| Literature DB >> 31976420 |
Sean Laraway1, Susan Snycerski1, Sean Pradhan2, Bradley E Huitema3.
Abstract
For over a decade, the failure to reproduce findings in several disciplines, including the biomedical, behavioral, and social sciences, have led some authors to claim that there is a so-called "replication (or reproducibility) crisis" in those disciplines. The current article examines: (a) various aspects of the reproducibility of scientific studies, including definitions of reproducibility; (b) published concerns about reproducibility in the scientific literature and public press; (c) variables involved in assessing the success of attempts to reproduce a study; (d) suggested factors responsible for reproducibility failures; (e) types of validity of experimental studies and threats to validity as they relate to reproducibility; and (f) evidence for threats to reproducibility in the behavior science/analysis literature. Suggestions for improving the reproducibility of studies in behavior science and analysis are described throughout. © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019.Keywords: Construct validity; Effect size measures; Null hypothesis significance testing; Replication; Reproducibility; Statistical conclusion validity; Statistical power
Year: 2019 PMID: 31976420 PMCID: PMC6701706 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-019-00193-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Perspect Behav Sci ISSN: 2520-8969