Literature DB >> 31989241

Using visual and/or kinesthetic information to stabilize intrinsic bimanual coordination patterns is a function of movement frequency.

Shaochen Huang1, Breton Van Syoc1, Ruonan Yang1,2, Taylor Kuehn1, Derek Smith1, Qin Zhu3.   

Abstract

Coordination dynamics suggest that both in-phase and anti-phase movements are intrinsic and can be readily performed without practice. As movement frequency increases, individuals performing anti-phase movement inevitably switch to perform in-phase movement. However, due to different frames of reference used to define intrinsic coordination patterns in visual and kinesthetic domains, the perception of intrinsic coordination patterns could be ambiguous, which leads to the question whether the visually or kinesthetically perceived information is used to maintain the intrinsic coordination patterns. The current study explored how the consistency between visual and kinesthetic information would impact the performance and the associated metabolic energy consumption of intrinsic bimanual coordination patterns as movement frequency increased. Thirty participants were recruited and randomly assigned to one of three groups ("Info + Spatial +", "Info + Spatial -", and "Info-Spatial +") to perform intrinsic bimanual coordination tasks using a computer-joystick system at low, high, and self-selected frequencies. The visual and kinesthetic information were manipulated to be either consistent or inconsistent by changing the spatial mapping between the motion of display and motion of joysticks. The results showed that the kinesthetic information was largely used to maintain the stability of intrinsic coordination patterns at high frequency, which could be an energy-conserving solution. However, spatial mapping alone seemed to be beneficial for keeping the visually perceived in-phase and anti-phase coordination patterns equally stable at low movement frequency, and spatially mapping the visual information to be consistent with kinesthetic information greatly enhanced the stability of anti-phase coordination. The dynamical use of visual and kinesthetic information for control of bimanual coordination is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31989241     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01288-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  30 in total

1.  The effect of frequency on the visual perception of relative phase and phase variability of two oscillating objects.

Authors:  G P Bingham; F T Zaal; J A Shull; D R Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The synchronization of human arm movements to external events.

Authors:  M J Buekers; H P Bogaerts; S P Swinnen; W F Helsen
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  When visuo-motor incongruence aids motor performance: the effect of perceiving motion structures during transformed visual feedback on bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Hedwig Bogaerts; Martinus J Buekers; Frank T Zaal; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Psychophysiological responses to changes in workload during simulated air traffic control.

Authors:  J B Brookings; G F Wilson; C R Swain
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1996-02-05       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Information about relative phase in bimanual coordination is modality specific (not amodal), but kinesthesis and vision can teach one another.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Bingham; Winona Snapp-Childs; Qin Zhu
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Heart rate and oxygen consumption during active psychological challenge: the effects of level of difficulty.

Authors:  D Carroll; J R Turner; J C Hellawell
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Heart rate and oxygen consumption during mental arithmetic, a video game, and graded static exercise.

Authors:  D Carroll; J R Turner; S Rogers
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Why change gaits? Dynamics of the walk-run transition.

Authors:  F J Diedrich; W H Warren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Neuromuscular-skeletal constraints upon the dynamics of unimanual and bimanual coordination.

Authors:  R G Carson; S Riek; C J Smethurst; J F Párraga; W D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Abstract spatial, but not body-related, visual information guides bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Janina Brandes; Farhad Rezvani; Tobias Heed
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Training 90° bimanual coordination at high frequency yields dependence on kinesthetic information and poor performance of dyadic unimanual coordination.

Authors:  Shaochen Huang; Jacob Layer; Derek Smith; Geoffrey P Bingham; Qin Zhu
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 2.397

2.  Unifying Large- and Small-Scale Theories of Coordination.

Authors:  J A Scott Kelso
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.524

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.