| Literature DB >> 31969531 |
Khoa Lai1,2, Ngoc Thai Nguyen3, Hiroki Miwa3, Michiko Yasuda3, Hiep Huu Nguyen4, Shin Okazaki1,3.
Abstract
The Vietnamese Mekong delta is one of the largest rice-producing areas globally. Methylobacterium spp. are persistent colonizers of the rice plant and exert beneficial effects on plant growth and health. Sixty-one Methylobacterium strains belonging to seven species were predominantly isolated from the phyllosphere of rice cultivated in six Mekong delta provinces. Inoculation tests revealed that some strains exhibited plant growth-promoting activity. Moreover, three strains possessed the novel characteristics of inducing leaf bleaching and killing rice seedlings. These results revealed the complex diversity of Methylobacterium in Mekong delta rice and that healthy and productive rice cultivation requires a proper balance of Methylobacterium.Entities:
Keywords: Mekong delta; Methylobacterium; disease; plant growth promotion; rice
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31969531 PMCID: PMC7104282 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME19111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Fig. 1.Sampling sites of rice samples. Rice samples were collected from six sites indicated by different colors.
Fig. 2.Distribution of Methylobacterium spp. according to plant locations and isolation sites. (A) The percentages of each species isolated from the phyllosphere and rhizosphere are as follows: M. radiotolerans (90%, 10%), M. salsuginis (65%, 35%), M. komagatae (75%, 25%), M. rhodium (83%, 17%), and M. indicum/oryzae/aquaticum (80%, 20%). (B) The percentages of each species isolated from the Northern region (Dong Nai, Ho Chi Minh, and Khanh Hoa) and Southern region (Tien Giang, Vinh Long, and Can Tho) of the Mekong delta are as follows: M. radiotolerans (68%, 32%), M. salsuginis (29%, 71%), M. komagatae (50%, 50%), M. rhodium (66%, 33%), and M. indicum/oryzae/aquaticum (60%, 40%).
Effects of selected Methylobacterium isolates on rice and lettuce growth.
| Plant parameters | Treatments (isolates) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Un-inoculated | HP18.2 | HP19.2 | DR25.3 | DP26.3 | CP40.1 | VR43.1 | |
| Length of rice roots (cm) | 10.4±1.2c | 10.9±1.3bc | 11.5±1.3ab | 11.4±1.2ab | 10.4±1.4c | 11.2±1.2abc | 11.9±1.4a |
| Length of rice leaves (cm) | 23.0±1.9b | 23.9±2.4ab | 23.6±2.2ab | 23.5±2.5ab | 23.3±2.2ab | 24.6±1.1a | 23.0±2.5b |
| Weight of rice leaves (g) | 0.124±0.008c | 0.136±0.022a | 0.134±0.007ab | 0.124±0.016bc | 0.126±0.010bc | 0.130±0.015abc | 0.126±0.018bc |
| Length of lettuce leaves (cm) | 5.6±0.2b | 6.1±0.3a | 5.9±0.3a | 5.9±0.2a | 6.0±0.3a | 5.8±0.3ab | 5.8±0.4ab |
| Weight of lettuce leaves (g) | 0.115±0.011b | 0.125±0.011a | 0.127±0.008a | 0.121±0.010ab | 0.123±0.011ab | 0.117±0.005ab | 0.117±0.005ab |
Data represent means±SD (n=36 for rice and n=15 for lettuce).
Means followed by different letters are significantly different at the 5% level (ANOVA with Tukey’s test).
Fig. 3.Bleaching symptom of rice seedlings. This image was acquired following a 5-day inoculation with VP43.2, DP28.3, and DP28.4 isolates. Un-inoculated seedlings were used as the control and seedlings inoculated with HP19.2 did not exhibit any bleaching symptom. Scale bar=2 cm.