Literature DB >> 31974033

Incidence, Prognosis and Predictors of Major Vascular Complications and Percutaneous Closure Device Failure Following Contemporary Percutaneous Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Wayne Batchelor1, Krishna Patel2, Julian Hurt3, James Totten4, Penny Burroughs4, Ginny Smith5, Mig Cuervo6, Lakerria Davis7, Abdulla A Damluji8, Kelly Epps8, Matthew Sherwood8, Scott Barnett8, Nadim Geloo8, Shahram Yazdani8, Eric Sarin8, Liam Ryan8, Thomas Noel9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence, prognosis, and predictors of major Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) vascular complications (VCs) and percutaneous vascular closure device failure (PCDF) following contemporary percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR).
BACKGROUND: Limited data exists on the incidence and predictors of VCs and PCDFs following percutaneous TF-TAVR using contemporary 14-16 French (F) sheaths.
METHODS: We recorded clinical and procedural characteristics, computer tomography (CT) angiographic data, 30-day VCs, mortality, and length of stay (LOS) in all consecutive percutaneous TF-TAVRs at a single center from June 2016 to October 2018. CT measures included common femoral artery (CFA) and external iliac artery (EIA) diameters, sheath to CFA and EIA ratios (SFAR and SEIAR), depth of CFA, extent and location of CFA calcification and pelvic vessel tortuosity (2 bends ≥90°). Multivariable regression was used to predict major VCs and percutaneous closure device failure (PCDF), respectively.
RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 303 percutaneous TF-TAVRs. Median age was 80 years, 51% were male, 86% Caucasian, 33% had diabetes mellitus (DM) and mean STS score was 5.8 ± 3.8%. Baseline characteristics were similar in patients with vs. without VCs, other than coronary artery disease (CAD) (69% vs. 54%, respectively; p = 0.029) and DM (21% vs. 36%, respectively; p = 0.02). There were 65 (21%) vascular complications: 19 major VCs [6.3%], 29 minor [VCs 9.6%] and 17 PCDFs [5.6%]. Overall, 30-day mortality was low (2.6%). Major VCs were associated with higher mortality (42% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001) while minor VCs (3% vs. 0%, mortality p = 0.99) and PCDFs (3% vs. 0% mortality, p = 0.99) were not. PCDFs were associated with a longer median LOS (4 vs. 3 days, p = 0.02). The independent predictors of major VCs were pelvic vessel tortuosity (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.1-9.2) and presence of CAD (OR 8.2; 95% CI 1.8-37). Female gender showed a strong trend toward increased risk (OR 3.4; CI 0.84-14; p = 0.086). There were no independent predictors of PCDF.
CONCLUSION: Contemporary percutaneous TF-TAVR is associated with a low risk of mortality, major VCs and PCDFs. Major VCs confer increased mortality and PCDFs prolong LOS. Pelvic vessel tortuosity and a history of CAD predict major VCs; there were no predictors of PCDFs. These results provide a contemporary update on the incidence and implications of these important vascular complications in the current era of percutaneous TF-TAVR using 14-16F vascular sheaths.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TAVR; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; Vascular complications

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31974033      PMCID: PMC8140523          DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med        ISSN: 1878-0938


  27 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using valve academic research consortium definitions: a weighted meta-analysis of 3,519 patients from 16 studies.

Authors:  Philippe Généreux; Stuart J Head; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Susheel Kodali; Ajay J Kirtane; Ke Xu; Craig Smith; Patrick W Serruys; A Pieter Kappetein; Martin B Leon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Incidence, predictors, and implications of access site complications with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Didier Tchetche; Alaide Chieffo; Nicolas Dumonteil; David Messika-Zeitoun; Robert M A van der Boon; Olivier Vahdat; Gill L Buchanan; Bertrand Marcheix; Dominique Himbert; Patrick W Serruys; Jean Fajadet; Antonio Colombo; Didier Carrié; Alec Vahanian; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Surgical cutdown versus percutaneous access in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from the Brazilian TAVI registry.

Authors:  Fernando L M Bernardi; Wilton F Gomes; Fabio S de Brito; Jose A Mangione; Rogério Sarmento-Leite; Dimitry Siqueira; Luiz A Carvalho; Rogério Tumelero; Enio E Guerios; Pedro A Lemos
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Puncture Versus Surgical Cutdown Complications of Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation (from the Spanish TAVI Registry).

