Literature DB >> 31984345

Evaluating a handheld decision support device in pediatric intensive care settings.

Tera L Reynolds1, Patricia R DeLucia2, Karen A Esquibel3, Todd Gage4, Noah J Wheeler5, J Adam Randell6, James G Stevenson7, Kai Zheng1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate end-user acceptance and the effect of a commercial handheld decision support device in pediatric intensive care settings. The technology, pac2, was designed to assist nurses in calculating medication dose volumes and infusion rates at the bedside.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The devices, manufactured by InformMed Inc., were deployed in the pediatric and neonatal intensive care units in 2 health systems. This mixed methods study assessed end-user acceptance, as well as pac2's effect on the cognitive load associated with bedside dose calculations and the rate of administration errors. Towards this end, data were collected in both pre- and postimplementation phases, including through ethnographic observations, semistructured interviews, and surveys.
RESULTS: Although participants desired a handheld decision support tool such as pac2, their use of pac2 was limited. The nature of the critical care environment, nurses' risk perceptions, and the usability of the technology emerged as major barriers to use. Data did not reveal significant differences in cognitive load or administration errors after pac2 was deployed. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: Despite its potential for reducing adverse medication events, the commercial standalone device evaluated in the study was not used by the nursing participants and thus had very limited effect. Our results have implications for the development and deployment of similar mobile decision support technologies. For example, they suggest that integrating the technology into hospitals' existing IT infrastructure and employing targeted implementation strategies may facilitate nurse acceptance. Ultimately, the usability of the design will be essential to reaping any potential benefits. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alert systems; computers; handheld [L01.224.230.260.550.500]; human factors and ergonomics [F02.784.412]; implantable [E07.505.254]; infusion pumps; medication [N04.452.515.360.500]; medication errors [E02.319.529]

Year:  2019        PMID: 31984345      PMCID: PMC6951880          DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMIA Open        ISSN: 2574-2531


  51 in total

Review 1.  Methodological variations and their effects on reported medication administration error rates.

Authors:  Monsey Chan McLeod; Nick Barber; Bryony Dean Franklin
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 7.035

2.  Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.

Authors:  Martin A Makary; Michael Daniel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-05-03

3.  ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: Prescribing and transcribing-2016.

Authors:  Craig A Pedersen; Philip J Schneider; Douglas J Scheckelhoff
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.637

4.  Prevalence of adverse events in pediatric intensive care units in the United States.

Authors:  Swati Agarwal; David Classen; Gitte Larsen; Nancy M Tofil; Leslie W Hayes; Janice E Sullivan; Stephanie A Storgion; Barbara J Coopes; Vicki Craig; Christine Jaderlund; Hema Bisarya; Layla Parast; Paul Sharek
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.624

5.  Defining health information technology-related errors: new developments since to err is human.

Authors:  Dean F Sittig; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-25

6.  Medication errors in neonatal and paediatric intensive-care units.

Authors:  T N Raju; S Kecskes; J P Thornton; M Perry; S Feldman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-08-12       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The hazard of software updates to clinical workstations: a natural experiment.

Authors:  Adam B Landman; Sukhjit S Takhar; Samuel L Wang; Anabela Cardoso; Joshua M Kosowsky; Ali S Raja; Ramin Khorasani; Eric G Poon
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Development, testing, and findings of a pediatric-focused trigger tool to identify medication-related harm in US children's hospitals.

Authors:  Glenn S Takata; Wilbert Mason; Carol Taketomo; Tina Logsdon; Paul J Sharek
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 9.  Effect of fatigue, workload, and environment on patient safety in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Vicki L Montgomery
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.624

10.  Medication error prevention by clinical pharmacists in two children's hospitals.

Authors:  H L Folli; R L Poole; W E Benitz; J C Russo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  2 in total

1.  Automation in nursing decision support systems: A systematic review of effects on decision making, care delivery, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Saba Akbar; David Lyell; Farah Magrabi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 7.942

2.  Usability study of a new tool for nutritional and glycemic management in adult intensive care: Glucosafe 2.

Authors:  Aude de Watteville; Ulrike Pielmeier; Séverine Graf; Nils Siegenthaler; Bernard Plockyn; Steen Andreassen; Claudia-Paula Heidegger
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.502

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.