Literature DB >> 31990433

Autosomal suppression and fitness costs of an old driving X chromosome in Drosophila testacea.

Graeme L Keais1,2, Sijia Lu1, Steve J Perlman1.   

Abstract

Driving X chromosomes (XD s) bias their own transmission through males by killing Y-bearing gametes. These chromosomes can in theory spread rapidly in populations and cause extinction, but many are found as balanced polymorphisms or as "cryptic" XD s shut down by drive suppressors. The relative likelihood of these outcomes and the evolutionary pathways through which they come about are not well understood. An XD was recently discovered in the mycophagous fly, Drosophila testacea, presenting the opportunity to compare this XD with the well-studied XD of its sister species, Drosophila neotestacea. Comparing features of independently evolved XD s in young sister species is a promising avenue towards understanding how XD s and their counteracting forces change over time. In contrast to the XD of D. neotestacea, we find that the XD of D. testacea is old, with its origin predating the radiation of three species: D. testacea, D. neotestacea and their shared sister species, Drosophila orientacea. Motivated by the suggestion that older XD s should be more deleterious to carriers, we assessed the effect of the XD on both male and female fertility. Unlike what is known from D. neotestacea, we found a strong fitness cost in females homozygous for the XD in D. testacea: a large proportion of homozygous females failed to produce offspring after being housed with males for several days. Our male fertility experiments show that although XD male fertility is lower under sperm-depleting conditions, XD males have comparable fertility to males carrying a standard X chromosome under a free-mating regime, which may better approximate conditions in wild populations of D. testacea. Lastly, we demonstrate the presence of autosomal suppression of X chromosome drive. Our results provide support for a model of XD evolution where the dynamics of young XD s are governed by fitness consequences in males, whereas in older XD systems, both suppression and fitness consequences in females likely supersede male fitness costs.
© 2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Drosophilazzm321990; X chromosome; gamete-killing; gene drive; genetic conflict; genomic conflict; meiotic drive; segregation distortion; selfish genetic elements; sex ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31990433     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  3 in total

1.  X-linked meiotic drive can boost population size and persistence.

Authors:  Carl Mackintosh; Andrew Pomiankowski; Michael F Scott
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The fate of a suppressed X-linked meiotic driver: experimental evolution in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Héloïse Bastide; David Ogereau; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau; Pierre R Gérard
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.620

Review 3.  Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.

Authors:  Tom A R Price; Nikolai Windbichler; Robert L Unckless; Andreas Sutter; Jan-Niklas Runge; Perran A Ross; Andrew Pomiankowski; Nicole L Nuckolls; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau; Nicole Mideo; Oliver Y Martin; Andri Manser; Mathieu Legros; Amanda M Larracuente; Luke Holman; John Godwin; Neil Gemmell; Cécile Courret; Anna Buchman; Luke G Barrett; Anna K Lindholm
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.