Literature DB >> 31983034

Oral contraceptive use, bone mineral density, and bone turnover markers over 12 months in college-aged females.

Hawley C Almstedt1, Makenzie M Cook2, Lily F Bramble2, Deepa V Dabir3, Joseph W LaBrie4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers between combined oral contraceptive (COC) and non-COC users over 12 months.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: COC users (n = 34, age = 19.2 ± 0.5) and non-COC users (n = 28, age = 19.3 ± 0.6) provided serum at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. C-terminal telopepetides (CTX) and pro-collagen type 1 N-terminal propeptides (P1NP) were determined using ELISA. BMD was measured at the three time points using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
RESULTS: COC users had greater CTX than non-COC users at baseline (18.6 ± 8.2 vs. 13.8 ± 5.3 ng/mL, P = 0.021) and 6 months (20.4 ± 10.3 vs. 14.2 ± 8.5 ng/mL, P = 0.018). Controlling for lean mass, groups were similar in BMD. Over 12 months, non-COC users maintained BMD at the spine, while the COC users declined 2.2% in lateral spine BMD (0.773 ± 0.014 to 0.756 ± 0.014 g/cm2, P = 0.03) and 0.7% in anterior-posterior spine BMD (1.005 ± 0.015 to 0.998 ± 0.015 g/cm2, P = 0.069). Non-COC users increased in BMD of the whole body over 12 months (P < 0.001) while COC users had no change. Women who began COCs within 4 years after menarche had lower BMD at the hip and whole body. Women taking very low dose COCs (20 mcg ethinyl estradiol, EE) significantly declined in CTX, P1NP, and lateral spine BMD in comparison to participants using low dose COCs (30/35 mcg EE).
CONCLUSION: College-aged women who did not use COCs increased BMD of the whole body, while COC users had elevated bone turnover, declines in spinal BMD, and lack of bone acquisition of the whole body over 12 months. Young females who initiate COC use early after menarche may experience skeletal detriments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CTX; Menarche; P1NP; Peak bone mass; Premenopausal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31983034     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-019-01081-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  27 in total

Review 1.  Birth and death of bone cells: basic regulatory mechanisms and implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  S C Manolagas
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Low-dose estrogen combined oral contraceptives may negatively influence physiological bone mineral density acquisition during adolescence.

Authors:  David Cibula; Jana Skrenkova; Martin Hill; Jan J Stepan
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 3.  Physiology, production and action of progesterone.

Authors:  Stefania Taraborrelli
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  The Determinants of Peak Bone Mass.

Authors:  Catherine M Gordon; Babette S Zemel; Tishya A L Wren; Mary B Leonard; Laura K Bachrach; Frank Rauch; Vicente Gilsanz; Clifford J Rosen; Karen K Winer
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Comparison of the skeletal effects of the progestogens desogestrel and levonorgestrel in oral contraceptive preparations in young women: controlled, open, partly randomized investigation over 13 cycles.

Authors:  Manfred Hartard; Christine Kleinmond; Peter Luppa; Otto Zelger; Kathrin Egger; Michael Wiseman; Ernst Rainer Weissenbacher; Dieter Felsenberg; Reinhold G Erben
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  The effect of oral contraceptive different patterns of use on circulating IGF-1 and bone mineral density in healthy premenopausal women.

Authors:  Amany Y Elkazaz; Khaled Salama
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  The National Osteoporosis Foundation's position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations.

Authors:  C M Weaver; C M Gordon; K F Janz; H J Kalkwarf; J M Lappe; R Lewis; M O'Karma; T C Wallace; B S Zemel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  A summary of the influence of exogenous estrogen administration across the lifespan on the GH/IGF-1 axis and implications for bone health.

Authors:  Emily A Southmayd; Mary Jane De Souza
Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.372

9.  Lumbar spine peak bone mass and bone turnover in men and women: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  J S Walsh; Y M Henry; D Fatayerji; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Oestrogen replacement improves bone mineral density in oligo-amenorrhoeic athletes: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Kathryn E Ackerman; Vibha Singhal; Charumathi Baskaran; Meghan Slattery; Karen Joanie Campoverde Reyes; Alexander Toth; Kamryn T Eddy; Mary L Bouxsein; Hang Lee; Anne Klibanski; Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  2 in total

1.  Association of Short-Term Changes in Menstrual Frequency, Medication Use, Weight and Exercise on Bone Mineral Density in College-Aged Women.

Authors:  Stacie H Fleischer; Annalisa K Freire; Katie Brown; Andrew Creer; Dennis L Eggett; Susan Fullmer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 2.  The Specificities of Elite Female Athletes: A Multidisciplinary Approach.

Authors:  Carole Castanier; Valérie Bougault; Caroline Teulier; Christelle Jaffré; Sandrine Schiano-Lomoriello; Nancy Vibarel-Rebot; Aude Villemain; Nathalie Rieth; Christine Le-Scanff; Corinne Buisson; Katia Collomp
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.