Literature DB >> 31971796

Native vs Denatured: An in Depth Investigation of Charge State and Isotope Distributions.

Jared O Kafader1, Rafael D Melani1, Luis F Schachner1, Ashley N Ives1, Steven M Patrie1, Neil L Kelleher1, Philip D Compton1.   

Abstract

New tools and techniques have dramatically accelerated the field of structural biology over the past several decades. One potent and relatively new technique that is now being utilized by an increasing number of laboratories is the combination of so-called "native" electrospray ionization (ESI) with mass spectrometry (MS) for the characterization of proteins and their noncovalent complexes. However, native ESI-MS produces species at increasingly higher m/z with increasing molecular weight, leading to substantial differences when compared to traditional mass spectrometric approaches using denaturing ESI solutions. Herein, these differences are explored both theoretically and experimentally to understand the role that charge state and isotopic distributions have on signal-to-noise (S/N) as a function of complex molecular weight and how the reduced collisional cross sections of proteins electrosprayed under native solution conditions can lead to improved data quality in image current mass analyzers, such as Orbitrap and FT-ICR. Quantifying ion signal differences under native and denatured conditions revealed enhanced S/N and a more gradual decay in S/N with increasing mass under native conditions. Charge state and isotopic S/N models, supported by experimental results, indicate that analysis of proteins under native conditions at 100 kDa will be 17 times more sensitive than analysis under denatured conditions at the same mass. Higher masses produce even larger sensitivity gains. Furthermore, reduced cross sections under native conditions lead to lower levels of ion decay within an Orbitrap scan event over long transient acquisition times, enabling isotopic resolution of species with molecular weights well in excess of those typically resolved under denatured conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31971796      PMCID: PMC7539638          DOI: 10.1021/jasms.9b00040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  46 in total

1.  A tandem mass spectrometer for improved transmission and analysis of large macromolecular assemblies.

Authors:  Frank Sobott; Helena Hernández; Margaret G McCammon; Mark A Tito; Carol V Robinson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Investigation of intact protein complexes by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Albert J R Heck; Robert H H Van Den Heuvel
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 10.946

3.  Analyzing enzymatic pH activity profiles and protein titration curves using structure-based pKa calculations and titration curve fitting.

Authors:  Jens Erik Nielsen
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 4.  Mass spectrometry for structural characterization of therapeutic antibodies.

Authors:  Zhongqi Zhang; Hai Pan; Xiaoyu Chen
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 10.946

5.  High-fidelity mass analysis unveils heterogeneity in intact ribosomal particles.

Authors:  Michiel van de Waterbeemd; Kyle L Fort; Dmitriy Boll; Maria Reinhardt-Szyba; Andrew Routh; Alexander Makarov; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 6.  Native ion mobility-mass spectrometry and related methods in structural biology.

Authors:  A Konijnenberg; A Butterer; F Sobott
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-12-14

7.  On the scalability and requirements of whole protein mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Philip D Compton; Leonid Zamdborg; Paul M Thomas; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Defining Gas-Phase Fragmentation Propensities of Intact Proteins During Native Top-Down Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Nicole A Haverland; Owen S Skinner; Ryan T Fellers; Areeba A Tariq; Bryan P Early; Richard D LeDuc; Luca Fornelli; Philip D Compton; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Mass spectrometric determination of disulfide linkages in recombinant therapeutic proteins using online LC-MS with electron-transfer dissociation.

Authors:  Shiaw-Lin Wu; Haitao Jiang; Qiaozhen Lu; Shujia Dai; William S Hancock; Barry L Karger
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Evaluating the utility of ion mobility separation in combination with high-pressure liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry to facilitate detection of trace impurities in formulated drug products.

Authors:  Christine Eckers; Alice M-F Laures; Kevin Giles; Hilary Major; Steve Pringle
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.419

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  High-Resolution Native Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Sem Tamara; Maurits A den Boer; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 72.087

2.  Reassembling protein complexes after controlled disassembly by top-down mass spectrometry in native mode.

Authors:  Luis F Schachner; Denise P Tran; Alexander Lee; John P McGee; Kevin Jooss; Kenneth Durbin; Henrique Dos Santos Seckler; Lauren Adams; Erika Cline; Rafael Melani; Ashley N Ives; Benjamin Des Soye; Neil L Kelleher; Steven M Patrie
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 1.934

Review 3.  Characterizing Endogenous Protein Complexes with Biological Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Rivkah Rogawski; Michal Sharon
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 72.087

4.  Top-down proteomics: challenges, innovations, and applications in basic and clinical research.

Authors:  Kyle A Brown; Jake A Melby; David S Roberts; Ying Ge
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.940

5.  Separation and Characterization of Endogenous Nucleosomes by Native Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Top-Down Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Kevin Jooß; Luis F Schachner; Rachel Watson; Zachary B Gillespie; Sarah A Howard; Marcus A Cheek; Matthew J Meiners; Amin Sobh; Jonathan D Licht; Michael-Christopher Keogh; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Isotopic Resolution of Protein Complexes up to 466 kDa Using Individual Ion Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  John P McGee; Rafael D Melani; Ping F Yip; Michael W Senko; Philip D Compton; Jared O Kafader; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Metal-responsive regulation of enzyme catalysis using genetically encoded chemical switches.

Authors:  Yasmine S Zubi; Kosuke Seki; Ying Li; Andrew C Hunt; Bingqing Liu; Benoît Roux; Michael C Jewett; Jared C Lewis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Thermodynamic coupling between neighboring binding sites in homo-oligomeric ligand sensing proteins from mass resolved ligand-dependent population distributions.

Authors:  Weicheng Li; Andrew S Norris; Katie Lichtenthal; Skyler Kelly; Elihu C Ihms; Paul Gollnick; Vicki H Wysocki; Mark P Foster
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  Native mass spectrometry of human carbonic anhydrase I and its inhibitor complexes.

Authors:  Carlotta Zoppi; Alessio Nocentini; Claudiu T Supuran; Alessandro Pratesi; Luigi Messori
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.358

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.