Literature DB >> 31972791

RIDGE-SHAPED MACULA IN YOUNG MYOPIC PATIENTS AND ITS DIFFERENTIATION FROM TYPICAL DOME-SHAPED MACULA IN ELDERLY MYOPIC PATIENTS.

Xian Xu1,2, Yuxin Fang1, Jost B Jonas3, Ran Du1, Kosei Shinohara1, Noriko Tanaka1, Tae Yokoi1, Yuka Onishi1, Kengo Uramoto1, Koju Kamoi1, Takeshi Yoshida1, Kyoko Ohno-Matsui1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess and compare clinical features of a ridge-shaped macula (defined as macular elevation only in one meridian across the fovea) in individuals younger than 20 years with those of a dome-shaped macula (DSM) in patients aged 20+ years.
METHODS: The retrospective observational case series study included 185 highly myopic eyes of 100 consecutive patients younger than 20 years, who were compared with highly myopic patients with DSMs, aged 20+ years and examined in previous studies.
RESULTS: Seventeen (9.2%) eyes of the highly myopic young patients showed macular elevations all of which ran only in the horizontal direction across the vertical optical coherence tomographic section fulfilled the definition of a ridge and did not show any staphylomas or any macular Bruch membrane defects. By contrast, in the older patients with DSMs, the DSMs were significantly higher and had a narrower base than the ridges in the young patients, and showed macular Bruch membrane defects in their vicinity, with the axial length being significantly longer, the myopic maculopathy more severe, and the subfoveal choroid thinner.
CONCLUSION: Macular elevations detected in children and adolescents are usually ridge-shaped maculas and do not have the characteristics of DSMs. In comparison with DSMs, ridge-shaped maculas do not show a spatial association with macular Bruch membrane defects or posterior staphylomas and have a wider basis and smoother elevation slope. As a hypothesis, ridge-shaped maculas may be due to a folding of Bruch membrane at the posterior pole, potentially caused by an asymmetrical enlargement of Bruch membrane in the equatorial region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31972791     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Epidemiology and anatomy of myopia].

Authors:  Jost B Jonas; Songhomitra Panda-Jonas
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Dome-shaped maculopathy: a review.

Authors:  Mukesh Jain; Lingam Gopal; Tapas Ranjan Padhi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 4.456

3.  Dome-shaped macula in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Eunhae Shin; Kyung-Ah Park; Sei Yeul Oh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Histology of neovascular myopic macular degeneration.

Authors:  Shefali B Jonas; Songhomitra Panda-Jonas; Jost B Jonas; Rahul A Jonas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Dome-shaped macula in premature infants visualized by handheld spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Alex T Legocki; Yasman Moshiri; Emily M Zepeda; Thomas B Gillette; Ayesha Shariff; Laura E Grant; Leona Ding; Aaron Y Lee; Cecilia S Lee; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch; Michelle T Cabrera
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 1.325

6.  Subfoveal retinal detachment associated with dome-shaped macula in a 6 year-old child: Comparison with other case reports and systematic review of the literature regarding dome-shaped macula in children.

Authors:  M Pilar Martin-Gutierrez; Michalis Georgiou; Michel Michaelides
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-08

7.  Macular irregularities of optical coherence tomographic vertical cross sectional images in school age children.

Authors:  Takehiro Yamashita; Hiroto Terasaki; Ryo Asaoka; Naoya Yoshihara; Naoko Kakiuchi; Taiji Sakamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.