Literature DB >> 31991031

Using machine learning to construct nomograms for patients with metastatic colon cancer.

B Zhao1, R A Gabriel2, F Vaida3, S Eisenstein1, G T Schnickel1, J K Sicklick1, B M Clary1.   

Abstract

AIM: Patients with synchronous colon cancer metastases have highly variable overall survival (OS), making accurate predictive models challenging to build. We aim to use machine learning to more accurately predict OS in these patients and to present this predictive model in the form of nomograms for patients and clinicians.
METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (2010-2014), we identified right colon (RC) and left colon (LC) cancer patients with synchronous metastases. Each primary site was split into training and testing datasets. Nomograms predicting 3- year OS were created for each site using Cox proportional hazard regression with lasso regression. Each model was evaluated by both calibration (comparison of predicted vs observed OS) and validation (degree of concordance as measured by the c-index) methodologies.
RESULTS: A total of 11 018 RC and 8346 LC patients were used to construct and validate the nomograms. After stratifying each model into five risk groups, the predicted OS was within the 95% CI of the observed OS in four out of five risk groups for both the RC and LC models. Externally validated c-indexes at 3 years for the RC and LC models were 0.794 and 0.761, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of machine learning can result in more accurate predictive models for patients with metastatic colon cancer. Nomograms built from these models can assist clinicians and patients in the shared decision-making process of their cancer care. Colorectal Disease
© 2020 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NCDB; colon cancer; machine learning; metastasis; nomogram

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31991031      PMCID: PMC8722819          DOI: 10.1111/codi.14991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  37 in total

1.  Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.

Authors:  Kenneth L Kehl; Mary Beth Landrum; Neeraj K Arora; Patricia A Ganz; Michelle van Ryn; Jennifer W Mack; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 2.  Right Versus Left Colon Cancer Biology: Integrating the Consensus Molecular Subtypes.

Authors:  Michael S Lee; David G Menter; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  A clinical nomogram for predicting long-term survival in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C Massacesi; A Norman; T Price; M Hill; P Ross; D Cunningham
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  The prognostic implications of primary colorectal tumor location on recurrence and overall survival in patients undergoing resection for colorectal liver metastasis.

Authors:  Kazunari Sasaki; Nikolaos Andreatos; Georgios A Margonis; Jin He; Matthew Weiss; Fabian Johnston; Christopher Wolfgang; Efstathios Antoniou; Emmanouil Pikoulis; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases.

Authors:  Timothy M Pawlik; Charles R Scoggins; Daria Zorzi; Eddie K Abdalla; Axel Andres; Cathy Eng; Steven A Curley; Evelyne M Loyer; Andrea Muratore; Gilles Mentha; Lorenzo Capussotti; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Brain Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Survival and Analysis of Prognostic Factors.

Authors:  Marlies Michl; Johannes Thurmaier; Gabriele Schubert-Fritschle; Max Wiedemann; Rüdiger P Laubender; Natascha C Nüssler; Reinhard Ruppert; Jörg Kleeff; Wolfgang Schepp; Clemens Reuter; Florian Löhe; Meinolf Karthaus; Jens Neumann; Thomas Kirchner; Jutta Engel; Volker Heinemann
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.481

7.  Multicenter randomized trial of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid compared with surgery alone after resection of colorectal liver metastases: FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 trial.

Authors:  Guillaume Portier; Dominique Elias; Olivier Bouche; Philippe Rougier; Jean-François Bosset; Jean Saric; Jacques Belghiti; Pascal Piedbois; Rosine Guimbaud; Bernard Nordlinger; Roland Bugat; Franck Lazorthes; Laurent Bedenne
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Prognostic models for predicting death after hepatectomy in individuals with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yukihide Kanemitsu; Tomoyuki Kato
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  A new scoring system to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases: proposal of criteria to select candidates for hepatic resection.

Authors:  Ikuo Nagashima; Tadahiro Takada; Keiji Matsuda; Miki Adachi; Hirokazu Nagawa; Tetsuichiro Muto; Kota Okinaga
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2004

10.  Colorectal cancer liver metastases - a population-based study on incidence, management and survival.

Authors:  Jennie Engstrand; Henrik Nilsson; Cecilia Strömberg; Eduard Jonas; Jacob Freedman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Takashi Sakamoto; Tadahiro Goto; Michimasa Fujiogi; Alan Kawarai Lefor
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.549

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.