Literature DB >> 31989727

Meaningful shared decision-making: complex process demanding cognitive and emotional skills.

Ruth Stalnikowicz1, Mayer Brezis2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) takes place when clinicians help patient identify best course of action in the context of their preferences.
METHODS: The aim of this paper is a narrative review of the literature with special focus on the humanistic dimensions of SDM.
RESULTS: We show that SDM is largely underused in practice, because of many barriers such as time constraints and poor skills.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that listening and empathy are key challenges in communicating uncertainty, which require emotional intelligence and trust building skills. To promote implementation, we propose the development of tools, simulation-based training and the design of improved measures for SDM quality. While essential for patients, we believe that SDM may restore meaning in healthcare.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SDM; emotional intelligence; empathy; humanism; simulation; training; uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31989727     DOI: 10.1111/jep.13349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  2 in total

Review 1.  Shared decision-making in urology and female pelvic floor medicine and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  David A Ossin; Emily C Carter; Rufus Cartwright; Philippe D Violette; Shilpa Iyer; Geraldine T Klein; Sangeeta Senapati; Zachary Klaassen; Sylvia M Botros
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  "I know my body better than you:" patient focus groups to inform a decision aid on oral corticosteroid use during pregnancy.

Authors:  Kristin Palmsten; Dani Bredesen; Meghan M JaKa; Pritika C Kumar; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Elyse O Kharbanda
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 2.890

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.