OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis and treatment of childhood cancer can impact the mental health of the family. Early psychosocial risk screening may help guide interventions. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate if an intervention (providing psychosocial risk information to the patient's treating team) would result in decreased depression symptoms in caregivers, in general, and relative to initial psychosocial risk. A secondary aim was to examine intervention effects in a small sample of patient and sibling self-reported outcomes. METHODS: We randomly allocated families to the intervention group (IG, treating team received PAT summary) or control group (CG, no summary). One hundred and twenty-two caregivers of children newly diagnosed with cancer completed measures of depression and anxiety and psychosocial risk 2-4 weeks from diagnosis (T1) and 6 months later (T2). Patients and siblings completed self-report measures of depression and anxiety. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in caregiver depression symptoms between the IG and CG at T2. However, in the context of psychosocial risk, caregivers in the IG showed improvement in depression scores compared to CG when risk was high near diagnosis (Ms = 6.68 vs. 9.76, respectively, d = .60). Similar results were found in anxiety scores. Intervention effects with patients and siblings were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Sharing psychosocial risk information with the treating team had measurable impact on mental health outcomes only if caregivers had initial high psychosocial risk. This study contributes to our understanding of mapping psychosocial screening and resources to improve outcomes in families managing childhood cancer. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis and treatment of childhood cancer can impact the mental health of the family. Early psychosocial risk screening may help guide interventions. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate if an intervention (providing psychosocial risk information to the patient's treating team) would result in decreased depression symptoms in caregivers, in general, and relative to initial psychosocial risk. A secondary aim was to examine intervention effects in a small sample of patient and sibling self-reported outcomes. METHODS: We randomly allocated families to the intervention group (IG, treating team received PAT summary) or control group (CG, no summary). One hundred and twenty-two caregivers of children newly diagnosed with cancer completed measures of depression and anxiety and psychosocial risk 2-4 weeks from diagnosis (T1) and 6 months later (T2). Patients and siblings completed self-report measures of depression and anxiety. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in caregiver depression symptoms between the IG and CG at T2. However, in the context of psychosocial risk, caregivers in the IG showed improvement in depression scores compared to CG when risk was high near diagnosis (Ms = 6.68 vs. 9.76, respectively, d = .60). Similar results were found in anxiety scores. Intervention effects with patients and siblings were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Sharing psychosocial risk information with the treating team had measurable impact on mental health outcomes only if caregivers had initial high psychosocial risk. This study contributes to our understanding of mapping psychosocial screening and resources to improve outcomes in families managing childhood cancer. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Jordan Gilleland Marchak; Sean N Halpin; Cam Escoffery; Shadé Owolabi; Ann C Mertens; Karen Wasilewski-Masker Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Anne E Kazak; Janet A Deatrick; Michele A Scialla; Eric Sandler; Rebecca E Madden; Lamia P Barakat Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Janet A Deatrick; Anne E Kazak; Rebecca E Madden; Glynnis A McDonnell; Katherine Okonak; Michele A Scialla; Lamia P Barakat Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2021-06-05