Literature DB >> 31989105

Periodontal evaluation using a non-invasive imaging method (ultrasonography).

Radu Chifor1, Alexandru Florin Badea2, Ioana Chifor1, Delia-Alexandrina Mitrea3, Maria Crisan4, Mindra Eugenia Badea1.   

Abstract

The periodontal disease and gingival bleeding are highly prevalent in the adult population worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) data shows that 90-100% of the 34-year-old adults present gingival inflammation. Therefore, an investigation method is required to allow the assessment of the periodontal disease as well as the monitoring of the evolution of the gingival inflammation after periodontal treatments. Non-invasive and operator-independent methods for periodontal examination are necessary for diagnosing and monitoring the periodontal disease. The periodontal ultrasonography is a reliable technique for visualizing the anatomical elements which are necessary to diagnose the periodontal status. Using this imaging technique the dentino-enamel junction, the cortical bone, the radicular surface from the crown to the alveolar bone, the gingival tissue can be seen without interfering with those elements during the examination. Also, calculus visualization is possible before and after scaling in order to evaluate the quality of the treatment. Using 2D ultrasonography is not feasible in dental practice as it requires extensive experience and is also time consuming. The reproducibility of the 2D slices is very difficult in order to have the possibility to compare different investigations efficiently. 3D reconstructions of the periodontal tissue can be a very good alternative to eliminate the operator dependence. Ultrasonography allows the practitioner to visualize the anatomic elements involved in making a periodontal diagnosis. It also allows tracking of subsequent changes. This method is not commonly used for periodontal examination and further studies are required. Previous studies show that ultrasonography can be a reliable non-invasive method to diagnose and monitor the periodontal disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  non-invasive imaging method; periodontal diagnosis; periodontal ultrasonography; soft tissue imaging; tridimensional imaging method

Year:  2019        PMID: 31989105      PMCID: PMC6978923          DOI: 10.15386/mpr-1521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Pharm Rep        ISSN: 2602-0807


  41 in total

1.  The evaluation of 20 MHz ultrasonography, computed tomography scans as compared to direct microscopy for periodontal system assessment.

Authors:  Radu Chifor; Mihaela Hedeşiu; Pompei Bolfa; Cornel Catoi; Maria Crişan; Andreea Serbănescu; Alexandru F Badea; Ioana Moga; Mîndra Eugenia Badea
Journal:  Med Ultrason       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 2.  Freehand 3-D Ultrasound Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mohammad Hamed Mozaffari; Won-Sook Lee
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Assessment of cortical bone thickness using ultrasound.

Authors:  Katharina Degen; Daniel Habor; Klaus Radermacher; Stefan Heger; Jaana-Sophia Kern; Stefan Wolfart; Juliana Marotti
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2016-03-27       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  The utility of 40 MHz periodontal ultrasonography in the assessment of gingival inflammation evolution following professional teeth cleaning.

Authors:  Radu Chifor; Mindra Eugenia Badea; Stefan Cristian Vesa; Ioana Chifor
Journal:  Med Ultrason       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.611

5.  Photoacoustic Imaging for Noninvasive Periodontal Probing Depth Measurements.

Authors:  C Y Lin; F Chen; A Hariri; C J Chen; P Wilder-Smith; T Takesh; J V Jokerst
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 6.  The Intraoral Ultrasonography in Dentistry.

Authors:  F Caglayan; I S Bayrakdar
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 0.968

7.  Is musculoskeletal ultrasonography an operator-dependent method or a fast and reliably teachable diagnostic tool? Interreader agreements of three ultrasonographers with different training levels.

Authors:  Sarah Ohrndorf; Lydia Naumann; Jessica Grundey; Tanja Scheel; Alexander K Scheel; Carola Werner; Marina Backhaus
Journal:  Int J Rheumatol       Date:  2010-12-09

8.  Ultrasonography, an operator-dependent modality versus dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in the detection of chondrocalcinosis: with regard to Tanikawa et al.'s study.

Authors:  Angel Checa
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Effect of Cortical Bone Thickness on Detection of Intraosseous Lesions by Ultrasonography.

Authors:  Sadaf Adibi; Alireza Shakibafard; Zohreh Karimi Sarvestani; Najmeh Saadat; Leila Khojastepour
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2015-08-23

10.  Comparison of ultrasound imaging and cone-beam computed tomography for examination of the alveolar bone level: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kim-Cuong T Nguyen; Camila Pachêco-Pereira; Neelambar R Kaipatur; June Cheung; Paul W Major; Lawrence H Le
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Automatic Segmentation of Periodontal Tissue Ultrasound Images with Artificial Intelligence: A Novel Method for Improving Dataset Quality.

Authors:  Radu Chifor; Mircea Hotoleanu; Tiberiu Marita; Tudor Arsenescu; Mihai Adrian Socaciu; Iulia Clara Badea; Ioana Chifor
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.847

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.