Ryan J Watson1, Minjeong Park2, Ashley B Taylor2, Jessica N Fish3, Heather L Corliss4, Marla E Eisenberg5, Elizabeth M Saewyc2. 1. Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut. 2. Stigma and Resilience Among Vulnerable Youth Centre, School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 3. Department of Family Science, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland. 4. School of Public Health and Institute for Behavioral and Community Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California. 5. Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abstract
Purpose: Using representative school-based data and community-level primary data, we investigated how environmental factors (e.g., school and community climate) might be protective against substance use behaviors among a vulnerable population of adolescents. Methods: We analyzed a sample of 2678 sexual minority adolescents using a combination of student-level data (British Columbia Adolescent Health Survey) and primary community-level data (assessing lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer [LGBTQ]-specific community and school environments). Using multilevel logistic regression models, we examined associations between lifetime substance use (alcohol, illegal drugs, marijuana, nonmedical use of prescription drugs, and smoking) and community-level predictors (community and school LGBTQ supportiveness). Results: Above and beyond student characteristics (e.g., age and years living in Canada), sexual minority adolescents residing in communities with more LGBTQ supports (i.e., more supportive climates) had lower odds of lifetime illegal drug use (for boys and girls), marijuana use (for girls), and smoking (for girls). Specifically, in communities with more frequent LGBTQ events (such as Pride events), the odds of substance use among sexual minority adolescents living in those communities was lower compared with their counterparts living in communities with fewer LGBTQ supports. Conclusions: The availability of LGBTQ community-level organizations, events, and programs may serve as protective factors for substance use among sexual minority adolescents. In particular, LGBTQ-supportive community factors were negatively associated with substance use, which has important implications for our investment in community programs, laws, and organizations that advance the visibility and rights of LGBTQ people.
Purpose: Using representative school-based data and community-level primary data, we investigated how environmental factors (e.g., school and community climate) might be protective against substance use behaviors among a vulnerable population of adolescents. Methods: We analyzed a sample of 2678 sexual minority adolescents using a combination of student-level data (British Columbia Adolescent Health Survey) and primary community-level data (assessing lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer [LGBTQ]-specific community and school environments). Using multilevel logistic regression models, we examined associations between lifetime substance use (alcohol, illegal drugs, marijuana, nonmedical use of prescription drugs, and smoking) and community-level predictors (community and school LGBTQ supportiveness). Results: Above and beyond student characteristics (e.g., age and years living in Canada), sexual minority adolescents residing in communities with more LGBTQ supports (i.e., more supportive climates) had lower odds of lifetime illegal drug use (for boys and girls), marijuana use (for girls), and smoking (for girls). Specifically, in communities with more frequent LGBTQ events (such as Pride events), the odds of substance use among sexual minority adolescents living in those communities was lower compared with their counterparts living in communities with fewer LGBTQ supports. Conclusions: The availability of LGBTQ community-level organizations, events, and programs may serve as protective factors for substance use among sexual minority adolescents. In particular, LGBTQ-supportive community factors were negatively associated with substance use, which has important implications for our investment in community programs, laws, and organizations that advance the visibility and rights of LGBTQ people.
Entities:
Keywords:
GSAs; LGBTQ; SGM; communities; school policy
Authors: Elizabeth M Saewyc; Greta R Bauer; Carol L Skay; Linda H Bearinger; Michael D Resnick; Elizabeth Reis; Aileen Murphy Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Michael P Marshal; Mark S Friedman; Ron Stall; Kevin M King; Jonathan Miles; Melanie A Gold; Oscar G Bukstein; Jennifer Q Morse Journal: Addiction Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Amelia E Talley; Tonda L Hughes; Frances Aranda; Michelle Birkett; Michael P Marshal Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jacklyn D Foley; Amelia M Stanton; Caleigh Shepard; Jennifer Morris; Conall O'Cleirigh; Jennifer Potter; Abigail W Batchelder Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2022-05-03
Authors: Ryan Drab; James R Wolfe; Tanaka Chavanduka; Erin E Bonar; Jodie L Guest; Lisa Hightow-Weidman; Amanda D Castel; Keith J Horvath; Patrick S Sullivan; Rob Stephenson; José Bauermeister Journal: J Community Psychol Date: 2021-10-29
Authors: Michael Chaiton; Rebecca Billington; Ilana Copeland; Luc Grey; Alex Abramovich Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Gregory Sallabank; Tanaka M D Chavanduka; Alison R Walsh; Patrick Sullivan; James Wolfe; Rebecca Filipowicz; Erin E Bonar; Keith J Horvath; Benyam Hailu; José Bauermeister; Rob Stephenson Journal: Sex Res Social Policy Date: 2021-10-22