Literature DB >> 17046377

Comparison of the skeletal effects of the progestogens desogestrel and levonorgestrel in oral contraceptive preparations in young women: controlled, open, partly randomized investigation over 13 cycles.

Manfred Hartard1, Christine Kleinmond, Peter Luppa, Otto Zelger, Kathrin Egger, Michael Wiseman, Ernst Rainer Weissenbacher, Dieter Felsenberg, Reinhold G Erben.   

Abstract

AIM: This 12-month study was conducted to evaluate the skeletal effects of two monophasic oral contraceptives containing 20 mug of ethinylestradiol and 100 mug of levonorgestrel (LEVO) or 150 mug of desogestrel (DESO).
METHODS: Fifty-two women (18-24 years) were randomized into the DESO group or the LEVO group; 36 women served as controls. The areal bone mineral density (aBMD) of the femoral neck and the lumbar spine was evaluated by DXA, and parameters of bone geometry and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) were assessed by peripheral quantitative computed tomography at the distal radius and the tibia.
RESULTS: The LEVO group did not lose vertebral aBMD, whereas women in the DESO group lost 1.5%. At the distal radius and the tibia (shank level, 14%), LEVO induced an increase in total cross-sectional area, indicating increased periosteal bone formation. Radial trabecular vBMD declined by 1.4+/-1.8% in the DESO group, while it remained unchanged in the LEVO group.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the skeletal effects of OC preparations may be influenced by progestogenic components in young women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17046377     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  5 in total

1.  Menstrual Irregularity, Hormonal Contraceptive Use, and Bone Stress Injuries in Collegiate Female Athletes in the United States.

Authors:  Jennifer Cheng; Kristen A Santiago; Zafir Abutalib; Kate E Temme; Ann Hulme; Marci A Goolsby; Carrie L Esopenko; Ellen K Casey
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Oral contraceptive use, bone mineral density, and bone turnover markers over 12 months in college-aged females.

Authors:  Hawley C Almstedt; Makenzie M Cook; Lily F Bramble; Deepa V Dabir; Joseph W LaBrie
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Are the Effects of Oral and Vaginal Contraceptives on Bone Formation in Young Women Mediated via the Growth Hormone-IGF-I Axis?

Authors:  Heather C M Allaway; Madhusmita Misra; Emily A Southmayd; Michael S Stone; Connie M Weaver; Dylan L Petkus; Mary Jane De Souza
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 4.  The effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y Zimmerman; M J C Eijkemans; H J T Coelingh Bennink; M A Blankenstein; B C J M Fauser
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 5.  Bone health in estrogen-free contraception.

Authors:  P Hadji; E Colli; P-A Regidor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 4.507

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.