Literature DB >> 31969178

Biomarkers to delineate bacteremia from candidemia remain a challenging issue.

Patrick M Honore1, Christina David2, Rachid Attou2, Sebastien Redant2, Andrea Gallerani2, David De Bels2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31969178      PMCID: PMC6977257          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2720-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
In their recent systematic review, Cortegiani et al. found that serum procalcitonin (PCT) concentrations were higher in patients with bacteremia as compared to candidemia [1]. Quality of data was poor and did not allow to use PCT alone to differentiate bacteremia from candidemia [1]. While we agree with their findings regarding patients with positive hemocultures in the ward, we would like to address the results of the patients with positive hemocultures in the intensive care unit (ICU) [1]. In a randomized controlled study (RCT) comparing the clinical manifestations of septic shock caused by bacteria or Candida spp., the rate of acute kidney injury (AKI) defined by a creatinine above 3.5 mg/dl or the need of any form of renal replacement therapy (RRT) was around 20% in the bacteria group versus above 40% in the candida group, while having similar Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores [2]. Accordingly, the rate of RRT in the candidemia group will be twice as high as compared to the bacteremia group [2]. It is plausible that there are similar trends in the Cortegiani study [2]. PCT has an approximate molecular weight of 14.5 kDa [3]. The contemporary continuous RRT (CRRT) membranes are able to remove molecules as large as 35 kDa [3]. Hence, most of the PCT mass will be eliminated by convective flow [3], but adsorption also contributes to elimination if using new highly adsorptive membranes (HAM) [4]. Accordingly, imbalance between the use of CRRT in the two cohorts (bacteremia versus candidemia) will have an important impact upon the values of PCT in each cohort. PCT levels may therefore be affected not only by the type of pathogen but also by the incidence of RRT. A future study with a focus on the performance of the currently known sepsis biomarkers among those who receive CRRT is urgently needed [4]. As alluded too by Cortegiani et al., beta-d-glucan (BDG) could be a very good candidate associated to PCT. Indeed, BDG could be even a better candidate as its molecular weight ranges from several hundred thousand to 10 million daltons and does not pass through any membrane [4, 5]. Finally, we would like to add that BDG can be also be falsely elevated in case of gastrointestinal colonization of Candida albicans that increases serum BDG without candidemia [5].

Authors’ response: Procalcitonin, candidemia, and CRRT: more research is needed but do not forget pathophysiology

Andrea Cortegiani, Mariachiara Ippolito and Antonino Giarratano We would like to thank Dr. Honore et al. for discussing the potential role of acute kidney injury (AKI) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) as potential confounders on the different values of procalcitonin (PCT) in patients with bacteremia versus candidemia in the intensive care unit (ICU) in our systematic review [1]. We evaluated the included studies conducted in ICU setting, and we can confirm that no study specifically reported the rate of CRRT in both bacteremia and candidemia cohorts [1]. One study generally reported the proportion of patients receiving “hemodialysis” at the moment of infection, without significant difference (10% candidemia group vs 14% bacteremia group) [6]. Indeed, PCT values in patients with bloodstream infection from bacteria and Candida spp. receiving CRRT and blood purification techniques should be addressed in future studies. Another interesting aspect would be the impact of CRRT in the trend of PCT values in these patients, since almost all the included studies reported the values at the beginning of the diagnostic process [1]. However, the pathophysiology of the immune response and inflammatory response seems to be different in patients with candidemia, with signs of immune cell exhaustion, suppressive immunophenotype of T cells, and concomitant downregulation of positive co-stimulatory molecules [7-9]. These findings may be considered the main potential mechanisms for the different PCT level at the moment of the diagnostic process even in the ICU patients.
  9 in total

1.  Dying with or Because of Invasive Fungal Infection? The Role of Immunity Exhaustion on Patient Outcome.

Authors:  Andrea Cortegiani; Vincenzo Russotto; Santi Maurizio Raineri; Cesare Gregoretti; Antonino Giarratano
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  Gastrointestinal Colonization of Candida Albicans Increases Serum (1→3)-β-D-Glucan, without Candidemia, and Worsens Cecal Ligation and Puncture Sepsis in Murine Model.

Authors:  Wimonrat Panpetch; Naraporn Somboonna; Dewi Embong Bulan; Jiraphorn Issara-Amphorn; Navaporn Worasilchai; Malcolm Finkelman; Ariya Chindamporn; Tanapat Palaga; Somying Tumwasorn; Asada Leelahavanichkul
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Candidemia as a cause of septic shock and multiple organ failure in nonimmunocompromised patients.

Authors:  Susan Hadley; Winnie W Lee; Robin Ruthazer; Stanley A Nasraway
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  An update on membranes and cartridges for extracorporeal blood purification in sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Patrick M Honoré; David De Bels; Herbert D Spapen
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.687

5.  T cells from patients with Candida sepsis display a suppressive immunophenotype.

Authors:  Andrej Spec; Yuichiro Shindo; Carey-Ann D Burnham; Strother Wilson; Enyo A Ablordeppey; Evan R Beiter; Katherine Chang; Anne M Drewry; Richard S Hotchkiss
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  From bedside to bench: the missing brick for patients with fungal sepsis.

Authors:  Vincenzo Russotto; Andrea Cortegiani; Santi Maurizio Raineri; Antonino Giarratano
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Combined use of serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan and procalcitonin for the early differential diagnosis between candidaemia and bacteraemia in intensive care units.

Authors:  Daniele Roberto Giacobbe; Malgorzata Mikulska; Mario Tumbarello; Elisa Furfaro; Marzia Spadaro; Angela Raffaella Losito; Alessio Mesini; Gennaro De Pascale; Anna Marchese; Marco Bruzzone; Paolo Pelosi; Michele Mussap; Alexandre Molin; Massimo Antonelli; Brunella Posteraro; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Claudio Viscoli; Valerio Del Bono
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Procalcitonin levels in candidemia versus bacteremia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea Cortegiani; Giovanni Misseri; Mariachiara Ippolito; Matteo Bassetti; Antonino Giarratano; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Sharon Einav
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Mass transfer, clearance and plasma concentration of procalcitonin during continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with septic shock and acute oliguric renal failure.

Authors:  Claude Level; Philippe Chauveau; Olivier Guisset; Marie Cécile Cazin; Catherine Lasseur; Claude Gabinsky; Stéphane Winnock; Danièle Montaudon; Régis Bedry; Caroline Nouts; Odile Pillet; Georges Gbikpi Benissan; Jean Claude Favarel-Guarrigues; Yves Castaing
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Machine-learning based prediction and analysis of prognostic risk factors in patients with candidemia and bacteraemia: a 5-year analysis.

Authors:  Yali Gao; Mingsui Tang; Yaling Li; Xueli Niu; Jingyi Li; Chang Fu; Zihan Wang; Jiayi Liu; Bing Song; Hongduo Chen; Xinghua Gao; Xiuhao Guan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.061

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.