Literature DB >> 31974755

Electrophysiological indicators of gesture perception.

Maria E Cabrera1, Keisha Novak2, Dan Foti2, Richard Voyles3, Juan P Wachs4.   

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) activity in the mu frequency band (8-13 Hz) is suppressed during both gesture performance and observation. However, it is not clear if or how particular characteristics within the kinematic execution of gestures map onto dynamic changes in mu activity. Mapping the time course of gesture kinematics onto that of mu activity could help understand which aspects of gestures capture attention and aid in the classification of communicative intent. In this work, we test whether the timing of inflection points within gesture kinematics predicts the occurrence of oscillatory mu activity during passive gesture observation. The timing for salient features of performed gestures in video stimuli was determined by isolating inflection points in the hands' motion trajectories. Participants passively viewed the gesture videos while continuous EEG data was collected. We used wavelet analysis to extract mu oscillations at 11 Hz and at central electrodes and occipital electrodes. We used linear regression to test for associations between the timing of inflection points in motion trajectories and mu oscillations that generalized across gesture stimuli. Separately, we also tested whether inflection point occurrences evoked mu/alpha responses that generalized across participants. Across all gestures and inflection points, and pooled across participants, peaks in 11 Hz EEG waveforms were detected 465 and 535 ms after inflection points at occipital and central electrodes, respectively. A regression model showed that inflection points in the motion trajectories strongly predicted subsequent mu oscillations ([Formula: see text]<0.01); effects were weaker and non-significant for low (17 Hz) and high (21 Hz) beta activity. When segmented by inflection point occurrence rather than stimulus onset and testing participants as a random effect, inflection points evoked mu and beta activity from 308 to 364 ms at central electrodes, and broad activity from 226 to 800 ms at occipital electrodes. The results suggest that inflection points in gesture trajectories elicit coordinated activity in the visual and motor cortices, with prominent activity in the mu/alpha frequency band and extending into the beta frequency band. The time course of activity indicates that visual processing drives subsequent activity in the motor cortex during gesture processing, with a lag of approximately 80 ms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; Gesture processing; Mirror neuron; Mu

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31974755     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05724-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

Review 1.  Language acquisition: do as you hear.

Authors:  Hugo Théoret; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the ventral premotor area F5 of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Vassilis Raos; Maria-Alessandra Umiltá; Akira Murata; Leonardo Fogassi; Vittorio Gallese
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The frequency of human, manual adjustments in balancing an inverted pendulum is constrained by intrinsic physiological factors.

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Peter J Gawthrop; Martin Lakie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity.

Authors:  Arthur M Glenberg; Marc Sato; Luigi Cattaneo; Lucia Riggio; Daniele Palumbo; Giovanni Buccino
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation highlights the sensorimotor side of empathy for pain.

Authors:  Alessio Avenanti; Domenica Bueti; Gaspare Galati; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Human cortical representations for reaching: mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery.

Authors:  Flavia Filimon; Jonathan D Nelson; Donald J Hagler; Martin I Sereno
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Do mirror neuron areas mediate mu rhythm suppression during imitation and action observation?

Authors:  Lieke Braadbaart; Justin H G Williams; Gordon D Waiter
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Social Mimicry Enhances Mu-Suppression During Action Observation.

Authors:  Jeremy Hogeveen; Tanya L Chartrand; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  EEG theta and Mu oscillations during perception of human and robot actions.

Authors:  Burcu A Urgen; Markus Plank; Hiroshi Ishiguro; Howard Poizner; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Mu suppression - A good measure of the human mirror neuron system?

Authors:  Hannah M Hobson; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.