Literature DB >> 31984136

The multiplex structure of the mental lexicon influences picture naming in people with aphasia.

Nichol Castro1, Massimo Stella2.   

Abstract

An emerging area of research in cognitive science is the utilization of networks to model the structure and processes of the mental lexicon in healthy and clinical populations, like aphasia. Previous research has focused on only one type of word similarity at a time (e.g., semantic relationships), even though words are multi-faceted. Here, we investigate lexical retrieval in a picture naming task from people with Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia and healthy controls by utilizing a multiplex network structure that accounts for the interplay between multiple semantic and phonological relationships among words in the mental lexicon. Extending upon previous work, we focused on the global network measure of closeness centrality which is known to capture spreading activation, an important process supporting lexical retrieval. We conducted a series of logistic regression models predicting the probability of correct picture naming. We tested whether multiplex closeness centrality was a better predictor of picture naming performance than single-layer closeness centralities, other network measures assessing local and meso-scale structure, psycholinguistic variables and group differences. We also examined production gaps, or the difference between the likelihood of producing a word with the lowest and highest closeness centralities. Our results indicated that multiplex closeness centrality was a significant predictor of picture naming performance, where words with high closeness centrality were more likely to be produced than words with low closeness centrality. Additionally, multiplex closeness centrality outperformed single-layer closeness centralities and other multiplex network measures, and remained a significant predictor after controlling for psycholinguistic variables and group differences. Furthermore, we found that the facilitative effect of closeness centrality was similar for both types of aphasia. Our results underline the importance of integrating multiple measures of word similarities in cognitive language networks for better understanding lexical retrieval in aphasia, with an eye towards future clinical applications. © The authors 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aphasia; complex systems; language sciences; lexical retrieval; mental lexicon; multiplex networks; network science; picture naming

Year:  2019        PMID: 31984136      PMCID: PMC6961494          DOI: 10.1093/comnet/cnz012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Complex Netw        ISSN: 2051-1310


  35 in total

1.  What is free association and what does it measure?

Authors:  D L Nelson; C L McEvoy; S Dennis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

2.  The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

Review 3.  Stages of lexical access in language production.

Authors:  G S Dell; P G O'Seaghdha
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-03

4.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Hans Stadthagen-Gonzalez; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-12

Review 5.  Networks in cognitive science.

Authors:  Andrea Baronchelli; Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho; Romualdo Pastor-Satorras; Nick Chater; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The large-scale structure of semantic networks: statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth.

Authors:  Mark Steyvers; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-01-02

7.  The semantic distance task: Quantifying semantic distance with semantic network path length.

Authors:  Yoed N Kenett; Effi Levi; David Anaki; Miriam Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers.

Authors:  G S Dell; M F Schwartz; N Martin; E M Saffran; D A Gagnon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  How children explore the phonological network in child-directed speech: A survival analysis of children's first word productions.

Authors:  Matthew T Carlson; Morgan Sonderegger; Max Bane
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.059

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of modern network science to the cognitive sciences: revisiting research spirals of representation and process.

Authors:  Nichol Castro; Cynthia S Q Siew
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.704

2.  The Challenge of Achieving Greater Generalization in Phonological Treatment of Aphasia.

Authors:  Nichol Castro; Stephen E Nadeau; Diane L Kendall
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.773

3.  Distance Entropy Cartography Characterises Centrality in Complex Networks.

Authors:  Massimo Stella; Manlio De Domenico
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.524

4.  Forma mentis networks map how nursing and engineering students enhance their mindsets about innovation and health during professional growth.

Authors:  Massimo Stella; Anna Zaytseva
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2020-03-02

5.  Text-mining forma mentis networks reconstruct public perception of the STEM gender gap in social media.

Authors:  Massimo Stella
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2020-09-14

6.  Word Distance Affects Subjective Temporal Distance.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Yu Liu; Jun Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.