Literature DB >> 31976569

1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging generates accurate 3D proximal femoral models: Surgical planning implications for femoroacetabular impingement.

Philip Malloy1,2, Jacob Gasienica1, Robert Dawe1, Alejandro A Espinoza Orías1, Benedict U Nwachukwu1, Nozomu Inoue1, Adam B Yanke1, Shane J Nho1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to validate three-dimensional (3D) proximal femoral surface models generated from a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by comparing these 3D models to those derived from the clinical "gold standard" of computed tomography (CT) scan and to ground-truth surface models obtained by laser scans (LSs) of the excised femurs. Four intact bilateral cadaveric pelvis specimens underwent CT and MRI scans and 3D surface models were generated. Six femurs were extracted from these specimens, and the overlying soft tissues were removed. The extracted femurs were then laser scanned to produce a ground-truth surface model. A 3D-3D registration method was used to compare the signed and absolute surface-to-surface distances between the 3D models. Absolute agreement was evaluated using a 95% confidence interval (CI) derived from the precision of the LS ground-truth. Paired samples t tests and Kolmogrov-Smirnov tests were performed to compare the differences between the signed and absolute surface-to-surface distances between the models. The average signed surface-to-surface distances for the MRI vs LS and MRI vs CT models were 0.07 and 0.16 mm, respectively. These differences fell within the 95% CI of ±0.20 mm indicating absolute agreement between the surface models generated from these modalities. The signed surface-to-surface distance was significantly smaller for MRI vs LS ground truth model as compared with the CT vs LS model. Femoral models derived from a 1.5 T MRI scan demonstrated absolute agreement with the clinical gold standard of CT-derived models and were most like LS ground truth models of the excised femurs.
© 2020 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FAI; clinical; diagnostic imaging; hip

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31976569     DOI: 10.1002/jor.24596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  7 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Quantification of Cam Resection Using MRI Bone Models: A Comparison of 2 Techniques.

Authors:  Thomas D Alter; Derrick M Knapik; Martina Guidetti; Alejandro Espinoza; Jorge Chahla; Shane J Nho; Philip Malloy
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-06

2.  Accuracy of MRI-Based Talar Cartilage Thickness Measurement and Talus Bone and Cartilage Modeling: Comparison with Ground-Truth Laser Scan Measurements.

Authors:  Carly A Lockard; Ingrid K Stake; Alex W Brady; Madeleine G DeClercq; Kira K Tanghe; Brenton W Douglass; Erik Nott; Charles P Ho; Thomas O Clanton
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Three-dimensional curvature mismatch of the acetabular radius to the femoral head radius is increased in borderline dysplastic hips.

Authors:  Tohru Irie; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Tomoyo Y Irie; Shane J Nho; Daisuke Takahashi; Norimasa Iwasaki; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Three-Dimensional Measures of Bony Resection During Femoral Osteochondroplasty Are Related to Alpha Angle Measures: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Thomas D Alter; Philip Malloy; Alex C Newhouse; Sunikom Suppauksorn; Alejandro Espinzoa Orias; Jorge Chahla; Nozomu Inoue; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-09-27

5.  Preoperative Dynamic Hip Examination Under Fluoroscopic Guidance Enhances the Understanding of Femoroacetabular Impingement Pathology and Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Vitali Goriainov; Laura Chapman; Fadi Hindi; Andrew J Langdown
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-09-11

6.  MRI-based synthetic CT shows equivalence to conventional CT for the morphological assessment of the hip joint.

Authors:  Mateusz C Florkow; Koen Willemsen; Frank Zijlstra; Wouter Foppen; Bart C H van der Wal; Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp; Max A Viergever; René M Castelein; Harrie Weinans; Marijn van Stralen; Ralph J B Sakkers; Peter R Seevinck
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.102

Review 7.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Three-Dimensional Bone Imaging of Musculoskeletal Pathologies: A Review.

Authors:  Mateusz C Florkow; Koen Willemsen; Vasco V Mascarenhas; Edwin H G Oei; Marijn van Stralen; Peter R Seevinck
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.119

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.