Elinor C Harrison1, Adam P Horin2, Peter S Myers1, Kerri S Rawson2, Gammon M Earhart1,2,3. 1. Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. 2. Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. 3. Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Abstract
Purpose: Rhythmic auditory stimulation such as listening to music can alleviate gait bradykinesia in people with Parkinson disease (PD) by increasing spatiotemporal gait features. However, evidence about what specific kinematic alterations lead to these improvements is limited, and differences in responsiveness to cueing likely affect individual motor strategies. Self-generated cueing techniques, such as singing or mental singing, provide similar benefits but no evidence exists about how these techniques affect lower limb joint movement. In this study, we assessed immediate effects of external and self-generated cueing on lower limb movement trajectories during gait. Methods: Using 3D motion capture, we assessed sagittal plane joint angles at the hip, knee, and ankle across 35 participants with PD, divided into responders (n = 23) and non-responders (n = 12) based on a clinically meaningful change in gait speed. Joint motion was assessed as overall range of motion as well as at two key time points during the gait cycle: initial contact and toe-off. Results: Responders used both cue types to increase gait speed and induce increases in overall joint ROM at the hip while only self-generated cues also increased ROM at the ankle. Increased joint excursions for responders were also evident at initial contact and toe-off.Conclusions: Our results indicate that self-generated rhythmic cues can induce similar increases in joint excursions as externally-generated cues and that some people may respond more positively than others. These results provide important insight into how self-generated cueing techniques may be tailored to meet the varied individual needs of people with PD.
Purpose: Rhythmic auditory stimulation such as listening to music can alleviate gait bradykinesia in people with Parkinson disease (PD) by increasing spatiotemporal gait features. However, evidence about what specific kinematic alterations lead to these improvements is limited, and differences in responsiveness to cueing likely affect individual motor strategies. Self-generated cueing techniques, such as singing or mental singing, provide similar benefits but no evidence exists about how these techniques affect lower limb joint movement. In this study, we assessed immediate effects of external and self-generated cueing on lower limb movement trajectories during gait. Methods: Using 3D motion capture, we assessed sagittal plane joint angles at the hip, knee, and ankle across 35 participants with PD, divided into responders (n = 23) and non-responders (n = 12) based on a clinically meaningful change in gait speed. Joint motion was assessed as overall range of motion as well as at two key time points during the gait cycle: initial contact and toe-off. Results: Responders used both cue types to increase gait speed and induce increases in overall joint ROM at the hip while only self-generated cues also increased ROM at the ankle. Increased joint excursions for responders were also evident at initial contact and toe-off.Conclusions: Our results indicate that self-generated rhythmic cues can induce similar increases in joint excursions as externally-generated cues and that some people may respond more positively than others. These results provide important insight into how self-generated cueing techniques may be tailored to meet the varied individual needs of people with PD.
Authors: Ge Wu; Frans C T van der Helm; H E J DirkJan Veeger; Mohsen Makhsous; Peter Van Roy; Carolyn Anglin; Jochem Nagels; Andrew R Karduna; Kevin McQuade; Xuguang Wang; Frederick W Werner; Bryan Buchholz Journal: J Biomech Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Pieter Ginis; Rudi Pirani; Silvia Basaia; Alberto Ferrari; Lorenzo Chiari; Elke Heremans; Colleen G Canning; Alice Nieuwboer Journal: Physiotherapy Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: Michael H Thaut; Ruth R Rice; Thenille Braun Janzen; Corene P Hurt-Thaut; Gerald C McIntosh Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 3.477
Authors: Martin Svehlík; Ernst B Zwick; Gerhardt Steinwender; Wolfgang E Linhart; Petra Schwingenschuh; Petra Katschnig; Erwin Ott; Christian Enzinger Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Chris J Hass; Mark Bishop; Mariana Moscovich; Elizabeth L Stegemöller; Jared Skinner; Irene A Malaty; Aparna Wagle Shukla; Nikolaus McFarland; Michael S Okun Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Simone Dalla Bella; Charles-Etienne Benoit; Nicolas Farrugia; Peter E Keller; Hellmuth Obrig; Stefan Mainka; Sonja A Kotz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 4.379