Traver Hart2, Junjie Chen4.   

Abstract

DNA damage response (DDR) is critically important for cell survival, genome maintenance, and its defect has been exploited therapeutically in cancer treatment. Many DDR-targeting agents have been generated and have entered the clinic and/or clinical trials. In order to provide a global and unbiased view of DDR network, we designed a focused CRISPR library targeting 365 DDR genes and performed CRISPR screens on the responses to several DDR inhibitors and DNA-damaging agents in 293A cells. With these screens, we determined responsive pathways enriched under treatment with different types of small-molecule agents. Additionally, we showed that POLE3/4-deficient cells displayed enhanced sensitivity to an ATR inhibitor, a PARP inhibitor, and camptothecin. Moreover, by performing DDR screens in isogenic TP53 wild-type and TP53 knock-out cell lines, our results suggest that the performance of our CRISPR DDR dropout screens is independent of TP53 status. Collectively, our findings indicate that CRISPR DDR screens can be used to identify potential targets of small-molecule drugs and reveal that TP53 status does not affect the outcome of these screens. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR screen; DNA damage response; TP53

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31991288      PMCID: PMC7034363          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  36 in total

1.  Cancer. Potential of the synthetic lethality principle.

Authors:  Sebastian M B Nijman; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells.

Authors:  S M Elbashir; J Harborth; W Lendeckel; A Yalcin; K Weber; T Tuschl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Off-target toxicity is a common mechanism of action of cancer drugs undergoing clinical trials.

Authors:  Ann Lin; Christopher J Giuliano; Ann Palladino; Kristen M John; Connor Abramowicz; Monet Lou Yuan; Erin L Sausville; Devon A Lukow; Luwei Liu; Alexander R Chait; Zachary C Galluzzo; Clara Tucker; Jason M Sheltzer
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Viral Packaging and Cell Culture for CRISPR-Based Screens.

Authors:  Tim Wang; Eric S Lander; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2016-03-01

Review 5.  Therapeutic opportunities within the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Laurence H Pearl; Amanda C Schierz; Simon E Ward; Bissan Al-Lazikani; Frances M G Pearl
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens.

Authors:  Wei Li; Han Xu; Tengfei Xiao; Le Cong; Michael I Love; Feng Zhang; Rafael A Irizarry; Jun S Liu; Myles Brown; X Shirley Liu
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  POLE3-POLE4 Is a Histone H3-H4 Chaperone that Maintains Chromatin Integrity during DNA Replication.

Authors:  Roberto Bellelli; Ondrej Belan; Valerie E Pye; Camille Clement; Sarah L Maslen; J Mark Skehel; Peter Cherepanov; Genevieve Almouzni; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Genome-wide CRISPR screens reveal synthetic lethality of RNASEH2 deficiency and ATR inhibition.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Gang Wang; Xu Feng; Peter Shepherd; Jie Zhang; Mengfan Tang; Zhen Chen; Mrinal Srivastava; Megan E McLaughlin; Nora M Navone; Glen Traver Hart; Junjie Chen
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  WebGestalt 2019: gene set analysis toolkit with revamped UIs and APIs.

Authors:  Yuxing Liao; Jing Wang; Eric J Jaehnig; Zhiao Shi; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  CRISPR screens are feasible in TP53 wild-type cells.

Authors:  Kevin R Brown; Barbara Mair; Martin Soste; Jason Moffat
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  5 in total

1.  CellCountCV-A Web-Application for Accurate Cell Counting and Automated Batch Processing of Microscopic Images Using Fully Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Denis Antonets; Nikolai Russkikh; Antoine Sanchez; Victoria Kovalenko; Elvira Bairamova; Dmitry Shtokalo; Sergey Medvedev; Suren Zakian
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 2.  Common computational tools for analyzing CRISPR screens.

Authors:  Medina Colic; Traver Hart
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2021-12-21

Review 3.  Targeting DNA repair pathway in cancer: Mechanisms and clinical application.

Authors:  Manni Wang; Siyuan Chen; Danyi Ao
Journal:  MedComm (2020)       Date:  2021-12-07

Review 4.  The emerging role of ISWI chromatin remodeling complexes in cancer.

Authors:  Yanan Li; Han Gong; Pan Wang; Yu Zhu; Hongling Peng; Yajuan Cui; Heng Li; Jing Liu; Zi Wang
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11-04

5.  EPIKOL, a chromatin-focused CRISPR/Cas9-based screening platform, to identify cancer-specific epigenetic vulnerabilities.

Authors:  Ozlem Yedier-Bayram; Bengul Gokbayrak; Alisan Kayabolen; Ali Cenk Aksu; Ayse Derya Cavga; Ahmet Cingöz; Ezgi Yagmur Kala; Goktug Karabiyik; Rauf Günsay; Beril Esin; Tunc Morova; Fırat Uyulur; Hamzah Syed; Martin Philpott; Adam P Cribbs; Sonia H Y Kung; Nathan A Lack; Tamer T Onder; Tugba Bagci-Onder
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 9.685

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.