Literature DB >> 18381521

Development, testing, and findings of a pediatric-focused trigger tool to identify medication-related harm in US children's hospitals.

Glenn S Takata1, Wilbert Mason, Carol Taketomo, Tina Logsdon, Paul J Sharek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to develop a pediatric-focused tool for adverse drug event detection and describe the incidence and characteristics of adverse drug events in children's hospitals identified by this tool.
METHODS: A pediatric-specific trigger tool for adverse drug event detection was developed and tested. Eighty patients from each site were randomly selected for retrospective chart review. All adverse drug events identified using the trigger tool were evaluated for severity, preventability, ability to mitigate, ability to identify the event earlier, and presence of associated occurrence report. Each trigger and the entire tool were evaluated for positive predictive value.
RESULTS: Review of 960 randomly selected charts from 12 children's hospitals revealed 2388 triggers (2.49 per patient) and 107 unique adverse drug events. Mean adverse drug event rates were 11.1 per 100 patients, 15.7 per 1000 patient-days, and 1.23 per 1000 medication doses. The positive predictive value of the trigger tool was 3.7%. Twenty-two percent of all adverse drug events were deemed preventable, 17.8% could have been identified earlier, and 16.8% could have been mitigated more effectively. Ninety-seven percent of the identified adverse drug events resulted in mild, temporary harm. Only 3.7% of adverse drug events were identified in existing hospital-based occurrence reports. The most common adverse drug events identified were pruritus and nausea, the most common medication classes causing adverse drug events were opioid analgesics and antibiotics, and the most common stages of the medication management process associated with preventable adverse drug events were monitoring and prescribing/ordering.
CONCLUSIONS: Adverse drug event rates in hospitalized children are substantially higher than previously described. Most adverse drug events resulted in temporary harm, and 22% were classified as preventable. Only 3.7% were identified by using traditional voluntary reporting methods. Our pediatric-focused trigger tool is effective at identifying adverse drug events in inpatient pediatric populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18381521     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-1779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  62 in total

1.  Computerized pharmaceutical algorithm reduces medication administration errors during simulated resuscitations.

Authors:  Girish G Deshpande; Adalberto Torres; David L Buchanan; Susan C Shane Gray; Suzanne C Brown; Theresa Hoadley; Patricia L Ruppel; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-10

Review 2.  Pharmacovigilance in pediatrics: current challenges.

Authors:  Antje Neubert
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Performance characteristics of a methodology to quantify adverse events over time in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Paul J Sharek; Gareth Parry; Donald Goldmann; Kate Bones; Andrew Hackbarth; Roger Resar; Frances A Griffin; Dale Rhoda; Cathy Murphy; Christopher P Landrigan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Preventability of drug-related harms - part I: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robin E Ferner; Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  The impact of electronic medical records data sources on an adverse drug event quality measure.

Authors:  Michael G Kahn; Daksha Ranade
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Adverse drug event detection in pediatric oncology and hematology patients: using medication triggers to identify patient harm in a specialized pediatric patient population.

Authors:  Rosemary J Call; Jonathan D Burlison; Jennifer J Robertson; Jeffrey R Scott; Donald K Baker; Michael G Rossi; Scott C Howard; James M Hoffman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Recognizing Differences in Hospital Quality Performance for Pediatric Inpatient Care.

Authors:  Jay G Berry; Alan M Zaslavsky; Sara L Toomey; Alyna T Chien; Jisun Jang; Maria C Bryant; David J Klein; William J Kaplan; Mark A Schuster
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Epidemiology of Polypharmacy and Potential Drug-Drug Interactions Among Pediatric Patients in ICUs of U.S. Children's Hospitals.

Authors:  Dingwei Dai; James A Feinstein; Wynne Morrison; Athena F Zuppa; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.624

9.  Adverse events among children in Canadian hospitals: the Canadian Paediatric Adverse Events Study.

Authors:  Anne G Matlow; G Ross Baker; Virginia Flintoft; Douglas Cochrane; Maitreya Coffey; Eyal Cohen; Catherine M G Cronin; Rita Damignani; Robert Dubé; Roger Galbraith; Dawn Hartfield; Leigh Anne Newhook; Cheri Nijssen-Jordan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Tailoring adverse drug event surveillance to the paediatric inpatient.

Authors:  Andrea L Long; Monica M Horvath; Heidi Cozart; Julie Eckstrand; Julie Whitehurst; Jeffrey Ferranti
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.