BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gait dysfunction is a common target for pharmacological, behavioral, and surgical interventions in persons with Parkinson disease. However, the responsiveness of gait speed, that is, clinically important difference, is not well described in the literature for this population. The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of meaningful difference in gait speed using multiple methods of assessment and utilizing a large sample of participants inclusive of various stages of disease severity. METHODS: Gait speed was measured using an instrumented walkway in 324 ambulatory persons with idiopathic Parkinson disease. Cross-sectional analysis of the clinically important difference for gait speed was performed using distribution- and anchor-based approaches: disability (Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale), disease stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale), and severity (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale). RESULTS: Using distribution-based analyses and effect size metrics, the small important difference in gait speed was 0.06 m/s, moderate was 0.14 m/s, and large was 0.22 m/s. Applying previously established cut-points for small, moderate, and large change in the motor scale score, the associated changes in gait speed that might be expected are 0.02, 0.06, and 0.10 m/s. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed that the clinically important difference in gait speed among persons with Parkinson disease on medication ranged from 0.05 m/s to 0.22 m/s by distribution-based analysis and ranged from 0.02 m/s to 0.18 m/s per level within the anchor-based metrics. These data will aid in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions to improve gait speed in persons with Parkinson disease.Video Abstract available. See video (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A77) for more insights from the authors.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Gait dysfunction is a common target for pharmacological, behavioral, and surgical interventions in persons with Parkinson disease. However, the responsiveness of gait speed, that is, clinically important difference, is not well described in the literature for this population. The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of meaningful difference in gait speed using multiple methods of assessment and utilizing a large sample of participants inclusive of various stages of disease severity. METHODS: Gait speed was measured using an instrumented walkway in 324 ambulatory persons with idiopathic Parkinson disease. Cross-sectional analysis of the clinically important difference for gait speed was performed using distribution- and anchor-based approaches: disability (Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale), disease stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale), and severity (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale). RESULTS: Using distribution-based analyses and effect size metrics, the small important difference in gait speed was 0.06 m/s, moderate was 0.14 m/s, and large was 0.22 m/s. Applying previously established cut-points for small, moderate, and large change in the motor scale score, the associated changes in gait speed that might be expected are 0.02, 0.06, and 0.10 m/s. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed that the clinically important difference in gait speed among persons with Parkinson disease on medication ranged from 0.05 m/s to 0.22 m/s by distribution-based analysis and ranged from 0.02 m/s to 0.18 m/s per level within the anchor-based metrics. These data will aid in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions to improve gait speed in persons with Parkinson disease.Video Abstract available. See video (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A77) for more insights from the authors.
Authors: Elinor C Harrison; Adam P Horin; Peter S Myers; Kerri S Rawson; Gammon M Earhart Journal: Somatosens Mot Res Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 1.111
Authors: Miriam R Rafferty; Janey Prodoehl; Julie A Robichaud; Fabian J David; Cynthia Poon; Lisa C Goelz; David E Vaillancourt; Wendy M Kohrt; Cynthia L Comella; Daniel M Corcos Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Zachary Kabelac; Christopher G Tarolli; Christopher Snyder; Blake Feldman; Alistair Glidden; Chen-Yu Hsu; Rumen Hristov; E Ray Dorsey; Dina Katabi Journal: Digit Biomark Date: 2019-04-30
Authors: Hafizur Rahman; Iraklis I Pipinos; Jason M Johanning; George Casale; Mark A Williams; Jonathan R Thompson; Yohanis O'Neill-Castro; Sara A Myers Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Terry D Ellis; Cristina Colón-Semenza; Tamara R DeAngelis; Cathi A Thomas; Marie-Hélène Saint Hilaire; Gammon M Earhart; Leland E Dibble Journal: Semin Neurol Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 3.420
Authors: Sommer L Amundsen-Huffmaster; Matthew N Petrucci; Maria E Linn-Evans; Jae Woo Chung; Michael J Howell; Aleksandar Videnovic; Paul J Tuite; Scott E Cooper; Colum D MacKinnon Journal: J Parkinsons Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Iramaia Salomão Alexandre de Assis; Gustavo José Luvizutto; Ana Caroline Magrini Bruno; Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza Journal: J Chiropr Med Date: 2020-12-15
Authors: Jan Mehrholz; Joachim Kugler; Alexander Storch; Marcus Pohl; Kathleen Hirsch; Bernhard Elsner Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-09-13