Literature DB >> 28492152

Effect of Stone Composition on the Outcomes of Semi-Rigid Ureteroscopy Using Holmium: Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser or Pneumatic Lithotripsy.

Mustafa Kadihasanoglu1, Ugur Yucetas1, Mehmet Gokhan Culha1, Erkan Erkan1, Mahmut Gokhan Toktas1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of laser lithotripsy (LL) and pneumatic lithotripters (PL) in calcium oxalate (CaOx) and calcium phosphate (CaP) stones and assess whether these stone compositions affect the outcomes of LL and PL. STUDY
DESIGN: Comparative, descriptive study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, from August 2010 to August 2015.
METHODOLOGY: A total of 114 patients underwent ureteroscopy using LL and PL. Fifty-eight (50.9%) had CaOx stones and 56 (49.1%) had CaP stones. The lithotripters were compared in stone composition groups, and stone compositions were compared in lithotripter groups. Patient characteristics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative complications were compared.
RESULTS: The baseline patient and stone characteristics were similar in all groups. The operation time of the PL and LL for the patients with CaP stones (68.75 ±32.88 and 44.48 ±34.37 minutes, respectively) was significantly shorter than the operation time of the PL and LL for the patients with CaOx stones (91.56 ±30.54 and 65.75 ±37.74 minutes, (p=0.012 and p=0.009, respectively). Moreover, the patients with CaOx or CaP treated with LL 65.75±37.74 and 44.48 ±34.37 minutes, respectively) had significant shorter operation time than the PL (91.56 ±30.54 and 68.75 ±32.88 minutes, (p=0.046 and p=0.01, respectively). Stone-free rates were similar in all groups. The PL for the patients with CaP stones caused more postoperative fever and infection than the other groups (p=0.050).
CONCLUSION: Though both PL and LL are effective in the treatment of CaOx and CaP stones, LL had a significantly shorter operation and hospitalization time and complication rates in patients with CaOx and CaP stones. So LL is a more feasible and safer modality in the treatment of recurrent CaP stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28492152     DOI: 2595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak        ISSN: 1022-386X            Impact factor:   0.711


  3 in total

1.  How much energy do we need to ablate 1 mm3 of stone during Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy? An in vitro study.

Authors:  Frédéric Panthier; Eugenio Ventimiglia; Laurent Berthe; Catherine Chaussain; Michel Daudon; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Comparison of mean operative time in patients undergoing Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy in ureterorenoscopy for ureteric calculus.

Authors:  Muhammad Tanveer Sajid; Mohammad Ameen; Badar Murtaza; Muhammad Sarwar Alvi; Zakir Khan; Faran Kiani
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

3.  The Effects of Scanning Speed and Standoff Distance of the Fiber on Dusting Efficiency during Short Pulse Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Junqin Chen; Daiwei Li; Wenjun Yu; Zhiteng Ma; Chenhang Li; Gaoming Xiang; Yuan Wu; Junjie Yao; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.