Literature DB >> 24532320

Social Mimicry Enhances Mu-Suppression During Action Observation.

Jeremy Hogeveen1, Tanya L Chartrand2, Sukhvinder S Obhi1.   

Abstract

During social interactions, there is a tendency for people to mimic the gestures and mannerisms of others, which increases liking and rapport. Psychologists have extensively studied the antecedents and consequences of mimicry at the social level, but the neural basis of this behavior remains unclear. Many researchers have speculated that mimicry is related to activity in the human mirror system (HMS), a network of parietofrontal regions that are involved in both action execution and observation. However, activity of the HMS during reciprocal social interactions involving mimicry has not been demonstrated. Here, we took an electroencephalographic (EEG) index of mirror activity-mu-suppression during action observation-in a pretest/post-test design with 1 of 3 intervening treatments: 1) social interaction in which the participant was mimicked, 2) social interaction without mimicry, or 3) an innocuous computer task, not involving another human agent. The change in mu-suppression from pre- to post-test varied as a function of the intervening treatment, with participants who had been mimicked showing an increase in mu-suppression during the post-treatment action observation session. We propose that this specific modulation of HMS activity as a function of mimicry constitutes the first direct evidence for mirror system involvement in real social mimicry.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; human mirror system; social mimicry; social neuroscience

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24532320     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  9 in total

1.  Social perceptions of warmth and competence influence behavioral intentions and neural processing.

Authors:  Jeremy C Simon; Nadya Styczynski; Jennifer N Gutsell
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Electrophysiological indicators of gesture perception.

Authors:  Maria E Cabrera; Keisha Novak; Dan Foti; Richard Voyles; Juan P Wachs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Testing the relationship between mimicry, trust and rapport in virtual reality conversations.

Authors:  Joanna Hale; Antonia F De C Hamilton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Reduced reward-related neural response to mimicry in individuals with autism.

Authors:  Chun-Ting Hsu; Janina Neufeld; Bhismadev Chakrabarti
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  The Transdiagnostic Relevance of Self-Other Distinction to Psychiatry Spans Emotional, Cognitive and Motor Domains.

Authors:  Clare M Eddy
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  The coordination dynamics of social neuromarkers.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Tognoli; J A Scott Kelso
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  When mirroring is both simple and "smart": how mimicry can be embodied, adaptive, and non-representational.

Authors:  Evan W Carr; Piotr Winkielman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Holding Biological Motion in Working Memory: An fMRI Study.

Authors:  Xiqian Lu; Jian Huang; Yuji Yi; Mowei Shen; Xuchu Weng; Zaifeng Gao
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Walk like me, talk like me. The connection between mirror neurons and autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Jillian M Saffin; Hassaan Tohid
Journal:  Neurosciences (Riyadh)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.906

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.