| Literature DB >> 31981215 |
Di Liu1,2, Gina M Geiselman1,2, Samuel Coradetti1,2, Ya-Fang Cheng3, James Kirby1,2, Jan-Philip Prahl2,4,5, Oslo Jacobson2,4,5, Eric R Sundstrom2,4,5, Deepti Tanjore2,4,5, Jeffrey M Skerker3, John Gladden1,2,6.
Abstract
Fatty alcohols (FOHs) are important feedstocks in the chemical industry to produce detergents, cosmetics, and lubricants. Microbial production of FOHs has become an attractive alternative to production in plants and animals due to growing energy demands and environmental concerns. However, inhibition of cell growth caused by intracellular FOH accumulation is one major issue that limits FOH titers in microbial hosts. In addition, identification of FOH-specific exporters remains a challenge and previous studies towards this end are limited. To alleviate the toxicity issue, we exploited nonionic surfactants to promote the export of FOHs in Rhodosporidium toruloides, an oleaginous yeast that is considered an attractive next-generation host for the production of fatty acid-derived chemicals. Our results showed FOH export efficiency was dramatically improved and the growth inhibition was alleviated in the presence of small amounts of tergitol and other surfactants. As a result, FOH titers increase by 4.3-fold at bench scale to 352.6 mg/L. With further process optimization in a 2-L bioreactor, the titer was further increased to 1.6 g/L. The method we show here can potentially be applied to other microbial hosts and may facilitate the commercialization of microbial FOH production.Entities:
Keywords: R. toruloides; fatty alcohol; nonionic surfactants; product export
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31981215 PMCID: PMC7187362 DOI: 10.1002/bit.27285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Bioeng ISSN: 0006-3592 Impact factor: 4.530
Source organisms of fatty acyl‐CoA reductases used in this study
| Gene | Source Organism | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Maqu2507 |
| Fillet et al. ( |
| TaFAR2 | Barn owl | Hellenbrand, Biester, Gruber, Hamberg, and Frentzen ( |
| Maqu2220 |
| Fillet et al. ( |
| AtCER4 | Arabidopsis | Rowland et al. ( |
| AmFAR1 | Honey bee | Teerawanichpan, Robertson, and Qiu ( |
| TaFAR1 | Barn owl | Hellenbrand et al. ( |
| GgFAR1 | Domestic chicken | Hellenbrand et al. ( |
| AdFAR1 | Domestic goose | Hellenbrand et al., ( |
Figure 1Characterization of fatty alcohol production and cell growth in Rhodosporidium toruloides. (a) Fatty alcohol production from various fatty acyl‐CoA reductases under two promoters, pGAPDH and pANT. The chain length distribution of fatty alcohols are shown in the inset. (b) Cell growth of a high fatty alcohol‐producing strain (maquFOH) and a low fatty alcohol producing strain (LFOH)
Figure 2Effects of detergents on fatty alcohol titer, cell growth, and fatty alcohol yield. (a) Fatty alcohol production (bars) and cell growth (dots) of maquFOH under a gradient of various detergents. T20, T80, T100 and Ter denote TWEEN 20, TWEEN 80, Triton‐X100, and tergitol; 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 5 denote the percentage of the respective detergents. (b) Fatty alcohol concentrations in the overlay and inside the cell. (c) Cell growth of maquFOH with 0.1% tergitol and without tergitol. (d) Fatty alcohol yields under various tergitol concentrations
Figure 3Fatty alcohol production and high producer percentage in the mixed culture of maquFOH and LFOH. (a) Fatty alcohol titers for LFOH and the mixed culture with and without tergitol. (b) The population percentage of maquFOH in the mixed culture with and without tergitol
Figure 4The fatty alcohol production profile of maquFOH in a 2 L fed‐batch bioreactor with the addition of 0.1% tergitol. Fatty alcohol concentrations, cell growth, glucose concentrations, and C/N ratio are plotted against time