OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to develop a pediatric-focused tool for adverse drug event detection and describe the incidence and characteristics of adverse drug events in children's hospitals identified by this tool. METHODS: A pediatric-specific trigger tool for adverse drug event detection was developed and tested. Eighty patients from each site were randomly selected for retrospective chart review. All adverse drug events identified using the trigger tool were evaluated for severity, preventability, ability to mitigate, ability to identify the event earlier, and presence of associated occurrence report. Each trigger and the entire tool were evaluated for positive predictive value. RESULTS: Review of 960 randomly selected charts from 12 children's hospitals revealed 2388 triggers (2.49 per patient) and 107 unique adverse drug events. Mean adverse drug event rates were 11.1 per 100 patients, 15.7 per 1000 patient-days, and 1.23 per 1000 medication doses. The positive predictive value of the trigger tool was 3.7%. Twenty-two percent of all adverse drug events were deemed preventable, 17.8% could have been identified earlier, and 16.8% could have been mitigated more effectively. Ninety-seven percent of the identified adverse drug events resulted in mild, temporary harm. Only 3.7% of adverse drug events were identified in existing hospital-based occurrence reports. The most common adverse drug events identified were pruritus and nausea, the most common medication classes causing adverse drug events were opioid analgesics and antibiotics, and the most common stages of the medication management process associated with preventable adverse drug events were monitoring and prescribing/ordering. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse drug event rates in hospitalized children are substantially higher than previously described. Most adverse drug events resulted in temporary harm, and 22% were classified as preventable. Only 3.7% were identified by using traditional voluntary reporting methods. Our pediatric-focused trigger tool is effective at identifying adverse drug events in inpatient pediatric populations.
OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to develop a pediatric-focused tool for adverse drug event detection and describe the incidence and characteristics of adverse drug events in children's hospitals identified by this tool. METHODS: A pediatric-specific trigger tool for adverse drug event detection was developed and tested. Eighty patients from each site were randomly selected for retrospective chart review. All adverse drug events identified using the trigger tool were evaluated for severity, preventability, ability to mitigate, ability to identify the event earlier, and presence of associated occurrence report. Each trigger and the entire tool were evaluated for positive predictive value. RESULTS: Review of 960 randomly selected charts from 12 children's hospitals revealed 2388 triggers (2.49 per patient) and 107 unique adverse drug events. Mean adverse drug event rates were 11.1 per 100 patients, 15.7 per 1000 patient-days, and 1.23 per 1000 medication doses. The positive predictive value of the trigger tool was 3.7%. Twenty-two percent of all adverse drug events were deemed preventable, 17.8% could have been identified earlier, and 16.8% could have been mitigated more effectively. Ninety-seven percent of the identified adverse drug events resulted in mild, temporary harm. Only 3.7% of adverse drug events were identified in existing hospital-based occurrence reports. The most common adverse drug events identified were pruritus and nausea, the most common medication classes causing adverse drug events were opioid analgesics and antibiotics, and the most common stages of the medication management process associated with preventable adverse drug events were monitoring and prescribing/ordering. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse drug event rates in hospitalized children are substantially higher than previously described. Most adverse drug events resulted in temporary harm, and 22% were classified as preventable. Only 3.7% were identified by using traditional voluntary reporting methods. Our pediatric-focused trigger tool is effective at identifying adverse drug events in inpatient pediatric populations.
Authors: Girish G Deshpande; Adalberto Torres; David L Buchanan; Susan C Shane Gray; Suzanne C Brown; Theresa Hoadley; Patricia L Ruppel; Joseph D Tobias Journal: J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther Date: 2010-10
Authors: Paul J Sharek; Gareth Parry; Donald Goldmann; Kate Bones; Andrew Hackbarth; Roger Resar; Frances A Griffin; Dale Rhoda; Cathy Murphy; Christopher P Landrigan Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2010-08-16 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Rosemary J Call; Jonathan D Burlison; Jennifer J Robertson; Jeffrey R Scott; Donald K Baker; Michael G Rossi; Scott C Howard; James M Hoffman Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2014-04-25 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Jay G Berry; Alan M Zaslavsky; Sara L Toomey; Alyna T Chien; Jisun Jang; Maria C Bryant; David J Klein; William J Kaplan; Mark A Schuster Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Dingwei Dai; James A Feinstein; Wynne Morrison; Athena F Zuppa; Chris Feudtner Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Anne G Matlow; G Ross Baker; Virginia Flintoft; Douglas Cochrane; Maitreya Coffey; Eyal Cohen; Catherine M G Cronin; Rita Damignani; Robert Dubé; Roger Galbraith; Dawn Hartfield; Leigh Anne Newhook; Cheri Nijssen-Jordan Journal: CMAJ Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Andrea L Long; Monica M Horvath; Heidi Cozart; Julie Eckstrand; Julie Whitehurst; Jeffrey Ferranti Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2010-05-28