| Literature DB >> 31980676 |
C Mooney1,2, P J McKiernan3, R Raoof1,4, D C Henshall1,5, B Linnane6,7, P McNally6,8, A M A Glasgow9, C M Greene3.
Abstract
A gender gap exists in cystic fibrosis (CF). Here we investigate whether plasma microRNA expression profiles differ between the sexes in CF children. MicroRNA expression was quantified in paediatric CF plasma (n = 12; six females; Age range:1-6; Median Age: 3; 9 p.Phe508del homo- or heterozygotes) using TaqMan OpenArray Human miRNA Panels. Principal component analysis indicated differences in male versus female miRNA profiles. The miRNA array analysis revealed two miRNAs which were significantly increased in the female samples (miR-885-5p; fold change (FC):5.07, adjusted p value: 0.026 and miR-193a-5p; FC:2.6, adjusted p value: 0.031), although only miR-885-5p was validated as increased in females using specific qPCR assay (p < 0.0001). Gene ontology analysis of miR-885-5p validated targets identified cell migration, motility and fibrosis as processes potentially affected, with RAC1-mediated signalling featuring significantly. There is a significant increase in miR-885-5p in plasma of females versus males with CF under six years of age.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31980676 PMCID: PMC6981182 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-57964-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(A) Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on samples after removal of lowly expressed miRNAs (Ct >25) and normalisation of Ct values. (B) Correlation plots showing the correlation between sex, genotype (GT), age, BAL Total cell count (BAL), neutrophil elastase levels (NEL), IL-8 concentration (IL-8), Haemophilus spp. (Haem), Escherichia spp. (Esch), Staphyloccus spp. (Staph), antibiotic treatment (Antib), PC1 and PC2. The size of the circles is proportional to the strength of the correlation and the colour represents the direction i.e. a large dark blue circle represents a strong positive correlation and a large dark red circle represents a strong negative correlation.
Figure 2(A,B) Boxplots showing the distribution of normalised Ct for the two miRNAs found significantly differentially expressed between females and males in the TaqMan OpenArray: (A) miR-193a-5p and (B) miR-885-5p. (C) Validation of differential expression of miR-885-5p by qPCR, p < 0.0001. (D,E) Box plots showing the distribution of normalised Ct for the two miRNAs found differentially expressed between p.Phe508del homozygous females and males in the TaqMan OpenArray: (D) miR-17 and (E) miR-199a-3p.
Figure 3(A) Table showing experimentally validated targets of miR-885-5p, as retrieved from miRTarBase. Only targets with evidence from more than one publication are listed. (B) Removal of GO term redundancy and semantic visualisation of the significantly associated GO biological processes (adjusted p value < 0.05) using REVIGO. The scatterplot shows the cluster representatives (after redundancy reduction) in a two-dimensional space derived by applying multidimensional scaling to a matrix of the GO terms’ semantic similarities (the axes have no intrinsic meaning). Bubble colour indicates the log10 (adjusted p value); size indicates the frequency of the GO Biological Process terms in the underlying UniProt database (bubbles of more general terms are larger). (C) Schematic summarising RAC1 related pathways by which miR-885-5p may potentially influence CF pathogenesis (dashed lined indicates ‘possible’).
Patient characteristics of the study cohort.
| Sex | CFTR Genotype | Age (yr) | BAL cell no. (x106/ml) | NE levels | IL-8 (pg/ml) | Antibiotic Treatment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p.Phe508del/ p.Phe508del | 1 | 1.2 | 32.46 | 185.45 | − | − | − | − | − | No |
| F | p.Phe508del/ p.Phe508del | 6 | 74.7 | 0.00 | 192.10 | + | − | − | + | − | No |
| F | G551D/G551D | 3 | 1.1 | 54.52 | 276.27 | − | + | − | − | − | No |
| F | G551D/G551D | 4 | 4.2 | 0.00 | 1673.19 | − | − | − | − | − | No |
| F | p.Phe508del/ p.Phe508del | 1 | 3.1 | 0.00 | 1716.03 | - | − | − | − | − | Yes |
| F | p.Phe508del/ p.Phe508del | 2 | 41 | 0.00 | 1745.38 | − | − | − | − | − | No |
| M | p.Phe508del/ p.Phe508del | 3 | 2.7 | 13454.38 | 336.85 | + | − | − | − | Yes | |
| M | p.Phe508del/ p.Phe508del | 4 | 86 | 0.00 | 841.81 | − | − | − | − | − | No |
| M | p.Phe508del/c.2988+1 G > A | 2 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 841.81 | − | + | + | Yes | ||
| M | C489+2 G > T/c.1558 G > T | 1 | 7.5 | 0.00 | 109.08 | + | − | − | Yes | ||
| M | p.Phe508del/ p.Phe508del | 3 | 15 | 0.00 | 512.74 | + | − | − | − | + | Yes |
| M | p.Phe508del/ p.Phe508del | 3 | 55.1 | 227.71 | 1162.45 | + | − | − | Yes |