| Literature DB >> 26941311 |
Daniel T Gilbert1, Gary King2, Stephen Pettigrew2, Timothy D Wilson3.
Abstract
A paper from the Open Science Collaboration (Research Articles, 28 August 2015, aac4716) attempting to replicate 100 published studies suggests that the reproducibility of psychological science is surprisingly low. We show that this article contains three statistical errors and provides no support for such a conclusion. Indeed, the data are consistent with the opposite conclusion, namely, that the reproducibility of psychological science is quite high.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26941311 DOI: 10.1126/science.aad7243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Science ISSN: 0036-8075 Impact factor: 47.728