| Literature DB >> 31973234 |
Ahmed T A Boraei1, Ahmed A M Sarhan2, Sammer Yousuf3, Assem Barakat4,5.
Abstract
A new series of nitrogen and sulfur heterocyclic systems were efficiently synthesized by linking the following four rings: indole; 1,2,4-triazole; pyridazine; and quinoxaline hybrids. The strength of the acid that catalyzes the condensation of 4-amino-5-(1H-indol-2-yl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione 1 with aromatic aldehydes controlled the final product. Reflux in glacial acetic acid yielded Schiff bases 2-6, whereas concentrated HCl in ethanol resulted in a cyclization product at C-3 of the indole ring to create indolo-triazolo-pyridazinethiones 7-16. This fascinating cyclization approach was applicable with a wide range of aromatic aldehydes to create the target cyclized compounds in excellent yield. Additionally, the coupling of the new indolo-triazolo-pyridazinethiones 7-13 with 2,3-bis(bromomethyl)quinoxaline, as a linker in acetone and K2CO3, yielded 2,3-bis((5,6-dihydro-14H-indolo[2,3-d]-6-aryl-[1,2,4-triazolo][4,3-b]pyridazin-3 ylsulfanyl)methyl)quinoxalines 19-25 in a high yield. The formation of this new class of heterocyclic compounds in high yields warrants their use for further research. The new compounds were characterized using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectral analysis. Compound 6 was further confirmed by the single crystal X-ray diffraction technique.Entities:
Keywords: 1,2,4-Triazolel; annulated heterocycles; indole; linker; pyridazine; quinoxalines
Year: 2020 PMID: 31973234 PMCID: PMC7037119 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25030450
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Selected 1,2,4-triazole- indole scaffolds.
Scheme 1Synthesis of Schiff bases 2–6 and cyclized indolo-triazolo-pyridazinethiones 7–16.
Scheme 2Coupling of indolo-triazolo-pyridazinethiones 7–13 with 2,3-bis(bromomethyl)quinoxaline.
Figure 2(A) 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) of 2, (B) 13C-NMR of 2, (C) 1H-NMR of 7, and (D) 13C-NMR of 7.
Figure 3Structure and atom numbering of 6.
Crystal data for 6.
| Chemical formula | C38H26N10O4S2 |
| Formula weight | 726.79 g/mol |
| Temperature | 104(2) K |
| Wavelength | 1.54178 Å |
| Crystal size | 0.030 × 0.070 × 0.130 mm |
| Crystal habit | Yellow plate |
| Crystal system | Triclinic |
| Space group | P -1 |
| Unit cell dimensions | a = 10.1105(6) Å |
| b = 13.1764(6) Å | |
| c = 14.2858(6) Å | |
| Volume | 1705.44(15) Å3 |
| Z | 2 |
| Density (calculated) | 1.415 g/cm3 |
| Absorption coefficient | 1.893 mm−1 |
| F(000) | 752 |
Data collection and structure refinement for 6. (RMS, root mean square)
| Theta range for data collection | 3.38 to 68.23° |
| Index ranges | −12 ≤ h ≤ 12, −15 ≤ k ≤ 15, −17 ≤ l ≤ 17 |
| Reflections collected | 54525 |
| Independent reflections | 6232 [R(int) = 0.1173] |
| Coverage of independent reflections | 99.9% |
| Absorption correction | Multi-scan |
| Max. and min. transmission | 0.9470 and 0.7960 |
| Structure solution technique | direct methods |
| Structure solution program | SHELXT 2014/5 (Sheldrick, 2014) |
| Refinement method | Full-matrix least-squares on F2 |
| Refinement program | SHELXL-2017/1 (Sheldrick, 2017) |
| Function minimized | Σ w(Fo2 − Fc2)2 |
| Data/restraints/parameters | 6232/0/471 |
| Goodness-of-fit on F2 | 1.085 |
| Final R indices | 4104 data; |
| all data | |
| Weighting scheme | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1000P)2] |
| Largest diff. peak and hole | 1.57 and −0.52 eÅ−3 |
| RMS deviation from mean | 0.110 eÅ−3 |
Figure 4The molecular packing of the synthesized compound 6. Intra and intermolecular hydrogen bonds are indicated as dashed lines.
Hydrogen bond parameters for 6.
| D-H…A | D-H | H…A | D…A | D-H…A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| O1-H1…N1 | 0.84 | 1.94 | 2.659(6) | 143 |
| O3-H3A…N6 | 0.84 | 1.95 | 2.664(6) | 143 |
| C11-H11…S2 | 0.95 | 2.51 | 3.391(5) | 154 |