PURPOSE: This study aims to characterize quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) features of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and to validate them for computer-aided NPDR staging. METHODS: One hundred and twenty OCTA images from 60 NPDR (mild, moderate, and severe stages) patients and 40 images from 20 control subjects were used for this study conducted in a tertiary, subspecialty, academic practice. Both eyes were photographed and all the OCTAs were 6 mm × 6 mm macular scans. Six quantitative features, that is, blood vessel tortuosity, blood vascular caliber, vessel perimeter index, blood vessel density, foveal avascular zone area, and foveal avascular zone contour irregularity (FAZ-CI) were derived from each OCTA image. A support vector machine classification model was trained and tested for computer-aided classification of NPDR stages. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were used as performance metrics of computer-aided classification, and receiver operation characteristics curve was plotted to measure the sensitivity-specificity tradeoff of the classification algorithm. RESULTS: Among 6 individual OCTA features, blood vessel density shows the best classification accuracies, 93.89% and 90.89% for control versus disease and control versus mild NPDR, respectively. Combined feature classification achieved improved accuracies, 94.41% and 92.96%, respectively. Moreover, the temporal-perifoveal region was the most sensitive region for early detection of DR. For multiclass classification, support vector machine algorithm achieved 84% accuracy. CONCLUSION: Blood vessel density was observed as the most sensitive feature, and temporal-perifoveal region was the most sensitive region for early detection of DR. Quantitative OCTA analysis enabled computer-aided identification and staging of NPDR.
PURPOSE: This study aims to characterize quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) features of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and to validate them for computer-aided NPDR staging. METHODS: One hundred and twenty OCTA images from 60 NPDR (mild, moderate, and severe stages) patients and 40 images from 20 control subjects were used for this study conducted in a tertiary, subspecialty, academic practice. Both eyes were photographed and all the OCTAs were 6 mm × 6 mm macular scans. Six quantitative features, that is, blood vessel tortuosity, blood vascular caliber, vessel perimeter index, blood vessel density, foveal avascular zone area, and foveal avascular zone contour irregularity (FAZ-CI) were derived from each OCTA image. A support vector machine classification model was trained and tested for computer-aided classification of NPDR stages. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were used as performance metrics of computer-aided classification, and receiver operation characteristics curve was plotted to measure the sensitivity-specificity tradeoff of the classification algorithm. RESULTS: Among 6 individual OCTA features, blood vessel density shows the best classification accuracies, 93.89% and 90.89% for control versus disease and control versus mild NPDR, respectively. Combined feature classification achieved improved accuracies, 94.41% and 92.96%, respectively. Moreover, the temporal-perifoveal region was the most sensitive region for early detection of DR. For multiclass classification, support vector machine algorithm achieved 84% accuracy. CONCLUSION: Blood vessel density was observed as the most sensitive feature, and temporal-perifoveal region was the most sensitive region for early detection of DR. Quantitative OCTA analysis enabled computer-aided identification and staging of NPDR.
Authors: G K Asdourian; K C Nagpal; B Busse; M Goldbaum; D Patriankos; M F Rabb; M F Goldberg Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 1976-06 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: C P Wilkinson; Frederick L Ferris; Ronald E Klein; Paul P Lee; Carl David Agardh; Matthew Davis; Diana Dills; Anselm Kampik; R Pararajasegaram; Juan T Verdaguer Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Alice Y Kim; Zhongdi Chu; Anoush Shahidzadeh; Ruikang K Wang; Carmen A Puliafito; Amir H Kashani Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Mona Sharifi Sarabi; Maziyar M Khansari; Jiong Zhang; Sam Kushner-Lenhoff; Jin Kyu Gahm; Yuchuan Qiao; Amir H Kashani; Yonggang Shi Journal: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform Date: 2020-12-04 Impact factor: 5.772
Authors: Yi-Ting Hsieh; Minhaj Nur Alam; David Le; Chia-Chieh Hsiao; Chang-Hao Yang; Daniel L Chao; Xincheng Yao Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2019-05-07
Authors: Tristan T Hormel; Thomas S Hwang; Steven T Bailey; David J Wilson; David Huang; Yali Jia Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 21.198