Literature DB >> 31989772

Informing management decisions for ecological networks, using dynamic models calibrated to noisy time-series data.

Matthew P Adams1,2,3, Scott A Sisson4, Kate J Helmstedt5,6, Christopher M Baker2,5,7,8,9, Matthew H Holden2,7,9,10, Michaela Plein1,2,11, Jacinta Holloway5,6, Kerrie L Mengersen5,6, Eve McDonald-Madden1,2,9.   

Abstract

Well-intentioned environmental management can backfire, causing unforeseen damage. To avoid this, managers and ecologists seek accurate predictions of the ecosystem-wide impacts of interventions, given small and imprecise datasets, which is an incredibly difficult task. We generated and analysed thousands of ecosystem population time series to investigate whether fitted models can aid decision-makers to select interventions. Using these time-series data (sparse and noisy datasets drawn from deterministic Lotka-Volterra systems with two to nine species, of known network structure), dynamic model forecasts of whether a species' future population will be positively or negatively affected by rapid eradication of another species were correct > 70% of the time. Although 70% correct classifications is only slightly better than an uninformative prediction (50%), this classification accuracy can be feasibly improved by increasing monitoring accuracy and frequency. Our findings suggest that models may not need to produce well-constrained predictions before they can inform decisions that improve environmental outcomes.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Keywords:  Conservation; decision science; ecological forecasting; ecological modelling; food webs; interaction network; population dynamics; predator-prey interactions; prediction; uncertainty propagation

Year:  2020        PMID: 31989772     DOI: 10.1111/ele.13465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  5 in total

Review 1.  Refocusing multiple stressor research around the targets and scales of ecological impacts.

Authors:  Benno I Simmons; Penelope S A Blyth; Julia L Blanchard; Tom Clegg; Eva Delmas; Aurélie Garnier; Christopher A Griffiths; Ute Jacob; Frank Pennekamp; Owen L Petchey; Timothée Poisot; Thomas J Webb; Andrew P Beckerman
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 2.  Evaluating unintended consequences of intentional species introductions and eradications for improved conservation management.

Authors:  Dean E Pearson; Tyler J Clark; Philip G Hahn
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 7.563

3.  Ten simple rules for tackling your first mathematical models: A guide for graduate students by graduate students.

Authors:  Korryn Bodner; Chris Brimacombe; Emily S Chenery; Ariel Greiner; Anne M McLeod; Stephanie R Penk; Juan S Vargas Soto
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Interactive effects of multiple stressors vary with consumer interactions, stressor dynamics and magnitude.

Authors:  Mischa P Turschwell; Sean R Connolly; Ralf B Schäfer; Frederik De Laender; Max D Campbell; Chrystal Mantyka-Pringle; Michelle C Jackson; Mira Kattwinkel; Michael Sievers; Roman Ashauer; Isabelle M Côté; Rod M Connolly; Paul J van den Brink; Christopher J Brown
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 11.274

5.  Analysis of sloppiness in model simulations: Unveiling parameter uncertainty when mathematical models are fitted to data.

Authors:  Gloria M Monsalve-Bravo; Brodie A J Lawson; Christopher Drovandi; Kevin Burrage; Kevin S Brown; Christopher M Baker; Sarah A Vollert; Kerrie Mengersen; Eve McDonald-Madden; Matthew P Adams
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 14.957

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.