Literature DB >> 31988578

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of Perpendicular Plating Versus Conventional Plating in Mandibular Symphysis Fracture.

Lohit Arora1, Siddharth Bhardwaj2, Ghulam Sarwar Hashmi1, Syed Fahad Anwar2, Sajjad Abdur Rahman1.   

Abstract

AIM AND
OBJECTIVE: To perform the comparative finite element analysis of conventional and perpendicular plating in mandibular symphyseal fracture. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Two FE model of mandible were developed and symphyseal fracture was created in both of them. Each fractured model was fixed by conventional method 2.0 mm system and perpendicular method 2.00 mm system. Stresses which developed in plates and mandible after application of load were observed in the model.
RESULTS: Results of the study indicated that perpendicular method was more resistant to displacing forces and rest of the parameters was within the permitted limits.
CONCLUSION: Perpendicular method was reasonably effective as conventional method of fixation for mandibular symphyseal fracture. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conventional plating; Finite element analysis; Mandibular symphysis fracture; Perpendicular plates

Year:  2019        PMID: 31988578      PMCID: PMC6954911          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-019-01244-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  23 in total

1.  A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process.

Authors:  Arne Wagner; Wolfgang Krach; Kurt Schicho; Gerhard Undt; Oliver Ploder; Rolf Ewers
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2002-12

2.  Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study.

Authors:  R T Hart; V V Hennebel; N Thongpreda; W C Van Buskirk; R C Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  [Optimizing titanium osteosynthesis miniplates. Some basic considerations].

Authors:  B Neumayer
Journal:  Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug

Review 4.  Modeling the mechanical behavior of the jaws and their related structures by finite element (FE) analysis.

Authors:  T W Korioth; A Versluis
Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med       Date:  1997

5.  Treatment and complications of mandibular fractures: a 10-year analysis.

Authors:  Bart van den Bergh; Martijn W Heymans; Freya Duvekot; Tymour Forouzanfar
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  A computer study of fracture mobility and strain on biodegradable plates used for fixation of mandibular fractures.

Authors:  J Tams; B Otten; J P van Loon; R R Bos
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Nonunion of the mandible: an analysis of contributing factors.

Authors:  R H Mathog; V Toma; L Clayman; S Wolf
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 2.0-mm locking plates to 2.0-mm standard plates in treatment of mandible fractures.

Authors:  Chad P Collins; Galia Pirinjian-Leonard; Andrew Tolas; Rafael Alcalde
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  A computer study of biodegradable plates for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  J Tams; J P Van Loon; B Otten; R R Bos
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Frequency of maxillofacial injuries in all-terrain vehicle collisions.

Authors:  Pierre-John Holmes; James Koehler; Gerald McGwin; Loring W Rue
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.