Literature DB >> 31989208

How much energy do we need to ablate 1 mm3 of stone during Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy? An in vitro study.

Frédéric Panthier1,2,3, Eugenio Ventimiglia1,2,4, Laurent Berthe3, Catherine Chaussain5, Michel Daudon1,6, Steeve Doizi1,2, Olivier Traxer7,8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) is currently the gold standard for lithotripsy for the treatment of all known urinary stone types. Stone composition and volume are major determinants of the lithotripsy. This in vitro study evaluated the required energy to ablate 1 mm3 of various stone types with different laser settings using Ho:YAG.
METHODS: 272 µm core-diameter laser fibers (Boston Scientific©) were connected to a 30 Watt MH1 Ho:YAG generator (Rocamed®). An experimental setup consisting of immerged human stones of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM), uric acid (UA) or cystine (Cys) was used with a single pulse lasing emission (0.6/0.8/1 J), in contact mode. Stones were dried out before three-dimensional scanning to measure ablation volume per pulse (AVP) and required energy to treat 1 mm3 (RE).
RESULTS: All settings considered, ablation volumes per pulse (AVP) for COM were significantly lower than those for UA and Cys (p = 0.002 and p = 0.03, respectively), whereas AVP for Cys was significantly lower than those for UA (p = 0.03). The mean REs at 0.6 J pulse energy (PE) for COM, Cys and UA were 34, 8.5 and 3.2 J, respectively The mean REs at 1 J PE for COM, Cys and UA were 14.7, 6.4 and 2 J, respectively. At 0.6 J PE, RE for COM was more than tenfold and fivefold higher than those for UA and Cys, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This in vitro study shows for the first time a volumetric evaluation of Ho:YAG efficiency by the ablation volume per pulse on human stone samples, according to various pulse energies. The REs for COM, UA and Cys should be considered in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Holmium YAG; Laser; Lithotripsy; Volume

Year:  2020        PMID: 31989208     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03091-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Analysis and classification of calculi: contribution to the etiology of calculous disease].

Authors:  Michel Daudon
Journal:  Rev Med Suisse Romande       Date:  2004-08

2.  Is Very High Power/Frequency Really Necessary During Laser Lithotripsy? RE: Understanding the Popcorn Effect During Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Dusting (Aldoukhi et al, Urology. 2018 Dec;122:52-57).

Authors:  Eugenio Ventimiglia; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Effect of Stone Composition on the Outcomes of Semi-Rigid Ureteroscopy Using Holmium: Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser or Pneumatic Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mustafa Kadihasanoglu; Ugur Yucetas; Mehmet Gokhan Culha; Erkan Erkan; Mahmut Gokhan Toktas
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 0.711

4.  Automatic segmentation of medical images for renal calculi and analysis.

Authors:  S Sridhar; N Kumaravel
Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum       Date:  2001

5.  En bloc greenlight laser enucleation of prostate (GreenLEP): about the first hundred cases.

Authors:  Frédéric Panthier; Jennifer Pasquier; Sébastien Bruel; Vidal Azancot; Alexandre De La Taille; Daniel Gasman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Role of low- versus high-power laser in the treatment of lower pole stones: prospective non-randomized outcomes from a university teaching hospital.

Authors:  Amelia Pietropaolo; Mriganka Mani; Thomas Hughes; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-05-26

Review 2.  A Practical Guide for Intra-Renal Temperature and Pressure Management during Rirs: What Is the Evidence Telling Us.

Authors:  Felipe Pauchard; Eugenio Ventimiglia; Mariela Corrales; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Cavitation Plays a Vital Role in Stone Dusting During Short Pulse Holmium:YAG Laser Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Junqin Chen; Derek S Ho; Gaoming Xiang; Georgy Sankin; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.619

4.  Evaluation of a free 3D software for kidney stones' surgical planning: "kidney stone calculator" a pilot study.

Authors:  Frédéric Panthier; Olivier Traxer; Laurent Yonneau; Thierry Lebret; Laurent Berthe; Lounès Illoul; Marc-Olivier Timsit; Arnaud Mejean; Steeve Doizi; François Audenet
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Laser Fiber Displacement Velocity during Tm-Fiber and Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy: Introducing the Concept of Optimal Displacement Velocity.

Authors:  Frederic Panthier; Thibault Germain; Cyril Gorny; Laurent Berthe; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.