Literature DB >> 31976558

Risk factors for conversion in laparoscopic and robotic rectal cancer surgery.

J Crippa1, F Grass1, P Achilli1, K L Mathis1, S R Kelley1, A Merchea2, D T Colibaseanu2, D W Larson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to review risk factors for conversion in a cohort of patients with rectal cancer undergoing minimally invasive abdominal surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients operated on from February 2005 to April 2018. Adult patients undergoing low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection for primary rectal adenocarcinoma by a minimally invasive approach were included. Exclusion criteria were lack of research authorization, stage IV or recurrent rectal cancer, and emergency surgery. Risk factors for conversion were investigated using logistic regression. A subgroup analysis of obese patients (BMI 30 kg/m2 or more) was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 600 patients were included in the analysis. The overall conversion rate was 9·2 per cent. Multivariable analysis showed a 72 per cent lower risk of conversion when patients had robotic surgery (odds ratio (OR) 0·28, 95 per cent c.i. 0·15 to 0·52). Obese patients experienced a threefold higher risk of conversion compared with non-obese patients (47 versus 24·4 per cent respectively; P < 0·001). Robotic surgery was associated with a reduced risk of conversion in obese patients (OR 0·22, 0·07 to 0·71).
CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery was associated with a lower risk of conversion in patients undergoing minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery, in both obese and non-obese patients.
© 2020 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31976558     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  11 in total

Review 1.  Robotic surgery for rectal cancer as a platform to build on: review of current evidence.

Authors:  Pietro Achilli; Fabian Grass; David W Larson
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Male urogenital function after robot-assisted and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Bo Tang; Gengmei Gao; Shanping Ye; Dongning Liu; Qunguang Jiang; Junhua Ai; Xiong Lei; Jun Shi; Taiyuan Li
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 2.030

3.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients: ACS-NSQIP analysis.

Authors:  Sinan Albayati; Kerry Hitos; Christophe R Berney; Matthew J Morgan; Nimalan Pathma-Nathan; Toufic El-Khoury; Arthur Richardson; Daniel I Chu; Jamie Cannon; Greg Kennedy; James Wei Tatt Toh
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-10-21

4.  Quantitative Evaluation of Extramural Vascular Invasion of Rectal Cancer by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Zheng Chen; Da Hu; Guannan Ye; Dayong Xu
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.009

5.  Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive nationwide analysis across 20 years.

Authors:  Marcel André Schneider; Daniel Gero; Matteo Müller; Karoline Horisberger; Andreas Rickenbacher; Matthias Turina
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan.

Authors:  T Matsuyama; H Endo; H Yamamoto; I Takemasa; K Uehara; T Hanai; H Miyata; T Kimura; H Hasegawa; Y Kakeji; M Inomata; Y Kitagawa; Y Kinugasa
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-09-06

Review 7.  The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Michele Manigrasso; Pietro Anoldo; Anna D'Amore; Ugo Elmore; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Gianluca Rompianesi; Sara Vertaldi; Roberto Ivan Troisi; Nader K Francis; Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-18

8.  Available prediction scores of conversion for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery seem to be unsuitable for nowadays rectal cancer management.

Authors:  Hamza Sekkat; Amine Souadka; Lise Courtot; Ali Rafik; Laila Amrani; Amine Benkabbou; Pierre Peyrafort; Urs Giger-Pabst; Elias Karam; Raouf Mohsine; Anass M Majbar; Mehdi Ouaissi
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Myrseth; Linn Såve Nymo; Petter Fosse Gjessing; Hartwig Kørner; Jan Terje Kvaløy; Stig Norderval
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  What Is the Current Role and What Are the Prospects of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery?

Authors:  Emre Bozkurt; Jasper P Sijberden; Mohammed Abu Hilal
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.