Authors:  Marco Hernández-Enriquez; Rut Andrea; Salvatore Brugaletta; Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo; José María Hernández-García; Ramiro Trillo; Mariano Larman; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Nicolás Vázquez-González; Andrés Iñiguez; Javier Zueco; Rafael Ruiz-Salmerón; Raquel Del Valle; Eduardo Molina; Bruno García Del Blanco; Alberto Berenguer; Mariano Valdés; Raúl Moreno; Cristóbal Urbano-Carrillo; Rosana Hernández-Antolín; Federico Gimeno; Ángel Cequier; Ignacio Cruz; José Ramón López-Mínguez; José Ignacio Aramendi; Ángel Sánchez; Javier Goicolea; Agustín Albarrán; José Francisco Díaz; Felipe Navarro; José Moreu; Andrés Morist; Eduard Fernández-Nofrerías; Felipe Fernández-Vázquez; Francisco Ten; Vicente Mainar; Belén Mari; Alberto Saenz; Fernando Alfonso; José Antonio Diarte; Manuel Sancho; Román Lezáun; Dabit Arzamendi; Manel Sabaté
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-29       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Beyond the learning curve: transapical versus transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Kevin L Greason; Rakesh M Suri; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Charanjit S Rihal; David R Holmes; Verghese Mathew
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 1.620

6.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in moderate and high-risk patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Manuel Carnero-Alcázar; Luis Carlos Maroto; Javier Cobiella-Carnicer; Isidre Vilacosta; Luis Nombela-Franco; Ali Alswies; Enrique Villagrán-Medinilla; Carlos Macaya
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 7.  Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.

Authors:  A Pieter Kappetein; Stuart J Head; Philippe Généreux; Nicolo Piazza; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Eugene H Blackstone; Thomas G Brott; David J Cohen; Donald E Cutlip; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Rebecca T Hahn; Ajay J Kirtane; Mitchell W Krucoff; Susheel Kodali; Michael J Mack; Roxana Mehran; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Pascal Vranckx; John G Webb; Stephan Windecker; Patrick W Serruys; Martin B Leon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Trends in Complications and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Experience From the PARTNER Continued Access Registry.

Authors:  Nirat Beohar; Ajay J Kirtane; Eugene Blackstone; Ron Waksman; David Holmes; Sa'ar Minha; Oluseun Alli; Rakesh M Suri; Lars G Svensson; Martin Leon; Susheel Kodali
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 9.  Vascular complications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A concise literature review.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali Chaudhry; Muhammad Rizwan Sardar
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-26

Review 10.  Comparison 30-day clinical complications between transfemoral versus transapical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis review.

Authors:  Xuebiao Li; Minjian Kong; Daming Jiang; Aiqiang Dong
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.637

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for Facilitating Totally Percutaneous Transfemoral TAVR Procedures.

Authors:  Amnon Eitan; Hussein Sliman; Avinoam Shiran; Ronen Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Pledget-assisted hemostasis to fix residual access-site bleedings after double pre-closure technique.

Authors:  Francesco Burzotta; Cristina Aurigemma; Mila Kovacevic; Enrico Romagnoli; Stefano Cangemi; Francecso Bianchini; Marialisa Nesta; Piergiorgio Bruno; Carlo Trani
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  A Real World 10-Year Experience With Vascular Closure Devices and Large-Bore Access in Patients Undergoing Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Gregor Heitzinger; Christina Brunner; Sophia Koschatko; Varius Dannenberg; Katharina Mascherbauer; Kseniya Halavina; Carolina Doná; Matthias Koschutnik; Georg Spinka; Christian Nitsche; Markus Mach; Martin Andreas; Florian Wolf; Christian Loewe; Christoph Neumayer; Michael Gschwandtner; Andrea Willfort-Ehringer; Max-Paul Winter; Irene M Lang; Philipp E Bartko; Christian Hengstenberg; Georg Goliasch
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-21

4.  Reply: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation During COVID-19 Pandemic: The Device Also Matters.

Authors:  Jaffar M Khan; Ron Waksman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2020-09-05

5.  Prevalence of Posttranscatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Vascular Complications in Real Life.

Authors:  Anthony Matta; Ronan Canitrot; Vanessa Nader; Frederic Bouisset; Thibault Lhermusier; Francisco Campelo-Parada; Etienne Grunenwald; Bertrand Marcheix; Meyer Elbaz; Didier Carrie; Jerome Roncalli
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.